scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Arkansas Department of Education published in 2013"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors study the retirement patterns of couples in a multi-country setting using data from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe and find a significative joint retirement effect for women of 21 percentage points.
Abstract: In this paper we study the retirement patterns of couples in a multi-country setting using data from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe. In particular we test whether women's (men's) transitions out of the labor force are directly related to the actual realization of their husbands' (wives') transition, using the institutional variation in country-specific early and full statutory retirement ages to instrument the latter. Exploiting the discontinuities in retirement behavior across countries, we find a significative joint retirement effect for women of 21 percentage points. For men, the estimated effect is insignificant. Our empirical strategy allows us to give a causal interpretation to the effect we estimate. In addition, this effect has important implications for policy analysis.

48 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the effect of retirement on subjective well-being by using longitudinal data to tease out the retirement effect from age and cohort differences; using instrumental variables to address potential reverse causation of subjective wellbeing on retirement decisions; and conducting cross-country analyses, exploiting differences in eligibility ages for retirement benefits across countries and within countries.
Abstract: How does retirement influence subjective well-being? Some studies suggest retirement does not affect subjective well-being or may improve it. Others suggest it adversely affects it. This paper aims at advancing our understanding of the effect of retirement on subjective well-being by (1) using longitudinal data to tease out the retirement effect from age and cohort differences; (2) using instrumental variables to address potential reverse causation of subjective well-being on retirement decisions; and (3) conducting cross-country analyses, exploiting differences in eligibility ages for retirement benefits across countries and within countries. We use panel data from the US Health and Retirement Study and the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe. This allows us to use a quasi-experimental approach where variations in public pension eligibility due to country and cohort specific retirement ages help identify retirement effects. For both the U.S. and Europe we find that retirement is associated with higher levels of depression. However, when we use instrumental variables we find the opposite result. Retirement induced through Social Security pension eligibility is found to have a positive effect, reducing depression symptoms, although only marginally significant for the U.S. when considering the depression indicator. Retirement is not found to have a significant effect on life satisfaction measures for either the U.S. or Europe.

14 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors investigated the relation between various evaluative and experienced well-being measures based on the English Longitudinal Study of Aging, the Gallup Wellbeing Index, and a 12-item Hedonic Well-Being module.
Abstract: Using the American Life Panel, we conduct an experiment to investigate the relations between various evaluative and experienced well-being measures based on the English Longitudinal Study of Aging, the Gallup Wellbeing Index, and a 12-item Hedonic Well-Being module. We find that all evaluative measures load on the same factor, but the positive and negative experienced affect measures load on different factors. We find evidence of an effect of response scales on both the estimated number of underlying factors and their relations with demographics. We conclude that finer scales allowing more nuanced answers offer more reliability

6 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss seven reasons for consultee resistance to academic or behavioral interventions: lack of knowledge or skills, need for consultative modifications, difficulties with the transfer of training, difficulty with transfer due to "conditions of emotionality", lack of consultee motivation or consultant accountability, inconsistency, and the presence of "special situations".
Abstract: Some consultees resist implementing, or implementing with integrity, effective academic or behavioral interventions that their consultants believe are needed to resolve specific student problems. In order to address consultee resistance, it is recommended that consultants complete functional assessments to determine the underlying reasons for the resistance so that the results can be linked to strategic or intensive consultative intervention(s). Seven “high hit” reasons to explain consultee resistance are discussed: (a) a lack of knowledge or skills, (b) the need for consultative modifications, (c) difficulties with the transfer of training, (d) difficulties with the transfer due to “conditions of emotionality,” (e) the lack of consultee motivation or consultant accountability, (f) inconsistency, and (g) the presence of “special situations.” These are linked with possible consultative interventions that are focused on eliminating a consultee's resistance, resulting in the implementation of an effective in...

3 citations


Posted Content
TL;DR: The authors examined what factors predict why some parents enroll their children in voucher schools while other parents with similar types of children and from similar neighborhoods do not, and investigated how aware parents are of their educational options, where they get their information, and what school characteristics they deem the most important.
Abstract: We examine what factors predict why some parents enroll their children in voucher schools while other parents with similar types of children and from similar neighborhoods do not. Furthermore, we investigate how aware parents are of their educational options, where they get their information, and what school characteristics they deem the most important. To answer these questions, we analyze the school choice patterns in the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. Using survey data, we compare responses from a representative sample of voucher parents and a matched sample of public school parents. While public school parents have higher incomes than voucher parents do, voucher parents have more years of education on average. We find that parents in both sectors rely heavily on their social networks to gain information about school options. Finally, we conclude that religion plays an important role in explaining why some parents use vouchers while others do not.

1 citations