scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

American Cancer Society

NonprofitAtlanta, Georgia, United States
About: American Cancer Society is a nonprofit organization based out in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Population. The organization has 1339 authors who have published 3700 publications receiving 688166 citations. The organization is also known as: American Cancer Society, ACS & American Society for the Control of Cancer.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
15 Sep 2015-Cancer
TL;DR: The aim of the cost‐sharing provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was to reduce financial barriers for preventive services, including screening for colorectal cancer and breast cancer among privately and Medicare‐insured individuals.
Abstract: BACKGROUND The aim of the cost-sharing provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was to reduce financial barriers for preventive services, including screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and breast cancer (BC) among privately and Medicare-insured individuals. Whether the provision has affected CRC and BC screening prevalence is unknown. The current study investigated whether CRC and BC screening prevalence among privately and Medicare-insured adults by socioeconomic status (SES) changed before and after the ACA. METHODS Data obtained from the National Health Interview Survey pertaining to privately and Medicare-insured adults from 2008 (before the ACA) and 2013 (after the ACA) were used. There were 15,786 adults aged 50 to 75 years in the CRC screening analysis and 14,530 women aged ≥40 years in the BC screening analysis. Changes in guideline-recommended screening between 2008 and 2013 by SES were expressed as the prevalence difference (PD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) adjusted for demographics, insurance, income, education, body mass index, and having a usual provider. RESULTS Overall, CRC screening prevalence increased from 57.3% to 61.2% between 2008 and 2013 (P<.001). Adjusted CRC screening prevalence during the corresponding period increased in low-income (PD, 5.9; 95% CI, 1.8 to 10.2), least-educated (PD, 7.2; 95% CI, 0.9 to 13.5), and Medicare-insured (PD, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.7 to 10.7) individuals, but not in high-income, most-educated, and privately insured respondents. BC screening remained unchanged overall (70.5% in 2008 vs 70.2% in 2013) and in the low SES groups. CONCLUSIONS Increases in CRC screening prevalence between 2008 and 2013 were confined to respondents with low SES. These findings may in part reflect the ACA's removal of financial barriers. Cancer 2015;121:3272–3280. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

100 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although generally not statistically significant, these results agree with the EPA summary estimate that spousal smoking increases lung cancer risk by about 20 percent in never-smoking women.
Abstract: Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) has been classified as a human lung carcinogen by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), based both on the chemical similarity of sidestream and mainstream smoke and on slightly higher lung cancer risk in never-smokers whose spouses smoke compared with those married to nonsmokers. We evaluated the relation between ETS and lung cancer prospectively in the US, among 114,286 female and 19,549 male never-smokers, married to smokers, compared with about 77,000 female and 77,000 male never-smokers whose spouses did not smoke. Multivariate analyses, based on 247 lung cancer deaths, controlled for age, race, diet, and occupation. Dose-response analyses were restricted to 92,222 women whose husbands provided complete information on cigarette smoking and date of marriage. Lung cancer death rates, adjusted for other factors, were 20 percent higher among women whose husbands ever smoked during the current marriage than among those married to never-smokers (relative risk [RR]=1.2, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.8-1.6). For never-smoking men whose wives smoked, the RR was 1.1 (CI=0.6-1.8). Risk among women was similar or higher when the husband continued to smoke (RR=1.2, CI=0.8-1.8), or smoked 40 or more cigarettes per day (RR=1.9, CI=1.0-3.6), but did not increase with years of marriage to a smoker. Most CIs included the null. Although generally not statistically significant, these results agree with the EPA summary estimate that spousal smoking increases lung cancer risk by about 20 percent in never-smoking women. Even large prospective studies have limited statistical power to measure precisely the risk from ETS.

100 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
15 Aug 1999-Cancer
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the feasibility of reaching the American Cancer Society (ACS) challenge goals by estimating future changes in cancer rates that can result from past and future reductions in cancer risk factors.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Cancer incidence and mortality rates both began to decline in the U. S. in the early 1990s. Recognizing the unprecedented potential benefits of accelerating this decline, the American Cancer Society (ACS) has set ambitious challenge goals for the American public for a 25% reduction in cancer incidence rates and a 50% reduction in cancer mortality rates by the year 2015. This analysis examined the feasibility of reaching those goals by estimating future changes in cancer rates that can result from past and future reductions in cancer risk factors. METHODS Estimates for future declines in cancer risk factors in the U. S. under alternative scenarios were applied to conservative population-attributable risk estimates for cancer incidence and mortality rates in 1990 to estimate cancer rate trends in the year 2015. RESULTS If the current trends toward a decline in the prevalence of cancer risk factors continue over the next decade, by the year 2015 one can expect a 13% decline in cancer incidence rates and a 21% decline in cancer mortality rates below their 1990 levels. With redoubled efforts to reduce the prevalence of known cancer risk factors further, by the year 2015 cancer incidence rates could be reduced by 19% and cancer mortality rates reduced by 29%. Such redoubled efforts would equate to approximately 100,000 cancer cases and 60,000 cancer deaths prevented each year by the year 2015. CONCLUSIONS Past reductions in cancer risk factors in the U.S. population have led to recent declines in the rates of cancer incidence and mortality in the U.S. Redoubled efforts to act on current knowledge regarding how to prevent, detect, and treat cancer can result in attaining approximately 80% of the ACS challenge goal for cancer incidence rates and 60% of the ACS challenge goal for cancer mortality rates by the year 2015. New findings from cancer research are needed and will have to be applied quickly if the ACS challenge goals are to be met fully. Cancer 1999;86:715–27. © 1999 American Cancer Society.

100 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Ying Han1, Kristin A. Rand1, Dennis J. Hazelett1, Sue A. Ingles1, Rick A. Kittles2, Sara S. Strom3, Benjamin A. Rybicki4, Barbara Nemesure5, William B. Isaacs6, Janet L. Stanford7, Janet L. Stanford8, Wei Zheng9, Fredrick R. Schumacher1, Sonja I. Berndt10, Zhaoming Wang10, Zhaoming Wang11, Jianfeng Xu12, Nadin Rohland13, Nadin Rohland14, Nadin Rohland15, David Reich15, David Reich13, Arti Tandon15, Arti Tandon13, Bogdan Pasaniuc16, Alex Allen13, Alex Allen15, Dominique Quinque13, Dominique Quinque15, Swapan Mallick13, Swapan Mallick15, Dimple Notani14, Michael G. Rosenfeld14, Ranveer Singh Jayani14, Suzanne Kolb7, Susan M. Gapstur17, Victoria L. Stevens17, Curtis A. Pettaway3, Edward D. Yeboah18, Edward D. Yeboah19, Yao Tettey18, Yao Tettey19, Richard B. Biritwum19, Richard B. Biritwum18, Andrew A. Adjei19, Andrew A. Adjei18, Evelyn Tay18, Evelyn Tay19, Ann Truelove20, Shelley Niwa20, Anand P. Chokkalingam21, Esther M. John22, Esther M. John23, Adam B. Murphy24, Lisa B. Signorello15, John D. Carpten25, John D. Carpten1, M. Cristina Leske5, Suh Yuh Wu5, Anslem J.M. Hennis26, Anslem J.M. Hennis5, Christine Neslund-Dudas4, Ann W. Hsing22, Ann W. Hsing23, Lisa Chu22, Lisa Chu23, Phyllis J. Goodman7, Eric A. Klein27, S. Lilly Zheng28, John S. Witte29, Graham Casey1, Alex Lubwama30, Loreall Pooler1, Xin Sheng1, Gerhard A. Coetzee1, Michael B. Cook10, Stephen J. Chanock10, Daniel O. Stram1, Stephen Watya30, William J. Blot15, William J. Blot9, David V. Conti1, Brian E. Henderson1, Christopher A. Haiman1 
TL;DR: This study conducted fine mapping of the 8q24 risk region in search of novel associations with common and rare variation in men of African ancestry and identified three independent associations at P values of less than 5.00×10(-8).
Abstract: The 8q24 region harbors multiple risk variants for distinct cancers, including >8 for prostate cancer. In this study, we conducted fine mapping of the 8q24 risk region (127.8-128.8Mb) in search of novel associations with common and rare variation in 4853 prostate cancer case patients and 4678 control subjects of African ancestry. All statistical tests were two-sided. We identified three independent associations at P values of less than 5.00×10(-8), all of which were replicated in studies from Ghana and Uganda (combined sample = 5869 case patients, 5615 control subjects; rs114798100: risk allele frequency [RAF] = 0.04, per-allele odds ratio [OR] = 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.04 to 2.61, P = 2.38×10(-40); rs72725879: RAF = 0.33, OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.30 to 1.45, P = 3.04×10(-27); and rs111906932: RAF = 0.03, OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.53 to 2.08, P = 1.39×10(-13)). Risk variants rs114798100 and rs111906923 are only found in men of African ancestry, with rs111906923 representing a novel association signal. The three variants are located within or near a number of prostate cancer-associated long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), including PRNCR1, PCAT1, and PCAT2. These findings highlight ancestry-specific risk variation and implicate prostate-specific lncRNAs at the 8q24 prostate cancer susceptibility region.

100 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
13 Sep 2013-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: This paper developed an absolute risk model to identify individuals in the general population at elevated risk of pancreatic cancer, using data on 3,349 cases and 3,654 controllable cases.
Abstract: PURPOSE: We developed an absolute risk model to identify individuals in the general population at elevated risk of pancreatic cancer.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using data on 3,349 cases and 3,654 contro ...

100 citations


Authors

Showing all 1345 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Walter C. Willett3342399413322
Meir J. Stampfer2771414283776
Frank B. Hu2501675253464
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Edward Giovannucci2061671179875
Irving L. Weissman2011141172504
Bernard Rosner1901162147661
Susan E. Hankinson15178988297
Paolo Boffetta148145593876
Jeffrey A. Bluestone14351577080
Richard D. Smith140118079758
Garth D. Illingworth13750561793
Brian E. Henderson13771269921
Ahmedin Jemal132500380474
Michael J. Thun12939279051
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
92.5K papers, 4.7M citations

89% related

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
65.3K papers, 4.4M citations

89% related

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
30.9K papers, 2.2M citations

88% related

Mayo Clinic
169.5K papers, 8.1M citations

86% related

University of California, San Francisco
186.2K papers, 12M citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202312
20228
2021202
2020239
2019222
2018194