Institution
Charité
Healthcare•Berlin, Germany•
About: Charité is a healthcare organization based out in Berlin, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 30624 authors who have published 64507 publications receiving 2437322 citations. The organization is also known as: Charite & Charité – University Medicine Berlin.
Topics: Population, Transplantation, Medicine, Cancer, Immune system
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Melbourne1, Université libre de Bruxelles2, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven3, St. Vincent's Health System4, La Trobe University5, Royal Melbourne Hospital6, Netherlands Cancer Institute7, University of California, San Diego8, Vanderbilt University9, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre10, University of Paris11, French Institute of Health and Medical Research12, Medical University of Vienna13, Cornell University14, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center15, Mayo Clinic16, University of Queensland17, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital18, Harvard University19, Novartis20, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis21, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center22, University of Milan23, University of Auvergne24, Kansai Medical University25, Yeshiva University26, Yonsei University27, Rhode Island Hospital28, Brown University29, Curie Institute30, Charité31, Yale University32, University of British Columbia33, University of Victoria34, Garvan Institute of Medical Research35, Université Paris-Saclay36, Autonomous University of Madrid37, University of Ottawa38, National Institutes of Health39, New York University40, University of Adelaide41, Stanford University42, Anschutz Medical Campus43, University of Padua44, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer45, Medical University of Graz46, Hoffmann-La Roche47, Genentech48, MedImmune49, Merck & Co.50, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center51
TL;DR: In this paper, a standardized methodology to assess tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in solid tumors on hematoxylin and eosin sections, in both primary and metastatic settings, was proposed.
Abstract: Assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in histopathologic specimens can provide important prognostic information in diverse solid tumor types, and may also be of value in predicting response to treatments. However, implementation as a routine clinical biomarker has not yet been achieved. As successful use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and other forms of immunotherapy become a clinical reality, the need for widely applicable, accessible, and reliable immunooncology biomarkers is clear. In part 1 of this review we briefly discuss the host immune response to tumors and different approaches to TIL assessment. We propose a standardized methodology to assess TILs in solid tumors on hematoxylin and eosin sections, in both primary and metastatic settings, based on the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines for TIL assessment in invasive breast carcinoma. A review of the literature regarding the value of TIL assessment in different solid tumor types follows in part 2. The method we propose is reproducible, affordable, easily applied, and has demonstrated prognostic and predictive significance in invasive breast carcinoma. This standardized methodology may be used as a reference against which other methods are compared, and should be evaluated for clinical validity and utility. Standardization of TIL assessment will help to improve consistency and reproducibility in this field, enrich both the quality and quantity of comparable evidence, and help to thoroughly evaluate the utility of TILs assessment in this era of immunotherapy.
415 citations
••
TL;DR: To discuss and address properly the differences in health and health care between men and women, it is necessary to distinguish between sex and gender and their respective effects on health.
Abstract: Men and women are alike in many ways. However, there are important biological and behavioural differences between the two genders. They affect manifestation, epidemiology and pathophysiology of many widespread diseases and the approach to health care. Despite our knowledge of these crucial differences, there is little gender‐specific health care; the prevention, management and therapeutic treatment of many common diseases does not reflect the most obvious and most important risk factors for the patient: sex and gender. This omission is holding back more efficient health care, as gender‐based prevention measures or therapies are probably more effective than the usual ‘one‐size‐fits all’ approach and would benefit patients of both genders. Addressing gender in health and health care therefore requires new approaches at many levels, from training medical personal to clinical medicine, epidemiology and drug development.
> …the prevention, management and therapeutic treatment of many common diseases does not reflect the most obvious and most important risk factors for the patient: sex and gender
To discuss and address properly the differences in health and health care between men and women, it is necessary to distinguish between sex and gender and their respective effects on health. Sex differences are based on biological factors. These include reproductive function, concentrations of sexual hormones, the expression of genes on X and Y chromosomes and their effects and the higher percentage of body fat in women. By contrast, gender is associated with behaviour, lifestyle and life experience. It determines access to health care, use of the health care system and the behavioural attitudes of medical personnel. Typical gender differences in health care include differences in the use of preventive measures, the prescription of drugs, health insurance reimbursement and referral for or acceptance of particular surgical therapies such as pacemaker implantation or heart transplantation.
> Gender medicine must consider the needs …
415 citations
••
TL;DR: It is proposed that sFlt-1, PIGF, and sFelt-1/PIGF ratio may be of value in the prediction of PE and in the differential diagnosis of patients with atypical presentations of PE, and perhaps in the differentiation diagnosis of women with chronic hypertension suspected to develop superimposed PE.
415 citations
••
TL;DR: The release of AEA in injured CNS tissue might represent a new mechanism of neuro-immune communication during CNS injury, which controls and limits immune response after primary CNS damage.
415 citations
••
TL;DR: There is a need for a more detailed understanding of sex differences and their underlying mechanisms, which holds the potential to design new drugs that target sex-specific cardiovascular mechanisms and affect phenotypes.
Abstract: Major differences between men and women exist in epidemiology, manifestation, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), such as coronary artery disease, pressure overload, hypertension, cardiomyopathy, and heart failure. Corresponding sex differences have been studied in a number of animal models, and mechanistic investigations have been undertaken to analyze the observed sex differences. We summarize the biological mechanisms of sex differences in CVD focusing on three main areas, i.e., genetic mechanisms, epigenetic mechanisms, as well as sex hormones and their receptors. We discuss relevant subtypes of sex hormone receptors, as well as genomic and nongenomic, activational and organizational effects of sex hormones. We describe the interaction of sex hormones with intracellular signaling relevant for cardiovascular cells and the cardiovascular system. Sex, sex hormones, and their receptors may affect a number of cellular processes by their synergistic action on multiple targets. We discuss in detail sex differences in organelle function and in biological processes. We conclude that there is a need for a more detailed understanding of sex differences and their underlying mechanisms, which holds the potential to design new drugs that target sex-specific cardiovascular mechanisms and affect phenotypes. The comparison of both sexes may lead to the identification of protective or maladaptive mechanisms in one sex that could serve as a novel therapeutic target in one sex or in both.
414 citations
Authors
Showing all 30787 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
JoAnn E. Manson | 270 | 1819 | 258509 |
Yi Chen | 217 | 4342 | 293080 |
David J. Hunter | 213 | 1836 | 207050 |
Raymond J. Dolan | 196 | 919 | 138540 |
John P. A. Ioannidis | 185 | 1311 | 193612 |
Stefan Schreiber | 178 | 1233 | 138528 |
Kenneth C. Anderson | 178 | 1138 | 126072 |
Eric J. Nestler | 178 | 748 | 116947 |
Klaus Rajewsky | 154 | 504 | 88793 |
Charles B. Nemeroff | 149 | 979 | 90426 |
Andreas Pfeiffer | 149 | 1756 | 131080 |
Rinaldo Bellomo | 147 | 1714 | 120052 |
Jean Bousquet | 145 | 1288 | 96769 |
Christopher Hill | 144 | 1562 | 128098 |
Holger J. Schünemann | 141 | 810 | 113169 |