scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Boise State University

EducationBoise, Idaho, United States
About: Boise State University is a education organization based out in Boise, Idaho, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 3698 authors who have published 8664 publications receiving 210163 citations. The organization is also known as: BSU & Boise State.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors found that self-esteem was the secondary predictor for bulimia, drive for thinness, and body dissatisfaction, while other predictor variables (self-esteem, high stress, poor coping skills, maladaptive perfectionism, gender) were the primary predictor of disordered eating.

99 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper reviews how remotely sensed data have been used to understand the impact of urbanization on global environmental change and how these studies can support the policy and science communities' increasing need for detailed and up-to-date information on the multiple dimensions of cities, including their social, biological, physical, and infrastructural characteristics.
Abstract: This paper reviews how remotely sensed data have been used to understand the impact of urbanization on global environmental change. We describe how these studies can support the policy and science communities' increasing need for detailed and up-to-date information on the multiple dimensions of cities, including their social, biological, physical, and infrastructural characteristics. Because the interactions between urban and surrounding areas are complex, a synoptic and spatial view offered from remote sensing is integral to measuring, modeling, and understanding these relationships. Here we focus on

99 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the critical shear stress was measured in a recirculating flume using samples of forest soil exposed to different temperatures (40� −550� C) for 1 hour.
Abstract: Received 26 February 2004; revised 15 September 2004; accepted 5 November 2004; published 22 January 2005. [1] Increased erosion is a well-known response after wildfire. To predict and to model erosion on a landscape scale requires knowledge of the critical shear stress for the initiation of motion of soil particles. As this soil property is temperature-dependent, a quantitative relation between critical shear stress and the temperatures to which the soils have been subjected during a wildfire is required. In this study the critical shear stress was measured in a recirculating flume using samples of forest soil exposed to different temperatures (40� –550� C) for 1 hour. Results were obtained for four replicates of soils derived from three different types of parent material (granitic bedrock, sandstone, and volcanic tuffs). In general, the relation between critical shear stress and temperature can be separated into three different temperature ranges ( 275� C), which are similar to those for water repellency and temperature. The critical shear stress was most variable (1.0–2.0 N m � 2 ) for temperatures 2.0 N m � 2 ) between 175� and 275� C, and was essentially constant (0.5–0.8 N m � 2 )f or temperatures >275� C. The changes in critical shear stress with temperature were found to be essentially independent of soil type and suggest that erosion processes in burned watersheds can be modeled more simply than erosion processes in unburned watersheds. Wildfire reduces the spatial variability of soil erodibility associated with unburned watersheds by eliminating the complex effects of vegetation in protecting soils and by reducing the range of cohesion associated with different types of unburned soils. Our results indicate that modeling the erosional response after a wildfire depends primarily on determining the spatial distribution of the maximum soil temperatures that were reached during the wildfire.

99 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a scattering-type equation is proposed to describe the sensitivity of electrical potential to both source and receiver positions, which is described by a scattering type equation and depends not only on source-receiver separation, but also on the location and magnitude of contrasts in electrical conductivity.
Abstract: SUMMARY Limitations of imaging using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) arise because of the difficulty of quantifying the reliability of tomographic images. A major source of uncertainty in tomographic inversion is data error. Data error due to electrode mislocations is characterized by the sensitivity of electrical potential to both source and receiver positions. This sensitivity is described by a scattering-type equation and, therefore, depends not only on source‐receiver separation, but also on the location and magnitude of contrasts in electrical conductivity. At the overlapping scales of near-surface environmental and engineering geophysical surveys, for which electrodes may be close to the target and experiment dimensions may be on the same order as those of the target, errors associated with electrode mislocations can significantly contaminate the ERT data and the reconstructed electrical conductivity. For synthetic experiments, variations in the data due to electrode mislocation are comparable in magnitude to typical experimental noise levels and, in some cases, may overwhelm variations in the data due to changes in material properties. Furthermore, the statistical distribution of electrode mislocation errors can be complicated and multimodal such that bias may be introduced into the ERT data. The resulting perturbations of the reconstructed electrical conductivity field due to electrode mislocations can be significant in magnitude with complex spatial distributions that are dependent both on the model and the experiment.

99 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, concentrated flow simulations on disturbed and undisturbed rangelands were used to estimate the erodibility and evaluate the performance of linear and power law equations that describe the relationship between erosion rate and several hydraulic parameters.
Abstract: [1] Current physically based overland flow erosion models for rangeland application do not separate disturbed and undisturbed conditions in modeling concentrated flow erosion In this study, concentrated flow simulations on disturbed and undisturbed rangelands were used to estimate the erodibility and to evaluate the performance of linear and power law equations that describe the relationship between erosion rate and several hydraulic parameters None of the hydraulic parameters consistently predicted the detachment capacity well for all sites, however, stream power performed better than most of other hydraulic parameters Using power law functions did not improve the detachment relation with respect to that of the linear function Concentrated flow erodibility increased significantly when a site was exposed to a disturbance such as fire or tree encroachment into sagebrush steppe This study showed that burning increases erosion by amplifying the erosive power of overland flow through removing obstacles and by changing the soil properties affecting erodibility itself However, the magnitude of fire impact varied among sites due to inherent differences in site characteristics and variability in burn severity In most cases we observed concentrated flow erodibility had a high value at overland flow initiation and then started to decline with time due to reduction of sediment availability Thus we developed an empirical function to predict erodibility variation within a runoff event as a function of cumulative unit discharge Empirical equations were also developed to predict erodibility variation with time postdisturbance as a function of readily available vegetation cover and surface soil texture data

99 citations


Authors

Showing all 3902 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Jeffrey G. Andrews11056263334
Zhu Han109140748725
Brian R. Flay8932526390
Jeffrey W. Elam8343524543
Pramod K. Varshney7989430834
Scott Fendorf7924421035
Gregory F. Ball7634221193
Yan Wang72125330710
David C. Dunand7252719212
Juan Carlos Diaz-Velez6433414252
Michael K. Lindell6218619865
Matthew J. Kohn6216413741
Maged Elkashlan6129414736
Bernard Yurke5824217897
Miguel Ferrer5847811560
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Arizona State University
109.6K papers, 4.4M citations

92% related

Pennsylvania State University
196.8K papers, 8.3M citations

91% related

University of Texas at Austin
206.2K papers, 9M citations

90% related

Texas A&M University
164.3K papers, 5.7M citations

90% related

University of New Mexico
64.7K papers, 2.5M citations

90% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202370
2022210
2021763
2020695
2019620
2018637