scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Broad Institute

NonprofitCambridge, Massachusetts, United States
About: Broad Institute is a nonprofit organization based out in Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Genome-wide association study. The organization has 6584 authors who have published 11618 publications receiving 1522743 citations. The organization is also known as: Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Vishvanath Nene1, Jennifer R. Wortman1, Daniel Lawson, Brian J. Haas1, Chinnappa D. Kodira2, Zhijian Jake Tu3, Brendan J. Loftus, Zhiyong Xi4, Karyn Megy, Manfred Grabherr2, Quinghu Ren1, Evgeny M. Zdobnov, Neil F. Lobo5, Kathryn S. Campbell6, Susan E. Brown7, Maria de Fatima Bonaldo8, Jingsong Zhu9, Steven P. Sinkins10, David G. Hogenkamp11, Paolo Amedeo1, Peter Arensburger9, Peter W. Atkinson9, Shelby L. Bidwell1, Jim Biedler3, Ewan Birney, Robert V. Bruggner5, Javier Costas, Monique R. Coy3, Jonathan Crabtree1, Matt Crawford2, Becky deBruyn5, David DeCaprio2, Karin Eiglmeier12, Eric Eisenstadt1, Hamza El-Dorry13, William M. Gelbart6, Suely Lopes Gomes13, Martin Hammond, Linda Hannick1, James R. Hogan5, Michael H. Holmes1, David M. Jaffe2, J. Spencer Johnston, Ryan C. Kennedy5, Hean Koo1, Saul A. Kravitz, Evgenia V. Kriventseva14, David Kulp15, Kurt LaButti2, Eduardo Lee1, Song Li3, Diane D. Lovin5, Chunhong Mao3, Evan Mauceli2, Carlos Frederico Martins Menck13, Jason R. Miller1, Philip Montgomery2, Akio Mori5, Ana L. T. O. Nascimento16, Horacio Naveira17, Chad Nusbaum2, Sinéad B. O'Leary2, Joshua Orvis1, Mihaela Pertea, Hadi Quesneville, Kyanne R. Reidenbach11, Yu-Hui Rogers, Charles Roth12, Jennifer R. Schneider5, Michael C. Schatz, Martin Shumway1, Mario Stanke, Eric O. Stinson5, Jose M. C. Tubio, Janice P. Vanzee11, Sergio Verjovski-Almeida13, Doreen Werner18, Owen White1, Stefan Wyder14, Qiandong Zeng2, Qi Zhao1, Yongmei Zhao1, Catherine A. Hill11, Alexander S. Raikhel9, Marcelo B. Soares8, Dennis L. Knudson7, Norman H. Lee, James E. Galagan2, Steven L. Salzberg, Ian T. Paulsen1, George Dimopoulos4, Frank H. Collins5, Bruce W. Birren2, Claire M. Fraser-Liggett, David W. Severson5 
22 Jun 2007-Science
TL;DR: A draft sequence of the genome of Aedes aegypti, the primary vector for yellow fever and dengue fever, which at approximately 1376 million base pairs is about 5 times the size of the genomes of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae was presented in this paper.
Abstract: We present a draft sequence of the genome of Aedes aegypti, the primary vector for yellow fever and dengue fever, which at approximately 1376 million base pairs is about 5 times the size of the genome of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Nearly 50% of the Ae. aegypti genome consists of transposable elements. These contribute to a factor of approximately 4 to 6 increase in average gene length and in sizes of intergenic regions relative to An. gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster. Nonetheless, chromosomal synteny is generally maintained among all three insects, although conservation of orthologous gene order is higher (by a factor of approximately 2) between the mosquito species than between either of them and the fruit fly. An increase in genes encoding odorant binding, cytochrome P450, and cuticle domains relative to An. gambiae suggests that members of these protein families underpin some of the biological differences between the two mosquito species.

1,107 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Helena Furberg1, Yunjung Kim1, Jennifer Dackor1, Eric Boerwinkle2, Nora Franceschini1, Diego Ardissino, Luisa Bernardinelli3, Luisa Bernardinelli4, Pier Mannuccio Mannucci5, Francesco Mauri, Piera Angelica Merlini, Devin Absher, Themistocles L. Assimes6, Stephen P. Fortmann6, Carlos Iribarren7, Joshua W. Knowles6, Thomas Quertermous6, Luigi Ferrucci8, Toshiko Tanaka8, Joshua C. Bis9, Curt D. Furberg10, Talin Haritunians11, Barbara McKnight9, Bruce M. Psaty9, Bruce M. Psaty12, Kent D. Taylor11, Evan L. Thacker9, Peter Almgren13, Leif Groop13, Claes Ladenvall13, Michael Boehnke14, Anne U. Jackson14, Karen L. Mohlke1, Heather M. Stringham14, Jaakko Tuomilehto15, Jaakko Tuomilehto16, Emelia J. Benjamin17, Shih-Jen Hwang8, Daniel Levy17, Sarah R. Preis8, Ramachandran S. Vasan17, Jubao Duan18, Pablo V. Gejman18, Douglas F. Levinson6, Alan R. Sanders18, Jianxin Shi8, Esther H. Lips19, James McKay19, Antonio Agudo, Luigi Barzan, Vladimir Bencko20, Simone Benhamou21, Simone Benhamou22, Xavier Castellsagué, Cristina Canova23, David I. Conway24, Eleonora Fabianova, Lenka Foretova, Vladimir Janout25, Claire M. Healy26, Ivana Holcatova20, Kristina Kjærheim, Pagona Lagiou27, Jolanta Lissowska, Ray Lowry28, Tatiana V. Macfarlane29, Dana Mates, Lorenzo Richiardi30, Peter Rudnai, Neonilia Szeszenia-Dabrowska31, David Zaridze32, Ariana Znaor, Mark Lathrop, Paul Brennan19, Stefania Bandinelli, Timothy M. Frayling33, Jack M. Guralnik8, Yuri Milaneschi, John R. B. Perry33, David Altshuler34, David Altshuler35, Roberto Elosua, S. Kathiresan35, S. Kathiresan34, Gavin Lucas, Olle Melander13, Christopher J. O'Donnell8, Veikko Salomaa16, Stephen M. Schwartz9, Benjamin F. Voight36, Brenda W.J.H. Penninx37, Johannes H. Smit37, Nicole Vogelzangs37, Dorret I. Boomsma37, Eco J. C. de Geus37, Jacqueline M. Vink37, Gonneke Willemsen37, Stephen J. Chanock8, Fangyi Gu35, Susan E. Hankinson35, David J. Hunter35, Albert Hofman38, Henning Tiemeier38, André G. Uitterlinden38, Cornelia M. van Duijn38, Stefan Walter38, Daniel I. Chasman35, Brendan M. Everett35, Guillaume Paré35, Paul M. Ridker35, Ming D. Li39, Hermine H. Maes40, Janet Audrain-McGovern41, Danielle Posthuma37, Laura M. Thornton1, Caryn Lerman41, Jaakko Kaprio16, Jaakko Kaprio15, Jed E. Rose42, John P. A. Ioannidis43, John P. A. Ioannidis44, Peter Kraft35, Danyu Lin1, Patrick F. Sullivan1 
TL;DR: A meta-analyses of several smoking phenotypes within cohorts of the Tobacco and Genetics Consortium found the strongest association was a synonymous 15q25 SNP in the nicotinic receptor gene CHRNA3, and three loci associated with number of cigarettes smoked per day were identified.
Abstract: Consistent but indirect evidence has implicated genetic factors in smoking behavior1,2. We report meta-analyses of several smoking phenotypes within cohorts of the Tobacco and Genetics Consortium (n = 74,053). We also partnered with the European Network of Genetic and Genomic Epidemiology (ENGAGE) and Oxford-GlaxoSmithKline (Ox-GSK) consortia to follow up the 15 most significant regions (n > 140,000). We identified three loci associated with number of cigarettes smoked per day. The strongest association was a synonymous 15q25 SNP in the nicotinic receptor gene CHRNA3 (rs1051730[A], b = 1.03, standard error (s.e.) = 0.053, beta = 2.8 x 10(-73)). Two 10q25 SNPs (rs1329650[G], b = 0.367, s. e. = 0.059, beta = 5.7 x 10(-10); and rs1028936[A], b = 0.446, s. e. = 0.074, beta = 1.3 x 10(-9)) and one 9q13 SNP in EGLN2 (rs3733829[G], b = 0.333, s. e. = 0.058, P = 1.0 x 10(-8)) also exceeded genome-wide significance for cigarettes per day. For smoking initiation, eight SNPs exceeded genome-wide significance, with the strongest association at a nonsynonymous SNP in BDNF on chromosome 11 (rs6265[C], odds ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.04-1.08, P = 1.8 x 10(-8)). One SNP located near DBH on chromosome 9 (rs3025343[G], OR = 1.12, 95% Cl 1.08-1.18, P = 3.6 x 10(-8)) was significantly associated with smoking cessation.

1,104 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Sushmita Roy1, Jason Ernst1, Peter V. Kharchenko2, Pouya Kheradpour1, Nicolas Nègre3, Matthew L. Eaton4, Jane M. Landolin5, Christopher A. Bristow1, Lijia Ma3, Michael F. Lin1, Stefan Washietl6, Bradley I. Arshinoff7, Ferhat Ay8, Patrick E. Meyer9, Nicolas Robine10, Nicole L. Washington5, Luisa Di Stefano2, Eugene Berezikov11, Christopher D. Brown3, Rogerio Candeias6, Joseph W. Carlson5, Adrian Carr12, Irwin Jungreis1, Daniel Marbach1, Rachel Sealfon1, Michael Y. Tolstorukov2, Sebastian Will6, Artyom A. Alekseyenko2, Carlo G. Artieri13, Benjamin W. Booth5, Angela N. Brooks14, Qi Dai10, Carrie A. Davis15, Michael O. Duff16, X. Feng, Andrey A. Gorchakov2, Tingting Gu17, Jorja G. Henikoff10, Philipp Kapranov18, Renhua Li13, Heather K. MacAlpine4, John H. Malone13, Aki Minoda5, Jared T. Nordman6, Katsutomo Okamura10, Marc D. Perry7, Sara K. Powell4, Nicole C. Riddle17, Akiko Sakai2, Anastasia Samsonova2, Jeremy E. Sandler5, Yuri B. Schwartz2, Noa Sher6, Rebecca Spokony3, David Sturgill13, Marijke J. van Baren17, Kenneth H. Wan5, Li Yang16, Charles Yu5, Elise A. Feingold13, Peter J. Good13, Mark S. Guyer13, Rebecca F. Lowdon13, Kami Ahmad2, Justen Andrews19, Bonnie Berger1, Steven E. Brenner14, Michael R. Brent17, Lucy Cherbas19, Sarah C. R. Elgin17, Thomas R. Gingeras18, Robert L. Grossman3, Roger A. Hoskins5, Thomas C. Kaufman19, W. J. Kent20, Mitzi I. Kuroda2, Terry L. Orr-Weaver6, Norbert Perrimon2, Vincenzo Pirrotta21, James W. Posakony22, Bing Ren22, Steven Russell12, Peter Cherbas19, Brenton R. Graveley16, Suzanna E. Lewis5, Gos Micklem12, Brian Oliver13, Peter J. Park2, Susan E. Celniker5, Steven Henikoff23, Gary H. Karpen14, Eric C. Lai10, David M. MacAlpine4, Lincoln Stein7, Kevin P. White3, Manolis Kellis1 
24 Dec 2010-Science
TL;DR: The Drosophila Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (modENCODE) project as mentioned in this paper has been used to map transcripts, histone modifications, chromosomal proteins, transcription factors, replication proteins and intermediates, and nucleosome properties across a developmental time course and in multiple cell lines.
Abstract: To gain insight into how genomic information is translated into cellular and developmental programs, the Drosophila model organism Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (modENCODE) project is comprehensively mapping transcripts, histone modifications, chromosomal proteins, transcription factors, replication proteins and intermediates, and nucleosome properties across a developmental time course and in multiple cell lines. We have generated more than 700 data sets and discovered protein-coding, noncoding, RNA regulatory, replication, and chromatin elements, more than tripling the annotated portion of the Drosophila genome. Correlated activity patterns of these elements reveal a functional regulatory network, which predicts putative new functions for genes, reveals stage- and tissue-specific regulators, and enables gene-expression prediction. Our results provide a foundation for directed experimental and computational studies in Drosophila and related species and also a model for systematic data integration toward comprehensive genomic and functional annotation.

1,102 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Aysu Okbay1, Jonathan P. Beauchamp2, Mark Alan Fontana3, James J. Lee4  +293 moreInstitutions (81)
26 May 2016-Nature
TL;DR: In this article, the results of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for educational attainment were reported, showing that single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with educational attainment disproportionately occur in genomic regions regulating gene expression in the fetal brain.
Abstract: Educational attainment is strongly influenced by social and other environmental factors, but genetic factors are estimated to account for at least 20% of the variation across individuals. Here we report the results of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for educational attainment that extends our earlier discovery sample of 101,069 individuals to 293,723 individuals, and a replication study in an independent sample of 111,349 individuals from the UK Biobank. We identify 74 genome-wide significant loci associated with the number of years of schooling completed. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with educational attainment are disproportionately found in genomic regions regulating gene expression in the fetal brain. Candidate genes are preferentially expressed in neural tissue, especially during the prenatal period, and enriched for biological pathways involved in neural development. Our findings demonstrate that, even for a behavioural phenotype that is mostly environmentally determined, a well-powered GWAS identifies replicable associated genetic variants that suggest biologically relevant pathways. Because educational attainment is measured in large numbers of individuals, it will continue to be useful as a proxy phenotype in efforts to characterize the genetic influences of related phenotypes, including cognition and neuropsychiatric diseases.

1,102 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An improved protocol significantly reduces amplification bias and minimizes the previously severe effects of PCR instrument and temperature ramp rate and identifies PCR during library preparation as a principal source of bias and optimized the conditions.
Abstract: Despite the ever-increasing output of Illumina sequencing data, loci with extreme base compositions are often under-represented or absent. To evaluate sources of base-composition bias, we traced genomic sequences ranging from 6% to 90% GC through the process by quantitative PCR. We identified PCR during library preparation as a principal source of bias and optimized the conditions. Our improved protocol significantly reduces amplification bias and minimizes the previously severe effects of PCR instrument and temperature ramp rate.

1,099 citations


Authors

Showing all 7146 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Eric S. Lander301826525976
Albert Hofman2672530321405
Frank B. Hu2501675253464
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Kari Stefansson206794174819
Mark J. Daly204763304452
Lewis C. Cantley196748169037
Matthew Meyerson194553243726
Gad Getz189520247560
Stacey Gabriel187383294284
Stuart H. Orkin186715112182
Ralph Weissleder1841160142508
Chris Sander178713233287
Michael I. Jordan1761016216204
Richard A. Young173520126642
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
34.6K papers, 5.2M citations

96% related

Salk Institute for Biological Studies
13.1K papers, 1.6M citations

94% related

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
30.9K papers, 2.2M citations

93% related

Scripps Research Institute
32.8K papers, 2.9M citations

93% related

Genentech
17.1K papers, 1.4M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202337
2022627
20211,727
20201,534
20191,364
20181,107