Institution
Cancer Epidemiology Unit
About: Cancer Epidemiology Unit is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Cancer. The organization has 669 authors who have published 1725 publications receiving 93979 citations.
Topics: Population, Cancer, Breast cancer, European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, Prospective cohort study
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The number of rare malignant pediatric tumors expected to be diagnosed in Italy with the number of cases actually enrolled in the TREP database in 2000–2006 is compared.
Abstract: Rare malignant pediatric tumors are essentially orphan diseasesand make up a variety of neoplasms with particular biological andclinicalcharacteristics.Someofthesetumorsarerareatanyage,butmost are particularly rare in childhood and adolescence [1].In 2000, a nationwide Italian cooperative project, called theTREP (Tumori Rari in Eta` Pediatrica or Rare Tumours in PediatricAge) project, was launched in Italy under the auspices of theAssociazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP),and in cooperation with the Societa` Italiana Chirurgia Pediatrica(SICP) to improve basic research on these tumors and their clinicalmanagement. The project aimed to establish a network of pediatricand adult oncologists, surgeons, pathologists and biologists, to poolclinical data, and develop diagnostic and therapeutic recommenda-tions for each of these rare tumors [2].As a first step, the TREP group gave an arbitrary but pragmaticdefinition of ‘‘rare pediatric tumors,’’ defining them as solidmalignancies characterized by annual incidence rates of less than2 per million children (0–14 years) and not enrolled in specificclinical trials. The list included: nasopharyngeal carcinoma,adrenocortical tumors, pleuro-pulmonary blastoma (and other lungtumors), carcinoid tumors, cutaneous melanoma, renal carcinoma,pancreatoblastoma (and other pancreatic exocrine tumors), gonadalnon-germ-cell tumors (ovary/testis), pheochromocytoma and para-ganglioma, thyroid carcinoma, salivary gland tumors, breastcarcinoma, carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract, and carcinomaof the thymus [2]. Therefore, the list excluded entities as renalrhabdoid tumors, that are registered in the national Wilms study;hepatoblastomaandmalignantgermcelltumors,thathavetheirownprotocols; rare histotypes of soft part sarcomas, that are covered bythe cooperative study on soft tissue sarcomas, as well as rare bonetumors; and other tumors whose incidence parallels that of rarepediatric tumors butwere already included in clinical trials. Centralnervous system tumors and hematological malignancies wereexcluded from the TREP list.TheTREPgrouphasalreadypublishedareportonitsfirst6yearsof activity. Here, we compare the number of these rare pediatrictumors expected to be diagnosed in Italy (based on incidence datafrom Italian network of well-established population-based cancerregistries [AIRTum]) [3] and the number of patients enrolled in theTREP project between 2000 and 2006, with a view to appraisingthe nationwide diffusion and efficacy of the TREP project. Thestudy analyzed the differences in the patterns of referral of children(0–14 years old) and adolescents less than 18 years (15–17 yearsold) with rare malignant tumors.
56 citations
••
Queensland University of Technology1, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute2, Institute of Cancer Research3, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust4, University of Cambridge5, University of Warwick6, Cancer Council Victoria7, University of Melbourne8, Karolinska Institutet9, University of Southern California10, University of Turku11, University of Tampere12, Copenhagen University Hospital13, Cancer Epidemiology Unit14, University of Washington15, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center16, Mayo Clinic17, University of Ulm18, Washington University in St. Louis19, Brigham and Women's Hospital20, Pomeranian Medical University21, University of Utah22, German Cancer Research Center23, Sofia Medical University24
TL;DR: Findings from this large association study suggest that a focus on miRSNPs, including functional evaluation, can identify candidate risk loci below currently accepted statistical levels of genome-wide significance.
Abstract: Free to read Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy among men worldwide. Genome-wide association studies have identified 100 risk variants for prostate cancer, which can explain approximately 33% of the familial risk of the disease. We hypothesized that a comprehensive analysis of genetic variations found within the 3' untranslated region of genes predicted to affect miRNA binding (miRSNP) can identify additional prostate cancer risk variants. We investigated the association between 2,169 miRSNPs and prostate cancer risk in a large-scale analysis of 22,301 cases and 22,320 controls of European ancestry from 23 participating studies. Twenty-two miRSNPs were associated (P<2.3×10(-5)) with risk of prostate cancer, 10 of which were within 7 genes previously not mapped by GWAS studies. Further, using miRNA mimics and reporter gene assays, we showed that miR-3162-5p has specific affinity for the KLK3 rs1058205 miRSNP T-allele, whereas miR-370 has greater affinity for the VAMP8 rs1010 miRSNP A-allele, validating their functional role. SIGNIFICANCE Findings from this large association study suggest that a focus on miRSNPs, including functional evaluation, can identify candidate risk loci below currently accepted statistical levels of genome-wide significance. Studies of miRNAs and their interactions with SNPs could provide further insights into the mechanisms of prostate cancer risk.
56 citations
••
TL;DR: There was a significant reduction in the incidence of local recurrence inThose who had received early postoperative radiotherapy compared with those who had not, and there was no statistically significant difference in survival or inThe incidence ofLocal recurrence or distant metastases between the two groups.
56 citations
••
University of Cambridge1, Medical Research Council2, Carlos III Health Institute3, Utrecht University4, University of Paris-Sud5, International Agency for Research on Cancer6, Aarhus University7, Institut Gustave Roussy8, Wageningen University and Research Centre9, Lund University10, University of Murcia11, German Cancer Research Center12, Cancer Epidemiology Unit13, University of Granada14, Aalborg University15, Prevention Institute16, University of Naples Federico II17, Umeå University18, University of Turin19, Imperial College London20
TL;DR: A combination of individual fatty acids, characterised by high concentrations of linoleic acid, odd-chain fatty acids; and very long-chain fat acids, was associated with lower incidence of T2D, and the specific fatty acid pattern was influenced by metabolic, genetic, and dietary factors.
Abstract: Background Combinations of multiple fatty acids may influence cardiometabolic risk more than single fatty acids. The association of a combination of fatty acids with incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) ...
56 citations
••
TL;DR: Completeness of identification of IC appears to contribute most to international variation, and cannot be easily controlled for in methodologically rigorous comparisons, and an operational definition of IC is proposed to enhance international comparability.
Abstract: International comparisons of interval cancers (IC) are important to better understand the relationship between programmes' performance and screening practices. In this respect, differences in (i) definition, (ii) identification and (iii) quantification of IC have received little attention. To examine these 3 comparability issues and activities involving IC, an assessment was conducted among member countries of the International Breast Cancer Screening Network, and the impact of accuracy of identification and quantification practices was estimated using 1996-98 data from the Dutch breast cancer screening programme. Information was obtained from 19 screening programmes in 18 countries, 16 of which acknowledged the coexistence of opportunistic screening. IC data were collected to evaluate performance of the screening programme (100% of programmes) and the radiologists (89%); 53% of programmes had a designated review process for IC. Most programmes (84%) agreed with the European Guidelines definition of IC, but a case situation exercise evidenced substantial discrepancy in classification of cancers that occurred after a positive screen. Completeness of identification of IC appears to contribute most to international variation, and cannot be easily controlled for in methodologically rigorous comparisons. Statistically significant differences of about 4% were measured between quantification methods for IC. An operational definition of IC is proposed to enhance international comparability. Valid comparisons of IC are possible with careful attention to the definition but true differences in IC frequency across screening programmes should exceed 10% to be possibly indicative of real differences between programmes.
56 citations
Authors
Showing all 669 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Richard Peto | 183 | 683 | 231434 |
Kay-Tee Khaw | 174 | 1389 | 138782 |
Silvia Franceschi | 155 | 1340 | 112504 |
Timothy J. Key | 146 | 808 | 90810 |
Hans-Olov Adami | 145 | 908 | 83473 |
Alicja Wolk | 135 | 778 | 66239 |
Paolo Vineis | 134 | 1088 | 86608 |
Lars Klareskog | 131 | 697 | 63281 |
Eva Negri | 129 | 1010 | 66735 |
John A. Baron | 128 | 609 | 61182 |
Jack Cuzick | 128 | 754 | 79979 |
Anders Ekbom | 116 | 613 | 51430 |
C. La Vecchia | 115 | 817 | 53460 |
Valerie Beral | 114 | 471 | 53729 |
Carlo La Vecchia | 112 | 1265 | 56282 |