scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

American Cancer Society

NonprofitAtlanta, Georgia, United States
About: American Cancer Society is a nonprofit organization based out in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Population. The organization has 1339 authors who have published 3700 publications receiving 688166 citations. The organization is also known as: American Cancer Society, ACS & American Society for the Control of Cancer.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Nikos Papadimitriou1, Niki Dimou1, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis2, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis3, Barbara L. Banbury4, Richard M. Martin5, Richard M. Martin6, Sarah J Lewis6, Nabila Kazmi6, Timothy Robinson6, Demetrius Albanes7, Krasimira Aleksandrova, Sonja I. Berndt7, D Timothy Bishop8, Hermann Brenner9, Daniel D Buchanan10, Daniel D Buchanan11, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Peter T. Campbell12, Sergi Castellví-Bel13, Andrew T. Chan14, Jenny Chang-Claude15, Jenny Chang-Claude9, Merete Ellingjord-Dale2, Jane C. Figueiredo16, Jane C. Figueiredo17, Steven J Gallinger18, Graham G. Giles10, Graham G. Giles19, Edward Giovannucci14, Stephen B. Gruber16, Andrea Gsur, Jochen Hampe20, Heather Hampel21, Sophia Harlid22, Tabitha A. Harrison4, Michael Hoffmeister9, John L. Hopper10, John L. Hopper23, Li Hsu24, Li Hsu4, José María Huerta, Jeroen R. Huyghe4, Mark A. Jenkins10, Temitope O. Keku25, Tilman Kühn9, Carlo La Vecchia26, Loic Le Marchand, Christopher I. Li4, Li Li27, Annika Lindblom28, Annika Lindblom29, Noralane M Lindor30, Brigid M. Lynch19, Brigid M. Lynch10, Brigid M. Lynch31, Sanford D. Markowitz32, Giovanna Masala33, Anne M. May34, Roger L. Milne10, Roger L. Milne19, Evelyn M. Monninkhof34, Lorena Moreno13, Victor Moreno13, Polly A. Newcomb24, Polly A. Newcomb4, Kenneth Offit35, Kenneth Offit36, Vittorio Perduca37, Vittorio Perduca38, Vittorio Perduca39, Paul D.P. Pharoah40, Elizabeth A Platz41, John D. Potter4, Gad Rennert42, Elio Riboli2, Maria J. Sánchez43, Stephanie L. Schmit16, Stephanie L. Schmit44, Robert E Schoen45, Gianluca Severi, Sabina Sieri, Martha L. Slattery46, Mingyang Song14, Catherine M. Tangen4, Stephen N. Thibodeau30, Ruth C. Travis47, Antonia Trichopoulou, Cornelia M. Ulrich48, Fränzel J.B. van Duijnhoven49, Bethany Van Guelpen22, Pavel Vodicka50, Pavel Vodicka51, Pavel Vodicka52, Emily White24, Emily White4, Alicja Wolk29, Michael O. Woods53, Anna H. Wu16, Ulrike Peters4, Ulrike Peters24, Marc J. Gunter1, Neil Murphy1 
International Agency for Research on Cancer1, Imperial College London2, University of Ioannina3, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center4, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust5, University of Bristol6, National Institutes of Health7, University of Leeds8, German Cancer Research Center9, University of Melbourne10, Royal Melbourne Hospital11, American Cancer Society12, University of Barcelona13, Harvard University14, University of Hamburg15, University of Southern California16, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center17, University of Toronto18, Cancer Council Victoria19, Dresden University of Technology20, Ohio State University21, Umeå University22, Seoul National University23, University of Washington24, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill25, University of Milan26, University of Virginia27, Karolinska University Hospital28, Karolinska Institutet29, Mayo Clinic30, The Heart Research Institute31, Case Western Reserve University32, Prevention Institute33, Utrecht University34, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center35, Cornell University36, Institut Gustave Roussy37, Université Paris-Saclay38, Paris Descartes University39, University of Cambridge40, Johns Hopkins University41, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine42, Andalusian School of Public Health43, University of South Florida44, University of Pittsburgh45, University of Utah46, University of Oxford47, Huntsman Cancer Institute48, Wageningen University and Research Centre49, Charles University in Prague50, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic51, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague52, Memorial University of Newfoundland53
TL;DR: Two-sample Mendelian randomisation analyses using summary genetic data from the UK Biobank and GWA consortia found that a one standard deviation increment in average acceleration was associated with lower risks of breast cancer and colorectal cancer.
Abstract: Physical activity has been associated with lower risks of breast and colorectal cancer in epidemiological studies; however, it is unknown if these associations are causal or confounded. In two-sample Mendelian randomisation analyses, using summary genetic data from the UK Biobank and GWA consortia, we found that a one standard deviation increment in average acceleration was associated with lower risks of breast cancer (odds ratio [OR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27 to 0.98, P-value = 0.04) and colorectal cancer (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.90, P-value = 0.01). We found similar magnitude inverse associations for estrogen positive (ER+ve) breast cancer and for colon cancer. Our results support a potentially causal relationship between higher physical activity levels and lower risks of breast cancer and colorectal cancer. Based on these data, the promotion of physical activity is probably an effective strategy in the primary prevention of these commonly diagnosed cancers.

92 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The number of cutaneous melanomas attributable to UVR worldwide quantified underline the need for public health action, an increasing awareness of melanoma and its risk factors, and the need to promote changes in behavior that decrease sun exposure at all ages.
Abstract: Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is a strong and ubiquitous risk factor for cutaneous melanoma, emitted naturally by the sun but also artificial sources. To shed light on the potential impact of interventions seeking to reduce exposure to UVR in both high and low risk populations, we quantified the number of cutaneous melanomas attributable to UVR worldwide. Population attributable fractions and numbers of new melanoma cases in adults due to ambient UVR were calculated by age and sex for 153 countries by comparing the current melanoma burden with historical data, i.e., the melanoma burden observed in a population with minimal exposure to UVR. Secondary analyses were performed using contemporary melanoma incidence rates in dark-skinned African populations with low UVR susceptibility as reference. Globally, an estimated 168,000 new melanoma cases were attributable to excess UVR in 2012, corresponding to 75.7% of all new melanoma cases and 1.2% of all new cancer cases. This burden was concentrated in very highly developed countries with 149,000 attributable cases and was most pronounced in Oceania, where 96% of all melanomas (representing 9.3% of the total cancer burden) were attributable to excess UVR. There would be approximately 151,000 fewer melanoma cases worldwide were incidence rates in every population equivalent to those observed in selected low-risk (dark-skinned, heavily pigmented) reference populations. These findings underline the need for public health action, an increasing awareness of melanoma and its risk factors, and the need to promote changes in behavior that decrease sun exposure at all ages.

91 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
15 Oct 2002-Cancer
TL;DR: The purpose of the current study was to provide health professionals, professional organizations, policy makers, and the general public with a practical blueprint for increasing the practice of screening for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and adenomatous polyps over the next decade.
Abstract: BACKGROUND. The purpose of the current study was to provide health professionals, professional organizations, policy makers, and the general public with a practical blueprint for increasing the practice of screening for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and adenomatous polyps over the next decade. The National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable (NCCRT) was founded in 1997 by the American Cancer Society and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to provide strategic leadership, advocacy, long-range planning, and coordination of interventions targeted at reducing the disease burden of CRC through education, early detection, and prevention. The NCCRT and its three workgroups include CRC survivors; recognized experts in primary care, gastroenterology, radiology, colorectal surgery, nursing, public policy, epidemiology, and behavioral science; patient advocates; and representatives of health plans and insurers, government, and other organizations. METHODS. The NCCRT performed a literature review of published and unpublished data related to CRC screening guidelines, compliance, and barriers to adherence, as well as test effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Members of the three NCCRT workgroups developed summary reports regarding professional education, public education and awareness, and health policy. A drafting committee developed the final strategic plan from workgroup reports, which was reviewed by the entire NCCRT membership, amended, and subsequently approved in final form.

91 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: Investigation of whether consumption of carbohydrates with high dietary glycemic index would predict risk of postmenopausal breast cancer among 63,307 United States women in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort found no associations.
Abstract: Insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) are associated with increased risk of breast cancer in several studies. Circulating concentrations of insulin increase with dietary consumption of high glycemic index foods, which, in turn, may influence IGF-I levels or activity, but the relevance of such dietary patterns for breast cancer risk is unclear. We investigated whether consumption of carbohydrates with high dietary glycemic index would predict risk of postmenopausal breast cancer among 63,307 United States women in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort. From baseline in 1992, participants 40-87 years of age and free from cancer and diabetes, were followed for 5 years; 1442 incident breast cancer cases were documented. Diet was assessed at baseline by a validated 68-item food frequency questionnaire from which we calculated dietary glycemic index and glycemic load. Dietary glycemic index and load were not associated with increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer (rate ratio = 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.22 and rate ratio = 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.08, respectively) after adjustment for multiple breast cancer risk factors. Associations were not modified by body mass index, physical activity, hormone use, or stage of disease. Future evaluations of glycemic index and breast cancer risk may be strengthened by longer follow-up, more complete dietary information, and measurement of plasma insulin and IGF-I levels.

91 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The meta-analysis suggests that meat consumption, particularly red meat, increases endometrial cancer risk and the current literature does not support an association with dairy products, while the evidence is inconsistent for poultry, fish, and eggs.
Abstract: This article summarizes and quantifies the current evidence relating dietary intake of animal products and endometrial cancer. Literature searches were conducted to identify peer-reviewed manuscripts published up to December 2006. Twenty-two manuscripts from three cohort studies and 16 case-control studies were identified. One of these cohort studies evaluated only fried meat and another only milk consumption; they were not included in our meta-analyses. The third cohort study identified did not present exposure levels and could not be included in dose-response meta-analysis. This cohort study did not show an association with meat or red meat consumption. Random-effects dose-response summary estimates for case-control studies evaluating these foods were 1.26 (95% CI: 1.03-1.54) per 100 g/day of total meat, 1.51 (95% CI: 1.19-1.93) per 100 g/day of red meat, 1.03 (95% CI: 0.32-3.28) per 100 g/day of poultry, 1.04 (95% CI: 0.55-1.98) per 100 g/day of fish, and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93-1.01) per serving of dairy. Our meta-analysis, based on case-control data, suggests that meat consumption, particularly red meat, increases endometrial cancer risk. The current literature does not support an association with dairy products, while the evidence is inconsistent for poultry, fish, and eggs. More studies, particularly prospective studies, are needed.

91 citations


Authors

Showing all 1345 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Walter C. Willett3342399413322
Meir J. Stampfer2771414283776
Frank B. Hu2501675253464
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Edward Giovannucci2061671179875
Irving L. Weissman2011141172504
Bernard Rosner1901162147661
Susan E. Hankinson15178988297
Paolo Boffetta148145593876
Jeffrey A. Bluestone14351577080
Richard D. Smith140118079758
Garth D. Illingworth13750561793
Brian E. Henderson13771269921
Ahmedin Jemal132500380474
Michael J. Thun12939279051
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
92.5K papers, 4.7M citations

89% related

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
65.3K papers, 4.4M citations

89% related

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
30.9K papers, 2.2M citations

88% related

Mayo Clinic
169.5K papers, 8.1M citations

86% related

University of California, San Francisco
186.2K papers, 12M citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202312
20228
2021202
2020239
2019222
2018194