scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

American Cancer Society

NonprofitAtlanta, Georgia, United States
About: American Cancer Society is a nonprofit organization based out in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Population. The organization has 1339 authors who have published 3700 publications receiving 688166 citations. The organization is also known as: American Cancer Society, ACS & American Society for the Control of Cancer.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is a modest association between type 2 DM and CRC among men, but not women, and insulin use is not associated with a substantially increased risk of CRC.

129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Evidence is provided that the average mortality reduction in all the trials underestimates the true mortality reduction, and that substantially greater breast cancer mortality reductions can be expected in screening programs that are effective in reducing advanced stage breast cancer.
Abstract: It is desirable to have a strategy for evaluation of breast cancer service screening programs years before the long-term breast cancer mortality data are available. Since successful mammography screening has a significant impact on two components of the TNM (tumor size, node status, presence or absence of distant metastases) classification system, tumor size and node status, we investigated the effect of the randomized breast screening trials on incidence of advanced stage disease and on the subsequent breast cancer death rate. In the trials that achieved a 20% or greater reduction in advanced stage disease, there was an average breast cancer mortality reduction of 28% among women invited to screening (attenders and nonattenders combined). In the trials that achieved a reduction in advanced stage disease of less than 10%, there was no reduction in breast cancer mortality among women invited to screening. This study provides evidence that the average mortality reduction in all the trials underestimates the true mortality reduction, and that substantially greater breast cancer mortality reductions can be expected in screening programs that are effective in reducing advanced stage breast cancer. In addition, monitoring the incidence of advanced stage breast cancer in an ongoing screening program can provide a sensitive and early indicator of the subsequent mortality from the disease.

129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In the United States, whites and blacks experienced opposite trends in pancreatic cancer death rates between 1970 and 2009 that are largely unexplainable by known risk factors.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Few studies have examined trends in pancreatic cancer death rates in the United States, and there have been no studies examining recent trends using age-period-cohort analysis. METHODS Annual percentage change in pancreatic cancer death rates was calculated for 1970 to 2009 by sex and race among adults aged 35 to 84 years using US mortality data provided by the National Center for Health Statistics and Joinpoint Regression. Age-period-cohort modeling was performed to evaluate the changes in cohort and period effects. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS In white men, pancreatic cancer death rates decreased by 0.7% per year from 1970 to 1995 and then increased by 0.4% per year through 2009. Among white women, rates increased slightly from 1970 to 1984, stabilized until the late 1990s, then increased by 0.5% per year through 2009. In contrast, the rates among blacks increased between 1970 and the late 1980s (women) or early 1990s (men) and then decreased thereafter. Age-period-cohort analysis showed that pancreatic cancer death risk was highest for the 1900 to 1910 birth cohort in men and the 1920 to 1930 birth cohort in women and there was a statistically significant increase in period effects since the late 1990s in both white men and white women (two-sided Wald test, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS In the United States, whites and blacks experienced opposite trends in pancreatic cancer death rates between 1970 and 2009 that are largely unexplainable by known risk factors. This study underscores the needs for urgent action to curb the increasing trends of pancreatic cancer in whites and for better understanding of the etiology of this disease.

129 citations

James R. Cerhan1, Sonja I. Berndt2, Joseph Vijai3, Hervé Ghesquières4, James D. McKay5, Sophia S. Wang6, Zhaoming Wang2, Meredith Yeager2, Lucia Conde7, Paul I.W. de Bakker8, Alexandra Nieters9, David G. Cox, Laurie Burdett2, Alain Monnereau, Christopher R. Flowers10, Anneclaire J. De Roos11, Anneclaire J. De Roos12, Angela Brooks-Wilson13, Angela Brooks-Wilson14, Qing Lan2, Gianluca Severi15, Gianluca Severi16, Mads Melbye17, Mads Melbye18, Jian Gu19, Rebecca D. Jackson20, Eleanor Kane21, Lauren R. Teras22, Mark P. Purdue2, Claire M. Vajdic23, John J. Spinelli13, Graham G. Giles15, Graham G. Giles16, Demetrius Albanes2, Rachel S. Kelly24, Rachel S. Kelly25, Mariagrazia Zucca26, Kimberly A. Bertrand24, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte27, Charles Lawrence28, Amy K. Hutchinson2, Degui Zhi29, Thomas M. Habermann1, Brian K. Link30, Anne J. Novak1, Ahmet Dogan3, Yan W. Asmann1, Mark Liebow1, Carrie A. Thompson1, Stephen M. Ansell1, Thomas E. Witzig1, George J. Weiner30, Amelie S. Veron, Diana Zelenika, Hervé Tilly, Corinne Haioun, Thierry Jo Molina31, Henrik Hjalgrim17, Bengt Glimelius32, Bengt Glimelius33, Hans-Olov Adami24, Hans-Olov Adami33, Paige M. Bracci34, Jacques Riby7, Martyn T. Smith7, Elizabeth A. Holly34, Wendy Cozen35, Patricia Hartge2, Lindsay M. Morton2, Richard K. Severson36, Lesley F. Tinker12, Kari E. North37, Nikolaus Becker38, Yolanda Benavente, Paolo Boffetta39, Paul Brennan5, Lenka Foretova, Marc Maynadie40, Anthony Staines41, Tracy Lightfoot21, Simon Crouch21, Alex Smith21, Eve Roman21, W. Ryan Diver22, Kenneth Offit3, Andrew D. Zelenetz3, Robert J. Klein3, Danylo J. Villano3, Tongzhang Zheng42, Yawei Zhang42, Theodore R. Holford42, Anne Kricker43, Jenny Turner44, Melissa C. Southey15, Jacqueline Clavel, Jarmo Virtamo45, Stephanie J. Weinstein2, Elio Riboli46, Paolo Vineis17, Rudolph Kaaks38, Dimitrios Trichopoulos47, Dimitrios Trichopoulos24, Roel Vermeulen8, Heiner Boeing, Anne Tjønneland, Emanuele Angelucci, Simonetta Di Lollo48, Marco Rais26, Brenda M. Birmann24, Francine Laden24, Edward Giovannucci24, Peter Kraft24, Jinyan Huang24, Baoshan Ma24, Baoshan Ma49, Yuanqing Ye19, Brian C.-H. Chiu50, Joshua N. Sampson2, Liming Liang24, Ju-Hyun Park51, Charles C. Chung2, Dennis D. Weisenburger6, Nilanjan Chatterjee2, Joseph F. Fraumeni2, Susan L. Slager1, Xifeng Wu19, Silvia de Sanjosé, Karin E. Smedby33, Gilles Salles4, Gilles Salles52, Christine F. Skibola7, Nathaniel Rothman2, Stephen J. Chanock2 
Mayo Clinic1, National Institutes of Health2, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center3, Centre national de la recherche scientifique4, International Agency for Research on Cancer5, City of Hope National Medical Center6, University of California, Berkeley7, Utrecht University8, University of Freiburg9, Emory University10, Drexel University11, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center12, University of British Columbia13, Simon Fraser University14, University of Melbourne15, Cancer Council Victoria16, Statens Serum Institut17, Stanford University18, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center19, Ohio State University20, University of York21, American Cancer Society22, University of New South Wales23, Harvard University24, Public Health England25, University of Cagliari26, New York University27, Westat28, University of Alabama at Birmingham29, University of Iowa30, University of Paris31, Uppsala University32, Karolinska Institutet33, University of California, San Francisco34, University of Southern California35, Wayne State University36, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill37, German Cancer Research Center38, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai39, University of Burgundy40, Dublin City University41, Yale University42, University of Sydney43, Macquarie University44, National Institute for Health and Welfare45, Imperial College London46, Academy of Athens47, University of Florence48, Dalian Maritime University49, University of Chicago50, Dongguk University51, Claude Bernard University Lyon 152
04 Dec 2014
TL;DR: This paper conducted a meta-analysis of three new genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and 1 previous scan, totaling 3,857 cases and 7,666 controls of European ancestry, with additional genotyping of 9 promising SNPs in 1,359 cases and 4,557 controls.
Abstract: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma subtype and is clinically aggressive. To identify genetic susceptibility loci for DLBCL, we conducted a meta-analysis of 3 new genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and 1 previous scan, totaling 3,857 cases and 7,666 controls of European ancestry, with additional genotyping of 9 promising SNPs in 1,359 cases and 4,557 controls. In our multi-stage analysis, five independent SNPs in four loci achieved genome-wide significance marked by rs116446171 at 6p25.3 (EXOC2; P = 2.33 × 10(-21)), rs2523607 at 6p21.33 (HLA-B; P = 2.40 × 10(-10)), rs79480871 at 2p23.3 (NCOA1; P = 4.23 × 10(-8)) and two independent SNPs, rs13255292 and rs4733601, at 8q24.21 (PVT1; P = 9.98 × 10(-13) and 3.63 × 10(-11), respectively). These data provide substantial new evidence for genetic susceptibility to this B cell malignancy and point to pathways involved in immune recognition and immune function in the pathogenesis of DLBCL.

128 citations


Authors

Showing all 1345 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Walter C. Willett3342399413322
Meir J. Stampfer2771414283776
Frank B. Hu2501675253464
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Edward Giovannucci2061671179875
Irving L. Weissman2011141172504
Bernard Rosner1901162147661
Susan E. Hankinson15178988297
Paolo Boffetta148145593876
Jeffrey A. Bluestone14351577080
Richard D. Smith140118079758
Garth D. Illingworth13750561793
Brian E. Henderson13771269921
Ahmedin Jemal132500380474
Michael J. Thun12939279051
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
92.5K papers, 4.7M citations

89% related

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
65.3K papers, 4.4M citations

89% related

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
30.9K papers, 2.2M citations

88% related

Mayo Clinic
169.5K papers, 8.1M citations

86% related

University of California, San Francisco
186.2K papers, 12M citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202312
20228
2021202
2020239
2019222
2018194