Institution
Clemson University
Education•Clemson, South Carolina, United States•
About: Clemson University is a education organization based out in Clemson, South Carolina, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Control theory. The organization has 20556 authors who have published 42518 publications receiving 1170779 citations. The organization is also known as: Clemson Agricultural College of South Carolina.
Topics: Population, Control theory, Poison control, Optical fiber, Fiber
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
01 Jan 2017TL;DR: An established research framework is adapted to structure the insights of the current body of research on blockchain technology, the present research scope as well as disregarded topics are outlined, and multidisciplinary research approaches are sketched out.
Abstract: While blockchain technology is commonly considered potentially disruptive in various regards, there is a lack of understanding where and how blockchain technology is effectively applicable and where it has mentionable practical effects. This issue has given rise to critical voices that judge the technology as over-hyped. Against this backdrop, this study adapts an established research framework to structure the insights of the current body of research on blockchain technology, outline the present research scope as well as disregarded topics, and sketch out multidisciplinary research approaches. The framework differentiates three groups of activities (design and features, measurement and value, management and organization) at four levels of analysis (users and society, intermediaries, platforms, firms and industry). The review shows that research has predominantly focused on technological questions of design and features, while neglecting application, value creation, and governance. In order to foster substantial blockchain research that addresses meaningful questions, this study identifies several avenues for future studies. Given the breadth of open questions, it shows where research can benefit from multidisciplinary collaborations and presents data sources as starting points for empirical investigations.
529 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a framework for examining the service recovery process and then report on an empirical study to test this framework, which not only validate much of what is anecdotally claimed by researchers and casual observers of service industries but also highlight the role of operational activities in service recovery.
528 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the measurement and utilization of the construct of golf travelers' perceived value, and find that current measures of perceived value may be inappropriate and do not capture the perceived value of a service.
Abstract: The construct of perceived value has been identified in the marketing literature as one of the most important measures for gaining competitive edge and has been argued to be the most important indicator of repurchase intentions. Yet, in the field of tourism, repurchase intentions and consumer loyalty are often predicted solely by measures of consumer satisfaction and/or service quality. One market in need of repurchase intention research is the golf traveler market. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the measurement and utilization of the construct of golf travelers’ perceived value. Results suggest that current measures of perceived value may be inappropriate and do not capture the construct of perceived value of a service. These findings indicate that theoretical development of perceived value is in need of further research and understanding. Managerial and theoretical implications are discussed.
523 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, it is argued that uniquely valuable synergy might be created where differences (versus similarities) exist between resources in the acquiring and target firms, and tests of these competing hypotheses confirmed that differences contributed significantly to performance in the merged firm.
522 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the extent to which offer prices reflect public information for 3,325 IPOs over the period 1990-1999, focusing primarily on four variables: share overhang, file range amendments, venture capital backing, and previous issue underpricing.
Abstract: We examine the extent to which offer prices reflect public information for 3,325 IPOs over the period 1990–1999. We focus primarily on four variables: share overhang, file range amendments, venture capital backing, and previous issue underpricing. We show that 35%–50% of the variation in IPO underpricing can be predicted using public information known before the offer date and therefore conclude that IPO offer prices underadjust to widely available public information to a much greater extent than previously documented.
521 citations
Authors
Showing all 20718 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Yury Gogotsi | 171 | 956 | 144520 |
Philip S. Yu | 148 | 1914 | 107374 |
Aaron Dominguez | 147 | 1968 | 113224 |
Danny Miller | 133 | 512 | 71238 |
Marco Ajello | 131 | 535 | 58714 |
David C. Montefiori | 129 | 920 | 70049 |
Frank L. Lewis | 114 | 1045 | 60497 |
Jianqing Fan | 104 | 488 | 58039 |
Wei Chen | 103 | 1438 | 44994 |
Ken A. Dill | 99 | 401 | 41289 |
Gerald Schubert | 98 | 614 | 34505 |
Rod A. Wing | 98 | 333 | 47696 |
Feng Chen | 95 | 2138 | 53881 |
Jimin George | 94 | 331 | 62684 |
François Diederich | 93 | 843 | 46906 |