Institution
Carnegie Mellon University
Education•Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States•
About: Carnegie Mellon University is a education organization based out in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Robot. The organization has 36317 authors who have published 104359 publications receiving 5975734 citations. The organization is also known as: CMU & Carnegie Mellon.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: It is found that the ability of all these solvers to obtain good solutions diminishes with increasing problem size, and TomLAB/MULTIMIN, TOMLAB/GLCCLUSTER, MCS and TOMLab/LGO are better, on average, than other derivative-free solvers in terms of solution quality within 2,500 function evaluations.
Abstract: This paper addresses the solution of bound-constrained optimization problems using algorithms that require only the availability of objective function values but no derivative information. We refer to these algorithms as derivative-free algorithms. Fueled by a growing number of applications in science and engineering, the development of derivative-free optimization algorithms has long been studied, and it has found renewed interest in recent time. Along with many derivative-free algorithms, many software implementations have also appeared. The paper presents a review of derivative-free algorithms, followed by a systematic comparison of 22 related implementations using a test set of 502 problems. The test bed includes convex and nonconvex problems, smooth as well as nonsmooth problems. The algorithms were tested under the same conditions and ranked under several criteria, including their ability to find near-global solutions for nonconvex problems, improve a given starting point, and refine a near-optimal solution. A total of 112,448 problem instances were solved. We find that the ability of all these solvers to obtain good solutions diminishes with increasing problem size. For the problems used in this study, TOMLAB/MULTIMIN, TOMLAB/GLCCLUSTER, MCS and TOMLAB/LGO are better, on average, than other derivative-free solvers in terms of solution quality within 2,500 function evaluations. These global solvers outperform local solvers even for convex problems. Finally, TOMLAB/OQNLP, NEWUOA, and TOMLAB/MULTIMIN show superior performance in terms of refining a near-optimal solution.
1,183 citations
••
08 May 1994TL;DR: A new algorithm, D*, is introduced, capable of planning paths in unknown, partially known, and changing environments in an efficient, optimal, and complete manner.
Abstract: The task of planning trajectories for a mobile robot has received considerable attention in the research literature. Most of the work assumes the robot has a complete and accurate model of its environment before it begins to move; less attention has been paid to the problem of partially known environments. This situation occurs for an exploratory robot or one that must move to a goal location without the benefit of a floorplan or terrain map. Existing approaches plan an initial path based on known information and then modify the plan locally or replan the entire path as the robot discovers obstacles with its sensors, sacrificing optimality or computational efficiency respectively. This paper introduces a new algorithm, D*, capable of planning paths in unknown, partially known, and changing environments in an efficient, optimal, and complete manner. >
1,183 citations
•
[...]
TL;DR: The CMU Multi-PIE database as mentioned in this paper contains 337 subjects, imaged under 15 view points and 19 illumination conditions in up to four recording sessions, with a limited number of subjects, a single recording session and only few expressions captured.
Abstract: A close relationship exists between the advancement of face recognition algorithms and the availability of face databases varying factors that affect facial appearance in a controlled manner. The CMU PIE database has been very influential in advancing research in face recognition across pose and illumination. Despite its success the PIE database has several shortcomings: a limited number of subjects, a single recording session and only few expressions captured. To address these issues we collected the CMU Multi-PIE database. It contains 337 subjects, imaged under 15 view points and 19 illumination conditions in up to four recording sessions. In this paper we introduce the database and describe the recording procedure. We furthermore present results from baseline experiments using PCA and LDA classifiers to highlight similarities and differences between PIE and Multi-PIE.
1,181 citations
Authors
Showing all 36645 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Yi Chen | 217 | 4342 | 293080 |
Rakesh K. Jain | 200 | 1467 | 177727 |
Robert C. Nichol | 187 | 851 | 162994 |
Michael I. Jordan | 176 | 1016 | 216204 |
Jasvinder A. Singh | 176 | 2382 | 223370 |
J. N. Butler | 172 | 2525 | 175561 |
P. Chang | 170 | 2154 | 151783 |
Krzysztof Matyjaszewski | 169 | 1431 | 128585 |
Yang Yang | 164 | 2704 | 144071 |
Geoffrey E. Hinton | 157 | 414 | 409047 |
Herbert A. Simon | 157 | 745 | 194597 |
Yongsun Kim | 156 | 2588 | 145619 |
Terrence J. Sejnowski | 155 | 845 | 117382 |
John B. Goodenough | 151 | 1064 | 113741 |
Scott Shenker | 150 | 454 | 118017 |