scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Carnegie Mellon University

EducationPittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
About: Carnegie Mellon University is a education organization based out in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Robot. The organization has 36317 authors who have published 104359 publications receiving 5975734 citations. The organization is also known as: CMU & Carnegie Mellon.


Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
22 Jun 2005
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the Monte Carlo method for the simulation of grain growth and recrystallization, and present a small subset of the broader use of Monte Carlo methods for which an excellent overview can be found in the book.
Abstract: This chapter is aimed at describing the Monte Carlo method for the simulation of grain growth and recrystallization. It has also been extended to phase transformations and hybrid versions (Monte Carlo coupled with Cellular Automaton) of the model can also accommodate diffusion. If reading this chapter inspires you to program your own version of the algorithm and try to solve some problems, then we will have succeeded! The method is simple to implement and it is fairly straightforward to apply variable material properties such as anisotropic grain boundary energy and mobility. There are, however, some important limitations of the method that must be kept in mind. These limitations include an inherent lattice anisotropy that manifests itself in various ways. For many purposes, however, if you pay attention to what has been found to previous work, the model is robust and highly efficient from a computational perspective. In many circumstances, it is best to use the model to gain insight into a physical system and then obtain a new theoretical understanding, in preference to interpreting the results as being directly representative of a particular material. Please also keep in mind that the “Monte Carlo Method” described herein is a small subset of the broader use of Monte Carlo methods for which an excellent overview can be found in the book by Landau and Binder (2000).

1,115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors use a dynamic model to predict changes in a firm's systematic risk, and its expected return, and show that the model simultaneously reproduces the time-series relation between the book-to-market ratio and asset returns, the cross-sectional relation between book to market, market value, and return, contrarian effects at short horizons, momentum effects at longer horizons and the inverse relation between interest rates and the market risk premium.
Abstract: As a consequence of optimal investment choices, a firm's assets and growth options change in predictable ways. Using a dynamic model, we show that this imparts predictability to changes in a firm's systematic risk, and its expected return. Simulations show that the model simultaneously reproduces: (i) the time-series relation between the book-to-market ratio and asset returns; (ii) the cross-sectional relation between book-to-market, market value, and return; (iii) contrarian effects at short horizons; (iv) momentum effects at longer horizons; and (v) the inverse relation between interest rates and the market risk premium. RECENT EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN FINANCE has focused on regularities in the cross section of expected returns that appear anomalous relative to traditional models. Stock returns are related to book-to-market, and market value.1 Past returns have also been shown to predict relative performance, through the documented success of contrarian and momentum strategies.2 Existing explanations for these results are that they are due to behavioral biases or risk premia for omitted state variables.3 These competing explanations are difficult to evaluate without models that explicitly tie the characteristics of interest to risks and risk premia. For example, with respect to book-to-market, Lakonishok et al. (1994) argue: "The point here is simple: although the returns to the B/M strategy are impressive, B/M is not a 'clean' variable uniquely associated with eco

1,115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a leading depiction of the evolution of new industries, the product life cycle, is used to organize the evidence it is shown that many industries evolve through their formative eras, but regular patterns occur when industries are mature that are not predicted by the product lifecycle.
Abstract: Evidence on entry, exit, firm survival, innovation and firm structure in new industries is reviewed to assess whether industries proceed through regular cycles as they age. A leading depiction of the evolution of new industries, the product life cycle, is used to organize the evidence it is shown that the product life cycle captures the way many industries evolve through their formative eras, but regular patterns occur when industries are mature that are not predicted by the product life cycle. Regularities in entry, exit, firm survival and firm structure are also developed for industries whose evolution departs significantly from the product life cycle. Opportunities for further research on the nature of industry life cycles and the factors that condition which life cycle pattern an industry follows are discussed. Copyright 1997 by Oxford University Press.

1,113 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a general consumption/investment problem is considered for an agent whose actions cannot affect the market prices, and who strives to maximize total expected discounted utility of both consumption and investment.
Abstract: A general consumption/investment problem is considered for an agent whose actions cannot affect the market prices, and who strives to maximize total expected discounted utility of both consumption ...

1,107 citations


Authors

Showing all 36645 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Yi Chen2174342293080
Rakesh K. Jain2001467177727
Robert C. Nichol187851162994
Michael I. Jordan1761016216204
Jasvinder A. Singh1762382223370
J. N. Butler1722525175561
P. Chang1702154151783
Krzysztof Matyjaszewski1691431128585
Yang Yang1642704144071
Geoffrey E. Hinton157414409047
Herbert A. Simon157745194597
Yongsun Kim1562588145619
Terrence J. Sejnowski155845117382
John B. Goodenough1511064113741
Scott Shenker150454118017
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
268K papers, 18.2M citations

95% related

University of Maryland, College Park
155.9K papers, 7.2M citations

93% related

University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

93% related

IBM
253.9K papers, 7.4M citations

93% related

Princeton University
146.7K papers, 9.1M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023120
2022499
20214,980
20205,375
20195,420
20184,972