scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Bauhaus University, Weimar

EducationWeimar, Thüringen, Germany
About: Bauhaus University, Weimar is a education organization based out in Weimar, Thüringen, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Finite element method & Isogeometric analysis. The organization has 1421 authors who have published 2998 publications receiving 104454 citations. The organization is also known as: Bauhaus-Universität Weimar & Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Trivariate NURBS (non-uniform rational B-splines) representation of composite panels which is suitable for three-dimensional isogeometric analysis (IGA) is constructed with a new curve/surface offset algorithm, providing a bi-directional system to facilitate the design of composite structures.
Abstract: Trivariate NURBS (non-uniform rational B-splines) representation of composite panels which is suitable for three-dimensional isogeometric analysis (IGA) is constructed with a new curve/surface offset algorithm. The proposed offset algorithm, which is required by IGA, is non-existent in the CAD literature. Using the presented approach, finite element analysis of composite panels can be performed with the only input being the geometry representation of the composite surface. The method proposed provides a bi-directional system in which one can go forward from CAD to analysis and backwards from analysis to CAD. This is believed to facilitate the design of composite structures. Different parts (patches) can be parametrized independently of each other and glued together, in the finite element solver, by a discontinuous Galerkin method. A stress analysis of curved composite panel with stiffeners is provided to demonstrate the proposed framework.

29 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The two molecular mechanics models, the stick-spiral and the beam models, predict considerably different mechanical properties of materials based on energy equivalence, and the maximum difference of the predicted mechanical properties can exceed 300% in different loading modes.
Abstract: We show that the two molecular mechanics models, the stick-spiral and the beam models, predict considerably different mechanical properties of materials based on energy equivalence. The difference between the two models is independent of the materials since all parameters of the beam model are obtained from the harmonic potentials. We demonstrate this difference for finite width graphene nanoribbons and a single polyethylene chain comparing results of the molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with harmonic potentials and the finite element method with the beam model. We also find that the difference strongly depends on the loading modes, chirality and width of the graphene nanoribbons, and it increases with decreasing width of the nanoribbons under pure bending condition. The maximum difference of the predicted mechanical properties using the two models can exceed 300% in different loading modes. Comparing the two models with the MD results of AIREBO potential, we find that the stick-spiral model overestimates and the beam model underestimates the mechanical properties in narrow armchair graphene nanoribbons under pure bending condition.

29 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The construction of basis functions of degree p ≥ 2 which are C 1 continuous across the common boundaries shared by the patches, and the usage of partial degree elevation to overcome the problem of over-constrained solution space locking.

29 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The isogeometric analysis (IGA) is applied for the weakly singular symmetric Galerkin boundary element method (SGBEM) to analyzelinear elastostatics problems in three-dimensional domains and produces highly accurate results.

29 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
21 Aug 2017
TL;DR: A combination of kernel density estimation and a genetic algorithm is used to rescale a given attribute-value profile to a given variability model and the solution is shown to be agnostic about the given input distribution and to scale to large variability models.
Abstract: Variability models are often enriched with attributes, such as performance, that encode the influence of features on the respective attribute. In spite of their importance, there are only few attributed variability models available that have attribute values obtained from empirical, real-world observations and that cover interactions between features. But, what does it mean for research and practice when staying in the comfort zone of developing algorithms and tools in a setting where artificial attribute values are used and where interactions are neglected? This is the central question that we want to answer here. To leave the comfort zone, we use a combination of kernel density estimation and a genetic algorithm to rescale a given (real-world) attribute-value profile to a given variability model. To demonstrate the influence and relevance of realistic attribute values and interactions, we present a replication of a widely recognized, third-party study, into which we introduce realistic attribute values and interactions. We found statistically significant differences between the original study and the replication. We infer lessons learned to conduct experiments that involve attributed variability models. We also provide the accompanying tool Thor for generating attribute values including interactions. Our solution is shown to be agnostic about the given input distribution and to scale to large variability models.

29 citations


Authors

Showing all 1443 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Timon Rabczuk9972735893
Adri C. T. van Duin7948926911
Paolo Rosso5654112757
Xiaoying Zhuang5427110082
Benno Stein533409880
Jin-Wu Jiang521757661
Gordon Wetzstein512589793
Goangseup Zi451538411
Bohayra Mortazavi441625802
Thorsten Hennig-Thurau4412317542
Jörg Hoffmann402007785
Martin Potthast401906563
Pedro M. A. Areias381075908
Amir Mosavi384326209
Guido De Roeck382748063
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Delft University of Technology
94.4K papers, 2.7M citations

83% related

Georgia Institute of Technology
119K papers, 4.6M citations

83% related

Carnegie Mellon University
104.3K papers, 5.9M citations

83% related

Eindhoven University of Technology
52.9K papers, 1.5M citations

82% related

Microsoft
86.9K papers, 4.1M citations

82% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202321
202260
2021224
2020249
2019247
2018273