scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Cardiff and Vale University Health Board

HealthcareCardiff, United Kingdom
About: Cardiff and Vale University Health Board is a healthcare organization based out in Cardiff, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Randomized controlled trial. The organization has 1304 authors who have published 1317 publications receiving 28827 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 2014-Gut
TL;DR: A multidisciplinary panel of 18 physicians and 3 non-physicians from eight countries reviewed the literature on diagnosis and management of adult coeliac disease and the recommendations are presented.
Abstract: A multidisciplinary panel of 18 physicians and 3 nonphysicians from eight countries (Sweden, UK, Argentina, Australia, Italy, Finland, Norway and the USA) reviewed the literature on diagnosis and management of adult coeliac disease (CD). This paper presents the recommendations of the British Society of Gastroenterology. Areas of controversies were explored through phone meetings and web surveys. Nine working groups examined the following areas of CD diagnosis and management: classification of CD; genetics and immunology; diagnostics; serology and endoscopy; follow-up; gluten-free diet; refractory CD and malignancies; quality of life; novel treatments; patient support; and screening for CD.

842 citations

Posted ContentDOI
22 Jun 2020-medRxiv
TL;DR: In patients hospitalized with COVID-19, dexamethasone reduced 28-day mortality among those receiving invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen at randomization, but not among patients not receiving respiratory support.
Abstract: Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with diffuse lung damage Corticosteroids may modulate immune-mediated lung injury and reducing progression to respiratory failure and death Methods: The Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 therapy (RECOVERY) trial is a randomized, controlled, open-label, adaptive, platform trial comparing a range of possible treatments with usual care in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 We report the preliminary results for the comparison of dexamethasone 6 mg given once daily for up to ten days vs usual care alone The primary outcome was 28-day mortality Results: 2104 patients randomly allocated to receive dexamethasone were compared with 4321 patients concurrently allocated to usual care Overall, 454 (216%) patients allocated dexamethasone and 1065 (246%) patients allocated usual care died within 28 days (age-adjusted rate ratio [RR] 083; 95% confidence interval [CI] 074 to 092; P<0001) The proportional and absolute mortality rate reductions varied significantly depending on level of respiratory support at randomization (test for trend p<0001): Dexamethasone reduced deaths by one-third in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (290% vs 407%, RR 065 [95% CI 051 to 082]; p<0001), by one-fifth in patients receiving oxygen without invasive mechanical ventilation (215% vs 250%, RR 080 [95% CI 070 to 092]; p=0002), but did not reduce mortality in patients not receiving respiratory support at randomization (170% vs 132%, RR 122 [95% CI 093 to 161]; p=014) Conclusions: In patients hospitalized with COVID-19, dexamethasone reduced 28-day mortality among those receiving invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen at randomization, but not among patients not receiving respiratory support

798 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Alternative resources and strategies are discussed in an attempt to tackle genuine concerns of diminished allotted dissection time and the number of qualified anatomy instructors, which will eventually deteriorate the quality of education.
Abstract: Anatomy has historically been a cornerstone in medical education regardless of nation or specialty. Until recently, dissection and didactic lectures were its sole pedagogy. Teaching methodology has been revolutionized with more reliance on models, imaging, simulation, and the Internet to further consolidate and enhance the learning experience. Moreover, modern medical curricula are giving less importance to anatomy education and to the acknowledged value of dissection. Universities have even abandoned dissection completely in favor of user-friendly multimedia, alternative teaching approaches, and newly defined priorities in clinical practice. Anatomy curriculum is undergoing international reformation but the current framework lacks uniformity among institutions. Optimal learning content can be categorized into the following modalities: (1) dissection/prosection, (2) interactive multimedia, (3) procedural anatomy, (4) surface and clinical anatomy, and (5) imaging. The importance of multimodal teaching, with examples suggested in this article, has been widely recognized and assessed. Nevertheless, there are still ongoing limitations in anatomy teaching. Substantial problems consist of diminished allotted dissection time and the number of qualified anatomy instructors, which will eventually deteriorate the quality of education. Alternative resources and strategies are discussed in an attempt to tackle these genuine concerns. The challenges are to reinstate more effective teaching and learning tools while maintaining the beneficial values of orthodox dissection. The UK has a reputable medical education but its quality could be improved by observing international frameworks. The heavy penalty of not concentrating on sufficient anatomy education will inevitably lead to incompetent anatomists and healthcare professionals, leaving patients to face dire repercussions. Anat Sci Educ 3: 83–93, 2010. © 2010 American Association of Anatomists.

739 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The evidence showed that individual TFCBT and EMDR did better than waitlist/usual care in reducing clinician-assessed PTSD symptoms, and thatindividual T FCBT, EMDR and non-TFCBT were more effective than other therapies.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a distressing condition, which is often treated with psychological therapies. Earlier versions of this review, and other meta-analyses, have found these to be effective, with trauma-focused treatments being more effective than non-trauma-focused treatments. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 and updated in 2007. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of psychological therapies for the treatment of adults with chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). SEARCH METHODS: For this update, we searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group's Specialised Register (CCDANCTR-Studies and CCDANCTR-References) all years to 12th April 2013. This register contains relevant randomised controlled trials from: The Cochrane Library (all years), MEDLINE (1950 to date), EMBASE (1974 to date), and PsycINFO (1967 to date). In addition, we handsearched the Journal of Traumatic Stress, contacted experts in the field, searched bibliographies of included studies, and performed citation searches of identified articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of individual trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TFCBT), eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR), non-trauma-focused CBT (non-TFCBT), other therapies (supportive therapy, non-directive counselling, psychodynamic therapy and present-centred therapy), group TFCBT, or group non-TFCBT, compared to one another or to a waitlist or usual care group for the treatment of chronic PTSD. The primary outcome measure was the severity of clinician-rated traumatic-stress symptoms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data and entered them into Review Manager 5 software. We contacted authors to obtain missing data. Two review authors independently performed 'Risk of bias' assessments. We pooled the data where appropriate, and analysed for summary effects

581 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The data show that NKG2D is a likely physiological target for exosome-mediated immune evasion in cancer, and lymphocyte effector function was impaired by pretreatment with tumor exosomes, as these cells exhibited poor NKG 2D-dependent production of IFN-γ and poor NKg2D- dependent killing function.
Abstract: NKG2D is an activating receptor for NK, NKT, CD8(+), and gammadelta(+) T cells, whose aberrant loss in cancer is a key mechanism of immune evasion. Soluble NKG2D ligands and growth factors, such as TGFbeta1 emanating from tumors, are mechanisms for down-regulating NKG2D expression. Cancers thereby impair the capacity of lymphocytes to recognize and destroy them. In this study, we show that exosomes derived from cancer cells express ligands for NKG2D and express TGFbeta1, and we investigate the impact of such exosomes on CD8(+) T and NK cell NKG2D expression and on NKG2D-dependent functions. Exosomes produced by various cancer cell lines in vitro, or isolated from pleural effusions of mesothelioma patients triggered down-regulation of surface NKG2D expression by NK cells and CD8(+) T cells. This decrease was rapid, sustained, and resulted from direct interactions between exosomes and NK cells or CD8(+) T cells. Other markers (CD4, CD8, CD56, CD16, CD94, or CD69) remained unchanged, indicating the selectivity and nonactivatory nature of the response. Exosomal NKG2D ligands were partially responsible for this effect, as down-modulation of NKG2D was slightly attenuated in the presence of MICA-specific Ab. In contrast, TGFbeta1-neutralizing Ab strongly abrogated NKG2D down-modulation, suggesting exosomally expressed TGFbeta as the principal mechanism. Lymphocyte effector function was impaired by pretreatment with tumor exosomes, as these cells exhibited poor NKG2D-dependent production of IFN-gamma and poor NKG2D-dependent killing function. This hyporesponsiveness was evident even in the presence of IL-15, a strong inducer of NKG2D. Our data show that NKG2D is a likely physiological target for exosome-mediated immune evasion in cancer.

474 citations


Authors

Showing all 1308 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
David R. Williams1782034138789
Vikram Patel11665459717
Malcolm David Mason8537834563
Richard Harding8373127493
David J. Hawkes7858633071
David Edmund Johannes Linden7436118787
Peter W. Halligan7425518605
Peter William Collins7033215470
Ernest Choy6833119304
Stella M. Davies6845522806
Daniel J. Smith6534616708
Justin Kenardy5924912937
William Howard Evans591829269
Judith Rankin5727311193
Victor L. Roggli5628014388
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
St George's, University of London
11.6K papers, 574.1K citations

87% related

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
9.6K papers, 399.3K citations

87% related

Ninewells Hospital
7.1K papers, 273.6K citations

85% related

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
11.6K papers, 381.4K citations

84% related

St Thomas' Hospital
15.5K papers, 624.3K citations

84% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20231
20225
2021189
2020158
2019119
2018101