scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Charité

HealthcareBerlin, Germany
About: Charité is a healthcare organization based out in Berlin, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 30624 authors who have published 64507 publications receiving 2437322 citations. The organization is also known as: Charite & Charité – University Medicine Berlin.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Shona Hendry1, Roberto Salgado2, Thomas Gevaert3, Prudence A. Russell1, Prudence A. Russell4, Thomas John5, Thomas John1, Bibhusal Thapa1, Michael Christie6, Koen Van de Vijver7, Monica V. Estrada8, Paula I. Gonzalez-Ericsson9, Melinda E. Sanders, Benjamin sss Solomon10, Cinzia Solinas, Gert Van den Eynden, Yves Allory11, Yves Allory12, Matthias Preusser, Johannes A. Hainfellner13, Giancarlo Pruneri, Andrea Vingiani, Sandra Demaria14, Fraser Symmans15, Paolo Nuciforo, Laura Comerma, E. A. Thompson16, Sunil R. Lakhani17, Sunil R. Lakhani18, Seong-Rim Kim, Stuart J. Schnitt19, Cecile Colpaert, Christos Sotiriou2, Stefan J. Scherer20, Michail Ignatiadis2, Sunil Badve21, Robert H. Pierce22, Giuseppe Viale23, Nicolas Sirtaine2, Frédérique Penault-Llorca24, Tomohagu Sugie25, Susan Fineberg26, Soonmyung Paik27, Ashok Srinivasan, Andrea L. Richardson19, Yihong Wang28, Yihong Wang29, Ewa Chmielik30, Jane E. Brock19, Douglas B. Johnson9, Justin M. Balko9, Stephan Wienert31, Veerle Bossuyt32, Stefan Michiels, Nils Ternès, Nicole Burchardi, Stephen J Luen1, Stephen J Luen10, Peter Savas1, Peter Savas10, Frederick Klauschen31, Peter H. Watson33, Brad H. Nelson34, Carmen Criscitiello, Sandra A O'Toole35, Denis Larsimont2, Roland de Wind2, Giuseppe Curigliano, Fabrice Andre36, Magali Lacroix-Triki36, Mark van de Vijver7, Federico Rojo37, Giuseppe Floris3, Shahinaz Bedri14, Joseph A. Sparano26, David L. Rimm32, Torsten O. Nielsen33, Zuzana Kos38, Stephen M. Hewitt39, Baljit Singh40, Gelareh Farshid41, Sibylle Loibl, Kimberly H. Allison42, Nadine Tung19, Sylvia Adams40, Karen Willard-Gallo, Hugo M. Horlings, Leena Gandhi40, Leena Gandhi19, Andre L. Moreira40, Fred R. Hirsch43, Maria Vittoria Dieci44, Maria Urbanowicz45, Iva Brcic46, Konstanty Korski47, Fabien Gaire47, Hartmut Koeppen48, Amy C. Y. Lo48, Amy C. Y. Lo42, Jennifer M. Giltnane48, Marlon Rebelatto49, Keith Steele49, Jiping Zha49, Kenneth Emancipator50, Jonathan Juco50, Carsten Denkert31, Jorge S. Reis-Filho51, Sherene Loi10, Stephen B. Fox1 
TL;DR: In this paper, a standardized methodology to assess tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in solid tumors on hematoxylin and eosin sections, in both primary and metastatic settings, was proposed.
Abstract: Assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in histopathologic specimens can provide important prognostic information in diverse solid tumor types, and may also be of value in predicting response to treatments. However, implementation as a routine clinical biomarker has not yet been achieved. As successful use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and other forms of immunotherapy become a clinical reality, the need for widely applicable, accessible, and reliable immunooncology biomarkers is clear. In part 1 of this review we briefly discuss the host immune response to tumors and different approaches to TIL assessment. We propose a standardized methodology to assess TILs in solid tumors on hematoxylin and eosin sections, in both primary and metastatic settings, based on the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines for TIL assessment in invasive breast carcinoma. A review of the literature regarding the value of TIL assessment in different solid tumor types follows in part 2. The method we propose is reproducible, affordable, easily applied, and has demonstrated prognostic and predictive significance in invasive breast carcinoma. This standardized methodology may be used as a reference against which other methods are compared, and should be evaluated for clinical validity and utility. Standardization of TIL assessment will help to improve consistency and reproducibility in this field, enrich both the quality and quantity of comparable evidence, and help to thoroughly evaluate the utility of TILs assessment in this era of immunotherapy.

415 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Vera Regitz-Zagrosek1
TL;DR: To discuss and address properly the differences in health and health care between men and women, it is necessary to distinguish between sex and gender and their respective effects on health.
Abstract: Men and women are alike in many ways. However, there are important biological and behavioural differences between the two genders. They affect manifestation, epidemiology and pathophysiology of many widespread diseases and the approach to health care. Despite our knowledge of these crucial differences, there is little gender‐specific health care; the prevention, management and therapeutic treatment of many common diseases does not reflect the most obvious and most important risk factors for the patient: sex and gender. This omission is holding back more efficient health care, as gender‐based prevention measures or therapies are probably more effective than the usual ‘one‐size‐fits all’ approach and would benefit patients of both genders. Addressing gender in health and health care therefore requires new approaches at many levels, from training medical personal to clinical medicine, epidemiology and drug development. > …the prevention, management and therapeutic treatment of many common diseases does not reflect the most obvious and most important risk factors for the patient: sex and gender To discuss and address properly the differences in health and health care between men and women, it is necessary to distinguish between sex and gender and their respective effects on health. Sex differences are based on biological factors. These include reproductive function, concentrations of sexual hormones, the expression of genes on X and Y chromosomes and their effects and the higher percentage of body fat in women. By contrast, gender is associated with behaviour, lifestyle and life experience. It determines access to health care, use of the health care system and the behavioural attitudes of medical personnel. Typical gender differences in health care include differences in the use of preventive measures, the prescription of drugs, health insurance reimbursement and referral for or acceptance of particular surgical therapies such as pacemaker implantation or heart transplantation. > Gender medicine must consider the needs …

415 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is proposed that sFlt-1, PIGF, and sFelt-1/PIGF ratio may be of value in the prediction of PE and in the differential diagnosis of patients with atypical presentations of PE, and perhaps in the differentiation diagnosis of women with chronic hypertension suspected to develop superimposed PE.

415 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
05 Jan 2006-Neuron
TL;DR: The release of AEA in injured CNS tissue might represent a new mechanism of neuro-immune communication during CNS injury, which controls and limits immune response after primary CNS damage.

415 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is a need for a more detailed understanding of sex differences and their underlying mechanisms, which holds the potential to design new drugs that target sex-specific cardiovascular mechanisms and affect phenotypes.
Abstract: Major differences between men and women exist in epidemiology, manifestation, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), such as coronary artery disease, pressure overload, hypertension, cardiomyopathy, and heart failure. Corresponding sex differences have been studied in a number of animal models, and mechanistic investigations have been undertaken to analyze the observed sex differences. We summarize the biological mechanisms of sex differences in CVD focusing on three main areas, i.e., genetic mechanisms, epigenetic mechanisms, as well as sex hormones and their receptors. We discuss relevant subtypes of sex hormone receptors, as well as genomic and nongenomic, activational and organizational effects of sex hormones. We describe the interaction of sex hormones with intracellular signaling relevant for cardiovascular cells and the cardiovascular system. Sex, sex hormones, and their receptors may affect a number of cellular processes by their synergistic action on multiple targets. We discuss in detail sex differences in organelle function and in biological processes. We conclude that there is a need for a more detailed understanding of sex differences and their underlying mechanisms, which holds the potential to design new drugs that target sex-specific cardiovascular mechanisms and affect phenotypes. The comparison of both sexes may lead to the identification of protective or maladaptive mechanisms in one sex that could serve as a novel therapeutic target in one sex or in both.

414 citations


Authors

Showing all 30787 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
JoAnn E. Manson2701819258509
Yi Chen2174342293080
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Raymond J. Dolan196919138540
John P. A. Ioannidis1851311193612
Stefan Schreiber1781233138528
Kenneth C. Anderson1781138126072
Eric J. Nestler178748116947
Klaus Rajewsky15450488793
Charles B. Nemeroff14997990426
Andreas Pfeiffer1491756131080
Rinaldo Bellomo1471714120052
Jean Bousquet145128896769
Christopher Hill1441562128098
Holger J. Schünemann141810113169
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
161.5K papers, 5.7M citations

93% related

Heidelberg University
119.1K papers, 4.6M citations

92% related

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
79.2K papers, 4.7M citations

92% related

Brigham and Women's Hospital
110.5K papers, 6.8M citations

92% related

Mayo Clinic
169.5K papers, 8.1M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202339
2022317
20214,866
20204,577
20194,042
20183,718