scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

GovernmentAtlanta, Georgia, United States
About: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is a government organization based out in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Public health. The organization has 58238 authors who have published 82592 publications receiving 4405701 citations. The organization is also known as: CDC & Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this study of the 1995 Chicago heat wave, those at greatest risk of dying from the heat were people with medical illnesses who were socially isolated and did not have access to air conditioning.
Abstract: Background During a record-setting heat wave in Chicago in July 1995, there were at least 700 excess deaths, most of which were classified as heat-related We sought to determine who was at greatest risk for heat-related death Methods We conducted a case–control study in Chicago to identify risk factors associated with heat-related death and death from cardiovascular causes from July 14 through July 17, 1995 Beginning on July 21, we interviewed 339 relatives, neighbors, or friends of those who died and 339 controls matched to the case subjects according to neighborhood and age Results The risk of heat-related death was increased for people with known medical problems who were confined to bed (odds ratio as compared with those who were not confined to bed, 55) or who were unable to care for themselves (odds ratio, 41) Also at increased risk were those who did not leave home each day (odds ratio, 67), who lived alone (odds ratio, 23), or who lived on the top floor of a building (odds ratio, 47) Ha

1,210 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Breast cancer subtype analysis confirms the capacity of cancer registries to adjust national collection standards to produce clinically relevant data based on evolving medical knowledge.
Abstract: Background: The American Cancer Society (ACS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Cancer Institute (NCI), and North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) collaborate annually to produce updated, national cancer statistics. This Annual Report includes a focus on breast cancer incidence by subtype using new, national-level data. Methods: Population-based cancer trends and breast cancer incidence by molecular subtype were calculated. Breast cancer subtypes were classified using tumor biomarkers for hormone receptor (HR) and human growth factor-neu receptor (HER2) expression. Results: Overall cancer incidence decreased for men by 1.8% annually from 2007 to 2011. Rates for women were stable from 1998 to 2011. Within these trends there was racial/ethnic variation, and some sites have increasing rates. Among children, incidence rates continued to increase by 0.8% per year over the past decade while, like adults, mortality declined. Overall mortality has been declining for both men and women since the early 1990’s and for children since the 1970’s. HR+/HER2breast cancers, the subtype with the best prognosis, were the most common for all races/ethnicities with highest rates among non-Hispanic white women, local stage cases, and low poverty areas (92.7, 63.51, and 98.69 per 100 non-Hispanic white women, respectively). HR+/HER2- breast cancer incidence rates were strongly, positively correlated with mammography use, particularly for non-Hispanic white women (Pearson 0.57, two-sided P < .001). Triple-negative breast cancers, the subtype with the worst prognosis, were highest among non-Hispanic black women (27.2 per 100 000 non-Hispanic black women), which is reflected in high rates in southeastern states. Conclusions: Progress continues in reducing the burden of cancer in the United States. There are unique racial/ethnicspecific incidence patterns for breast cancer subtypes; likely because of both biologic and social risk factors, including variation in mammography use. Breast cancer subtype analysis confirms the capacity of cancer registries to adjust national collection standards to produce clinically relevant data based on evolving medical knowledge.

1,208 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Tomi Akinyemiju1, Semaw Ferede Abera2, Semaw Ferede Abera3, Muktar Beshir Ahmed4, Noore Alam5, Noore Alam6, Mulubirhan Assefa Alemayohu7, Christine Allen8, Rajaa Al-Raddadi, Nelson Alvis-Guzman9, Yaw Ampem Amoako10, Al Artaman11, Tadesse Awoke Ayele12, Aleksandra Barac, Isabela M. Benseñor13, Adugnaw Berhane2, Zulfiqar A Bhutta14, Jacqueline Castillo-Rivas, Abdulaal A Chitheer, Jee-Young Choi15, Benjamin C Cowie, Lalit Dandona8, Lalit Dandona16, Rakhi Dandona8, Rakhi Dandona16, Subhojit Dey, Daniel Dicker8, Huyen Do Phuc17, Donatus U. Ekwueme18, Maysaa El Sayed Zaki, Florian Fischer19, Thomas Fürst20, Thomas Fürst21, Thomas Fürst22, Jamie Hancock8, Simon I. Hay8, Peter J. Hotez23, Peter J. Hotez24, Sun Ha Jee25, Amir Kasaeian26, Yousef Khader27, Young-Ho Khang15, G Anil Kumar16, Michael Kutz8, Heidi J. Larson28, Alan D. Lopez29, Alan D. Lopez8, Raimundas Lunevicius30, Raimundas Lunevicius31, Reza Malekzadeh26, Colm McAlinden, Toni Meier32, Walter Mendoza33, Ali H. Mokdad8, Maziar Moradi-Lakeh34, Gabriele Nagel35, Quyen Nguyen17, Grant Nguyen8, Felix Akpojene Ogbo36, George C Patton29, David M. Pereira37, Farshad Pourmalek38, Mostafa Qorbani, Amir Radfar39, Gholamreza Roshandel40, Joshua A. Salomon41, Juan Sanabria42, Juan Sanabria43, Benn Sartorius44, Maheswar Satpathy45, Maheswar Satpathy46, Monika Sawhney42, Sadaf G. Sepanlou26, Katya Anne Shackelford8, Hirbo Shore47, Jiandong Sun48, Desalegn Tadese Mengistu7, Roman Topór-Mądry49, Roman Topór-Mądry50, Bach Xuan Tran51, Bach Xuan Tran52, Kingsley N. Ukwaja, Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov53, Stein Emil Vollset54, Stein Emil Vollset55, Theo Vos8, Tolassa Wakayo4, Elisabete Weiderpass56, Elisabete Weiderpass57, Andrea Werdecker, Naohiro Yonemoto58, Mustafa Z. Younis41, Mustafa Z. Younis59, Chuanhua Yu60, Zoubida Zaidi, Liguo Zhu18, Christopher J L Murray8, Mohsen Naghavi8, Christina Fitzmaurice61, Christina Fitzmaurice8 
University of Alabama at Birmingham1, College of Health Sciences, Bahrain2, University of Hohenheim3, Jimma University4, University of Queensland5, Queensland Government6, Mekelle University7, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation8, University of Cartagena9, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital10, University of Manitoba11, University of Gondar12, University of São Paulo13, Aga Khan University14, New Generation University College15, Public Health Foundation of India16, Duy Tan University17, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention18, Bielefeld University19, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute20, University of Basel21, Imperial College London22, Boston Children's Hospital23, Baylor College of Medicine24, Yonsei University25, Tehran University of Medical Sciences26, Jordan University of Science and Technology27, University of London28, University of Melbourne29, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust30, University of Liverpool31, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg32, United Nations Population Fund33, Iran University of Medical Sciences34, University of Ulm35, University of Sydney36, University of Porto37, University of British Columbia38, A.T. Still University39, Golestan University40, Harvard University41, Marshall University42, Case Western Reserve University43, University of KwaZulu-Natal44, Utkal University45, AIIMS, New Delhi46, Haramaya University47, Queensland University of Technology48, Wrocław Medical University49, Jagiellonian University Medical College50, Johns Hopkins University51, Hanoi Medical University52, National Research University – Higher School of Economics53, University of Bergen54, Norwegian Institute of Public Health55, University of Tromsø56, Karolinska Institutet57, Kyoto University58, Jackson State University59, Wuhan University60, University of Washington61
TL;DR: In this article, the authors report results of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2015 study on primary liver cancer incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 195 countries or territories from 1990 to 2015, and present global, regional, and national estimates on the burden of liver cancer attributable to hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and alcohol, and an “other” group that encompasses residual causes.
Abstract: Importance Liver cancer is among the leading causes of cancer deaths globally. The most common causes for liver cancer include hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and alcohol use. Objective To report results of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2015 study on primary liver cancer incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 195 countries or territories from 1990 to 2015, and present global, regional, and national estimates on the burden of liver cancer attributable to HBV, HCV, alcohol, and an “other” group that encompasses residual causes. Design, Settings, and Participants Mortality was estimated using vital registration and cancer registry data in an ensemble modeling approach. Single-cause mortality estimates were adjusted for all-cause mortality. Incidence was derived from mortality estimates and the mortality-to-incidence ratio. Through a systematic literature review, data on the proportions of liver cancer due to HBV, HCV, alcohol, and other causes were identified. Years of life lost were calculated by multiplying each death by a standard life expectancy. Prevalence was estimated using mortality-to-incidence ratio as surrogate for survival. Total prevalence was divided into 4 sequelae that were multiplied by disability weights to derive years lived with disability (YLDs). DALYs were the sum of years of life lost and YLDs. Main Outcomes and Measures Liver cancer mortality, incidence, YLDs, years of life lost, DALYs by etiology, age, sex, country, and year. Results There were 854 000 incident cases of liver cancer and 810 000 deaths globally in 2015, contributing to 20 578 000 DALYs. Cases of incident liver cancer increased by 75% between 1990 and 2015, of which 47% can be explained by changing population age structures, 35% by population growth, and −8% to changing age-specific incidence rates. The male-to-female ratio for age-standardized liver cancer mortality was 2.8. Globally, HBV accounted for 265 000 liver cancer deaths (33%), alcohol for 245 000 (30%), HCV for 167 000 (21%), and other causes for 133 000 (16%) deaths, with substantial variation between countries in the underlying etiologies. Conclusions and Relevance Liver cancer is among the leading causes of cancer deaths in many countries. Causes of liver cancer differ widely among populations. Our results show that most cases of liver cancer can be prevented through vaccination, antiviral treatment, safe blood transfusion and injection practices, as well as interventions to reduce excessive alcohol use. In line with the Sustainable Development Goals, the identification and elimination of risk factors for liver cancer will be required to achieve a sustained reduction in liver cancer burden. The GBD study can be used to guide these prevention efforts.

1,208 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
07 Oct 2005-Science
TL;DR: Reverse genetics was used to generate an influenza virus bearing all eight gene segments of the pandemic virus to study the properties associated with its extraordinary virulence, and confirmed that the coordinated expression of the 1918 virus genes most certainly confers the unique high-virulence phenotype observed with this pandemicirus.
Abstract: The pandemic influenza virus of 1918-1919 killed an estimated 20 to 50 million people worldwide. With the recent availability of the complete 1918 influenza virus coding sequence, we used reverse genetics to generate an influenza virus bearing all eight gene segments of the pandemic virus to study the properties associated with its extraordinary virulence. In stark contrast to contemporary human influenza H1N1 viruses, the 1918 pandemic virus had the ability to replicate in the absence of trypsin, caused death in mice and embryonated chicken eggs, and displayed a high-growth phenotype in human bronchial epithelial cells. Moreover, the coordinated expression of the 1918 virus genes most certainly confers the unique high-virulence phenotype observed with this pandemic virus.

1,202 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
26 Mar 1997-JAMA
TL;DR: Iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia are still relatively common in toddlers, adolescent girls, and women of childbearing age and were more likely in those who are minority, low income, and multiparous.
Abstract: Objective. —To determine the prevalence of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia in the US population. Design. —Nationally representative cross-sectional health examination survey that included venous blood measurements of iron status. Main Outcome Measures. —lron deficiency, defined as having an abnormal value for at least 2 of 3 laboratory tests of iron status (erythrocyte protoporphyrin, transferrin saturation, or serum ferritin); and iron deficiency anemia, defined as iron deficiency plus low hemoglobin. Participants. —A total of 24 894 persons aged 1 year and older examined in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994). Results. —Nine percent of toddlers aged 1 to 2 years and 9% to 11% of adolescent girls and women of childbearing age were iron deficient; of these, iron deficiency anemia was found in 3% and 2% to 5%, respectively. These prevalences correspond to approximately 700000 toddlers and 7.8 million women with iron deficiency; of these, approximately 240 000 toddlers and 3.3 million women have iron deficiency anemia. Iron deficiency occurred in no more than 7% of older children or those older than 50 years, and in no more than 1% of teenage boys and young men. Among women of childbearing age, iron deficiency was more likely in those who are minority, low income, and multiparous. Conclusion. —lron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia are still relatively common in toddlers, adolescent girls, and women of childbearing age.

1,200 citations


Authors

Showing all 58382 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Graham A. Colditz2611542256034
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Bernard Rosner1901162147661
Richard Peto183683231434
Aaron R. Folsom1811118134044
Didier Raoult1733267153016
James F. Sallis169825144836
David R. Jacobs1651262113892
Steven N. Blair165879132929
Gordon J. Freeman164579105193
Dennis R. Burton16468390959
Rory Collins162489193407
Ali H. Mokdad156634160599
Caroline S. Fox155599138951
Paul Elliott153773103839
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Maryland, Baltimore
64.7K papers, 2.9M citations

90% related

Emory University
122.4K papers, 6M citations

89% related

University of Alabama at Birmingham
86.7K papers, 3.9M citations

89% related

University of Colorado Denver
57.2K papers, 2.5M citations

89% related

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
185.3K papers, 9.9M citations

88% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202327
2022254
20215,505
20205,426
20194,527
20184,344