Institution
Central University of Tamil Nadu
Education•Thiruvarur, India•
About: Central University of Tamil Nadu is a education organization based out in Thiruvarur, India. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Thin film. The organization has 438 authors who have published 786 publications receiving 13205 citations.
Topics: Population, Thin film, Chemistry, Medicine, Futures contract
Papers
More filters
••
Gregory A. Roth1, Gregory A. Roth2, Degu Abate3, Kalkidan Hassen Abate4 +1025 more•Institutions (333)
TL;DR: Non-communicable diseases comprised the greatest fraction of deaths, contributing to 73·4% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 72·5–74·1) of total deaths in 2017, while communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional causes accounted for 18·6% (17·9–19·6), and injuries 8·0% (7·7–8·2).
5,211 citations
••
Jeffrey D. Stanaway1, Ashkan Afshin1, Emmanuela Gakidou1, Stephen S Lim1 +1050 more•Institutions (346)
TL;DR: This study estimated levels and trends in exposure, attributable deaths, and attributable disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) by age group, sex, year, and location for 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or groups of risks from 1990 to 2017 and explored the relationship between development and risk exposure.
2,910 citations
••
Daniel J. Klionsky1, Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz2, Sara Abdelfatah3, Mahmoud Abdellatif4 +2980 more•Institutions (777)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.
1,129 citations
••
TL;DR: The present work aims to review the progress of recent research on the isolation, identification and diversity of metal resistant endophytic bacteria and illustrate various mechanisms responsible for plant growth promotion and heavy metal detoxification/phytoaccumulation/translocation in plants.
457 citations
••
TL;DR: A global attainment analysis of the feasibility of attaining SDG targets on the basis of past trends and a estimates of health-related SDG index values in countries assessed at the subnational level varied substantially, particularly in China and India, although scores in Japan and the UK were more homogeneous.
312 citations
Authors
Showing all 468 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Sekar Kathiresan | 141 | 479 | 98784 |
Qingzhen Huang | 62 | 405 | 17449 |
Srinivasan Sampath | 51 | 222 | 9494 |
Mallayan Palaniandavar | 47 | 155 | 7705 |
Aditya P Dash | 46 | 232 | 13410 |
Ponniah Ravindran | 44 | 202 | 7631 |
J. Rajesh Banu | 44 | 221 | 5800 |
L. Kavitha | 33 | 129 | 2897 |
Esaki M. Shankar | 31 | 141 | 2790 |
Mani Rajkumar | 31 | 35 | 5897 |
Ram Rajasekharan | 24 | 91 | 2128 |
Andrea Sanson | 23 | 91 | 1645 |
Sasanka Dalapati | 22 | 46 | 3004 |
Meganathan Kannan | 21 | 74 | 1083 |
Siva Sundara Kumar Durairajan | 19 | 53 | 1545 |