scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Clemson University

EducationClemson, South Carolina, United States
About: Clemson University is a education organization based out in Clemson, South Carolina, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Control theory. The organization has 20556 authors who have published 42518 publications receiving 1170779 citations. The organization is also known as: Clemson Agricultural College of South Carolina.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The need to design interventions to enable consumers to critically assimilate the information posted on YouTube with more authoritative information sources to make effective healthcare decisions is recognized.
Abstract: This article reviews the peer-reviewed literature addressing the healthcare information available on YouTube. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined, and the online databases PubMed and Web of Knowledge were searched using the search phrases: (1) YouTube* AND Health* and (2) YouTube* AND Healthcare*. In all, 18 articles were reviewed, with the results suggesting that (1) YouTube is increasingly being used as a platform for disseminating health information; (2) content and frame analysis were the primary techniques employed by researchers to analyze the characteristics of this information; (3) YouTube contains misleading information, primarily anecdotal, that contradicts the reference standards and the probability of a lay user finding such content is relatively high; (4) the retrieval of relevant videos is dependent on the search term used; and (5) videos from government organizations and professional associations contained trustworthy and high-quality information. YouTube is used as a medium for promoting unscientific therapies and drugs that are yet to be approved by the appropriate agencies and has the potential to change the beliefs of patients concerning controversial topics such as vaccinations. This review recognizes the need to design interventions to enable consumers to critically assimilate the information posted on YouTube with more authoritative information sources to make effective healthcare decisions.

650 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Using a Taylor-series expansion, this article solved a simple reduced-form gravity equation revealing a transparent theoretical relationship among bilateral trade flows, incomes, and trade costs, based upon the model in Anderson and van Wincoop.

648 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the role of institutional, social, and political factors in influencing the extent to which complex information technologies are actually assimilated into organizational practice, and the empirical evidence sheds light on the role that institutional forces that influence the rate of assimilation of the technology.
Abstract: The ability to integrate dispersed pockets of expertise and institute an organizational repository of knowledge is considered to be vital for sustained effectiveness in contemporary business environments. Information technologies provide cost-effective functionalities for building knowledge platforms through systematic acquisition, storage, and dissemination of organizational knowledge. However, in order to gain the value-adding potential of organizational knowledge, it is not sufficient to simply adopt and deploy IT-enabled knowledge platforms. These platforms must be assimilated into the ongoing work processes in organizations. Yet, theories of technology innovation and use suggest that a variety of institutional, social, and political factors blend together in influencing the extent to which complex information technologies are actually assimilated into organizational practice. Therefore, this research addresses a significant question: What forces influence the assimilation of knowledge platforms in organization? Given the significant gap between the adoption and actual assimilation of complex technologies into organizations, this is an important question. Empirical evidence is generated by examining the forces influencing the assimilation of CASE technologies in systems development projects in organizations. CASE is considered to be one of the most mature knowledge platforms in contemporary organizations. The empirical evidence sheds light on the role of institutional forces that influence the rate of assimilation of the technology. The findings have significant implications for further research and practice.

647 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Arang Rhie1, Shane A. McCarthy2, Shane A. McCarthy3, Olivier Fedrigo4, Joana Damas5, Giulio Formenti4, Sergey Koren1, Marcela Uliano-Silva6, William Chow2, Arkarachai Fungtammasan, J. H. Kim7, Chul Hee Lee7, Byung June Ko7, Mark Chaisson8, Gregory Gedman4, Lindsey J. Cantin4, Françoise Thibaud-Nissen1, Leanne Haggerty9, Iliana Bista2, Iliana Bista3, Michelle Smith2, Bettina Haase4, Jacquelyn Mountcastle4, Sylke Winkler10, Sylke Winkler11, Sadye Paez4, Jason T. Howard, Sonja C. Vernes12, Sonja C. Vernes11, Sonja C. Vernes13, Tanya M. Lama14, Frank Grützner15, Wesley C. Warren16, Christopher N. Balakrishnan17, Dave W Burt18, Jimin George19, Matthew T. Biegler4, David Iorns, Andrew Digby, Daryl Eason, Bruce C. Robertson20, Taylor Edwards21, Mark Wilkinson22, George F. Turner23, Axel Meyer24, Andreas F. Kautt25, Andreas F. Kautt24, Paolo Franchini24, H. William Detrich26, Hannes Svardal27, Hannes Svardal28, Maximilian Wagner29, Gavin J. P. Naylor30, Martin Pippel11, Milan Malinsky31, Milan Malinsky2, Mark Mooney, Maria Simbirsky, Brett T. Hannigan, Trevor Pesout32, Marlys L. Houck33, Ann C Misuraca33, Sarah B. Kingan34, Richard Hall34, Zev N. Kronenberg34, Ivan Sović34, Christopher Dunn34, Zemin Ning2, Alex Hastie, Joyce V. Lee, Siddarth Selvaraj, Richard E. Green32, Nicholas H. Putnam, Ivo Gut35, Jay Ghurye36, Erik Garrison32, Ying Sims2, Joanna Collins2, Sarah Pelan2, James Torrance2, Alan Tracey2, Jonathan Wood2, Robel E. Dagnew8, Dengfeng Guan3, Dengfeng Guan37, Sarah E. London38, David F. Clayton19, Claudio V. Mello39, Samantha R. Friedrich39, Peter V. Lovell39, Ekaterina Osipova11, Farooq O. Al-Ajli40, Farooq O. Al-Ajli41, Simona Secomandi42, Heebal Kim7, Constantina Theofanopoulou4, Michael Hiller43, Yang Zhou, Robert S. Harris44, Kateryna D. Makova44, Paul Medvedev44, Jinna Hoffman1, Patrick Masterson1, Karen Clark1, Fergal J. Martin9, Kevin L. Howe9, Paul Flicek9, Brian P. Walenz1, Woori Kwak, Hiram Clawson32, Mark Diekhans32, Luis R Nassar32, Benedict Paten32, Robert H. S. Kraus11, Robert H. S. Kraus24, Andrew J. Crawford45, M. Thomas P. Gilbert46, M. Thomas P. Gilbert47, Guojie Zhang, Byrappa Venkatesh48, Robert W. Murphy49, Klaus-Peter Koepfli50, Beth Shapiro32, Beth Shapiro51, Warren E. Johnson50, Warren E. Johnson52, Federica Di Palma53, Tomas Marques-Bonet, Emma C. Teeling54, Tandy Warnow55, Jennifer A. Marshall Graves56, Oliver A. Ryder57, Oliver A. Ryder33, David Haussler32, Stephen J. O'Brien58, Jonas Korlach34, Harris A. Lewin5, Kerstin Howe2, Eugene W. Myers11, Eugene W. Myers10, Richard Durbin3, Richard Durbin2, Adam M. Phillippy1, Erich D. Jarvis51, Erich D. Jarvis4 
National Institutes of Health1, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute2, University of Cambridge3, Rockefeller University4, University of California, Davis5, Leibniz Association6, Seoul National University7, University of Southern California8, European Bioinformatics Institute9, Dresden University of Technology10, Max Planck Society11, University of St Andrews12, Radboud University Nijmegen13, University of Massachusetts Amherst14, University of Adelaide15, University of Missouri16, East Carolina University17, University of Queensland18, Clemson University19, University of Otago20, University of Arizona21, Natural History Museum22, Bangor University23, University of Konstanz24, Harvard University25, Northeastern University26, University of Antwerp27, National Museum of Natural History28, University of Graz29, University of Florida30, University of Basel31, University of California, Santa Cruz32, Zoological Society of San Diego33, Pacific Biosciences34, Pompeu Fabra University35, University of Maryland, College Park36, Harbin Institute of Technology37, University of Chicago38, Oregon Health & Science University39, Monash University Malaysia Campus40, Qatar Airways41, University of Milan42, Goethe University Frankfurt43, Pennsylvania State University44, University of Los Andes45, Norwegian University of Science and Technology46, University of Copenhagen47, Agency for Science, Technology and Research48, Royal Ontario Museum49, Smithsonian Institution50, Howard Hughes Medical Institute51, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research52, University of East Anglia53, University College Dublin54, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign55, La Trobe University56, University of California, San Diego57, Nova Southeastern University58
28 Apr 2021-Nature
TL;DR: The Vertebrate Genomes Project (VGP) as mentioned in this paper is an international effort to generate high quality, complete reference genomes for all of the roughly 70,000 extant vertebrate species and to help to enable a new era of discovery across the life sciences.
Abstract: High-quality and complete reference genome assemblies are fundamental for the application of genomics to biology, disease, and biodiversity conservation. However, such assemblies are available for only a few non-microbial species1-4. To address this issue, the international Genome 10K (G10K) consortium5,6 has worked over a five-year period to evaluate and develop cost-effective methods for assembling highly accurate and nearly complete reference genomes. Here we present lessons learned from generating assemblies for 16 species that represent six major vertebrate lineages. We confirm that long-read sequencing technologies are essential for maximizing genome quality, and that unresolved complex repeats and haplotype heterozygosity are major sources of assembly error when not handled correctly. Our assemblies correct substantial errors, add missing sequence in some of the best historical reference genomes, and reveal biological discoveries. These include the identification of many false gene duplications, increases in gene sizes, chromosome rearrangements that are specific to lineages, a repeated independent chromosome breakpoint in bat genomes, and a canonical GC-rich pattern in protein-coding genes and their regulatory regions. Adopting these lessons, we have embarked on the Vertebrate Genomes Project (VGP), an international effort to generate high-quality, complete reference genomes for all of the roughly 70,000 extant vertebrate species and to help to enable a new era of discovery across the life sciences.

647 citations


Authors

Showing all 20718 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Yury Gogotsi171956144520
Philip S. Yu1481914107374
Aaron Dominguez1471968113224
Danny Miller13351271238
Marco Ajello13153558714
David C. Montefiori12992070049
Frank L. Lewis114104560497
Jianqing Fan10448858039
Wei Chen103143844994
Ken A. Dill9940141289
Gerald Schubert9861434505
Rod A. Wing9833347696
Feng Chen95213853881
Jimin George9433162684
François Diederich9384346906
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Texas A&M University
164.3K papers, 5.7M citations

97% related

Pennsylvania State University
196.8K papers, 8.3M citations

96% related

University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

96% related

Purdue University
163.5K papers, 5.7M citations

96% related

Michigan State University
137K papers, 5.6M citations

96% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202363
2022253
20212,407
20202,362
20192,080
20181,978