Institution
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute
Facility•Moscow, Russia•
About: Central Economics and Mathematics Institute is a facility organization based out in Moscow, Russia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Foreign-exchange reserves. The organization has 297 authors who have published 580 publications receiving 6449 citations. The organization is also known as: Federal State Institution of Science Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The accelerated adoption of a draft law underpinning the reorganization of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) and the disregard for the demands of the scientific community to perform an expert analysis of the draft law, organize a broad public debate and introduce significant amendments to the text have spurred the debate about the possible causes of such a tough, if not aggressive, attitude of Russian authorities to the Academy in particular and to research in general.
Abstract: The accelerated adoption of a draft law underpinning the reorganization of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) and the disregard for the demands of the scientific community to perform an expert analysis of the draft law, organize a broad public debate, and introduce significant amendments to the text have spurred the debate about the possible causes of such a tough, if not aggressive, attitude of the Russian authorities to the Academy in particular and to research in general. Personal ambitions and a new stage of wealth redistribution, as well as the reluctance of the state to maintain such a large scientific structure, have been cited among the possible causes of such an attitude. The author of this paper attempts to look beyond these issues. Specifically, he perceives the RAS reform as part of the establishment and development of peripheral capitalism in Russian society.
1 citations
••
30 Dec 2017TL;DR: A scientometric analysis of the development of the carbon nanotechnology (NT) direction for 2000–2015 with the participation of 30 most active countries shows shifting the world research center to the Asian region, both on volume and quality indicators.
Abstract: The article presents a scientometric analysis of the development of the carbon nanotechnology (NT) direction for 2000–2015 with the participation of 30 most active countries. It shows shifting the world research center to the Asian region, both on volume and quality indicators. Using the concept of a national research portfolio gives deep characteristics of different countries behavior in the course of scientific rivalry. Due to the strong skewness of the citation distributions, preference is given to the percentile-based indicators, such as: the contribution of a country to the world top-10% (top-1%) of the most highly cited publications, the share of such publications in the country's total output, the highly cited papers index, etc. Relying on them, the author fully discloses the scientific «offensive» of the «newcomer» countries on the «incumbents» ones (e.g. China on the USA, South Korea on Germany, Iran on Russia), the phenomenon of Singapore as an effective producer of highly cited publications on the carbon nanostructures, and international co-authorship in the top-1% segment of the most cited articles. Russia's positions are studied in detail, the main domestic research participants are established, and based on bibliometric criteria the center of scientific excellence in the field of graphene is identified. The paper characterizes the supporting role of a number of national science foundations in the NT carbon direction development using data of WoS. The author used the Science Citation Index Expanded database for the initial bibliographic sampling; information of science foundations of Russia and the USA, as well as patent organizations of Russia (Rospatent) and the world (WIPO) for additional comparison.
1 citations
••
01 Jan 1992TL;DR: The conception is based on logical analysis of the typology concept in general, and corresponding clustering models (hard clusters, fuzzy clusters, and ideal types) are selected.
Abstract: The conception is based on logical analysis of the typology concept in general. The three main models of typologies are revealed, and corresponding clustering models (hard clusters, fuzzy clusters, and ideal types) are selected. Unlike the other available packages our package CLASSMASTER requires that the user chooses parameters of the cluster model, and not the various technical procedures themselves.
1 citations
••
01 Jan 19861 citations
••
19 Sep 2019TL;DR: In this paper, the authors assess the current state of Russian technology platforms and Eurasian technology platforms in the context of their effects on the development of the neo-industrialization processes in the EAEU economies.
Abstract: Purpose: Assessment of the current state of the Russian technology platforms (RTPs) and Eurasian technology platforms (EATPs) in the context of their effects on the development of the neo-industrialization processes in the EAEU economies.
1 citations
Authors
Showing all 315 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Boris Mirkin | 35 | 178 | 6722 |
Yuri Kabanov | 26 | 85 | 3396 |
L. V. Chernysheva | 24 | 167 | 1867 |
Igor V. Evstigneev | 21 | 129 | 1838 |
Alexander Zeifman | 21 | 177 | 1502 |
Vladimir Popov | 20 | 169 | 2041 |
Vyacheslav V. Kalashnikov | 19 | 109 | 1217 |
Vladimir I. Danilov | 18 | 165 | 1255 |
Victor Polterovich | 17 | 126 | 1145 |
Ernst Presman | 15 | 41 | 875 |
Andrei Dmitruk | 13 | 51 | 604 |
Anatoly Peresetsky | 13 | 45 | 617 |
Anton Oleinik | 12 | 55 | 495 |
Vladimir Rotar | 11 | 28 | 577 |
Nikolai B. Melnikov | 11 | 72 | 323 |