scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Case Western Reserve University

EducationCleveland, Ohio, United States
About: Case Western Reserve University is a education organization based out in Cleveland, Ohio, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 54617 authors who have published 106568 publications receiving 5071613 citations. The organization is also known as: Case & Case Western.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
D. S. Akerib1, Henrique Araujo2, X. Bai3, A. J. Bailey2, J. Balajthy4, S. Bedikian5, Ethan Bernard5, A. Bernstein6, Alexander Bolozdynya1, A. W. Bradley1, D. Byram7, Sidney Cahn5, M. C. Carmona-Benitez8, C. Chan9, J.J. Chapman9, A. A. Chiller7, C. Chiller7, K. Clark1, T. Coffey1, A. Currie2, A. Curioni5, Steven Dazeley6, L. de Viveiros10, A. Dobi4, J. E. Y. Dobson11, E. M. Dragowsky1, E. Druszkiewicz12, B. N. Edwards5, C. H. Faham13, S. Fiorucci9, C. E. Flores14, R. J. Gaitskell9, V. M. Gehman13, C. Ghag15, K.R. Gibson1, Murdock Gilchriese13, C. R. Hall4, M. Hanhardt3, S. A. Hertel5, M. Horn5, D. Q. Huang9, M. Ihm16, R. G. Jacobsen16, L. Kastens5, K. Kazkaz6, R. Knoche4, S. Kyre8, R. L. Lander14, N. A. Larsen5, C. Lee1, David Leonard4, K. T. Lesko13, A. Lindote10, M.I. Lopes10, A. Lyashenko5, D.C. Malling9, R. L. Mannino17, Daniel McKinsey5, Dongming Mei7, J. Mock14, M. Moongweluwan12, J. A. Morad14, M. Morii18, A. St. J. Murphy11, C. Nehrkorn8, H. N. Nelson8, F. Neves10, James Nikkel5, R. A. Ott14, M. Pangilinan9, P. D. Parker5, E. K. Pease5, K. Pech1, P. Phelps1, L. Reichhart15, T. A. Shutt1, C. Silva10, W. Skulski12, C. Sofka17, V. N. Solovov10, P. Sorensen6, T.M. Stiegler17, K. O'Sullivan5, T. J. Sumner2, Robert Svoboda14, M. Sweany14, Matthew Szydagis14, D. J. Taylor, B. P. Tennyson5, D. R. Tiedt3, Mani Tripathi14, S. Uvarov14, J.R. Verbus9, N. Walsh14, R. C. Webb17, J. T. White17, D. White8, M. S. Witherell8, M. Wlasenko18, F.L.H. Wolfs12, M. Woods14, Chao Zhang7 
TL;DR: The first WIMP search data set is reported, taken during the period from April to August 2013, presenting the analysis of 85.3 live days of data, finding that the LUX data are in disagreement with low-mass W IMP signal interpretations of the results from several recent direct detection experiments.
Abstract: The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment is a dual-phase xenon time-projection chamber operating at the Sanford Underground Research Facility (Lead, South Dakota). The LUX cryostat was filled for the first time in the underground laboratory in February 2013. We report results of the first WIMP search data set, taken during the period from April to August 2013, presenting the analysis of 85.3 live days of data with a fiducial volume of 118 kg. A profile-likelihood analysis technique shows our data to be consistent with the background-only hypothesis, allowing 90% confidence limits to be set on spin-independent WIMP-nucleon elastic scattering with a minimum upper limit on the cross section of 7.6 × 10(-46) cm(2) at a WIMP mass of 33 GeV/c(2). We find that the LUX data are in disagreement with low-mass WIMP signal interpretations of the results from several recent direct detection experiments.

1,962 citations

Book
21 Nov 1994
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a survey of self-regulation failure in social and theoretical contexts, focusing on the following: Self-Regulation Failure: Blowing It. Failure to Control Emotions and Moods.
Abstract: Basic Issues: Introduction: Self-Regulation Failure in Social and Theoretical Context. General Patterns and Mechanisms of Self-Regulation Failure. Controlling Thoughts, Feelings, and Actions: Task Performance and Self-Regulation Failure: Blowing It. Self-Management: Taking Care of Yourself. Thoughts Out of Control. Failure to Control Emotions and Moods. Controlling Impulses and Appetities: Impulses and Appetites. Alcohol Consumption and Abuse. Eating Too Much. Smoking. A Sampler of Other Behavioral Control Problems: Gambling, Shopping, and Aggression. Conclusion: Self Regulation: Propects, Problems, and Promises. References. Subject Index.

1,949 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggest that microsatellite instability in sporadic colorectal cancer often results from epigenetic inactivation of hMLH1 in association with DNA methylation.
Abstract: Inactivation of the genes involved in DNA mismatch repair is associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancer. We report that hypermethylation of the 5′ CpG island of hMLH1 is found in the majority of sporadic primary colorectal cancers with MSI, and that this methylation was often, but not invariably, associated with loss of hMLH1 protein expression. Such methylation also occurred, but was less common, in MSI− tumors, as well as in MSI+ tumors with known mutations of a mismatch repair gene (MMR). No hypermethylation of hMSH2 was found. Hypermethylation of colorectal cancer cell lines with MSI also was frequently observed, and in such cases, reversal of the methylation with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine not only resulted in reexpression of hMLH1 protein, but also in restoration of the MMR capacity in MMR-deficient cell lines. Our results suggest that microsatellite instability in sporadic colorectal cancer often results from epigenetic inactivation of hMLH1 in association with DNA methylation.

1,942 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
07 Jan 2009-JAMA
TL;DR: Selenium or vitamin E, alone or in combination at the doses and formulations used, did not prevent prostate cancer in this population of relatively healthy men.
Abstract: Context Secondary analyses of 2 randomized controlled trials and supportive epidemiologic and preclinical data indicated the potential of selenium and vitamin E for preventing prostate cancer. Objective To determine whether selenium, vitamin E, or both could prevent prostate cancer and other diseases with little or no toxicity in relatively healthy men. Design, Setting, and Participants A randomized, placebo-controlled trial (Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial [SELECT]) of 35 533 men from 427 participating sites in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico randomly assigned to 4 groups (selenium, vitamin E, selenium + vitamin E, and placebo) in a double-blind fashion between August 22, 2001, and June 24, 2004. Baseline eligibility included age 50 years or older (African American men) or 55 years or older (all other men), a serum prostate-specific antigen level of 4 ng/mL or less, and a digital rectal examination not suspicious for prostate cancer. Interventions Oral selenium (200 μg/d from L-selenomethionine) and matched vitamin E placebo, vitamin E (400 IU/d of all rac-α-tocopheryl acetate) and matched selenium placebo, selenium + vitamin E, or placebo + placebo for a planned follow-up of minimum of 7 years and a maximum of 12 years. Main Outcome Measures Prostate cancer and prespecified secondary outcomes, including lung, colorectal, and overall primary cancer. Results As of October 23, 2008, median overall follow-up was 5.46 years (range, 4.17-7.33 years). Hazard ratios (99% confidence intervals [CIs]) for prostate cancer were 1.13 (99% CI, 0.95-1.35; n = 473) for vitamin E, 1.04 (99% CI, 0.87-1.24; n = 432) for selenium, and 1.05 (99% CI, 0.88-1.25; n = 437) for selenium + vitamin E vs 1.00 (n = 416) for placebo. There were no significant differences (all P>.15) in any other prespecified cancer end points. There were statistically nonsignificant increased risks of prostate cancer in the vitamin E group (P = .06) and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the selenium group (relative risk, 1.07; 99% CI, 0.94-1.22; P = .16) but not in the selenium + vitamin E group. Conclusion Selenium or vitamin E, alone or in combination at the doses and formulations used, did not prevent prostate cancer in this population of relatively healthy men. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00006392Published online December 9, 2008 (doi:10.1001/jama.2008.864).

1,942 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the major patterns of self-regulatory failure are reviewed and evidence supports a strength (limited resource) model for self-regulation and suggests that people often acquiesce in losing control.
Abstract: The major patterns of self-regulatory failure are reviewed. Underregulation occurs because of deficient standards, inadequate monitoring, or inadequate strength. Misregulation occurs because of false assumptions or misdirected efforts, especially an unwarranted emphasis on emotion. The evidence supports a strength (limited resource) model of self-regulation and suggests that people often acquiesce in losing control. Loss of control of attention, failure of transcendence, and various lapse-activated causes all contribute to regulatory failure.

1,938 citations


Authors

Showing all 54953 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Robert Langer2812324326306
Bert Vogelstein247757332094
Zhong Lin Wang2452529259003
John Q. Trojanowski2261467213948
Kenneth W. Kinzler215640243944
Peter Libby211932182724
David Baltimore203876162955
Carlo M. Croce1981135189007
Ronald Klein1941305149140
Eric J. Topol1931373151025
Paul M. Thompson1832271146736
Yusuke Nakamura1792076160313
Dennis J. Selkoe177607145825
David L. Kaplan1771944146082
Evan E. Eichler170567150409
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

97% related

Johns Hopkins University
249.2K papers, 14M citations

97% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

96% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

96% related

Harvard University
530.3K papers, 38.1M citations

96% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023142
2022411
20214,337
20204,141
20193,978
20183,663