scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Colorado School of Mines

EducationGolden, Colorado, United States
About: Colorado School of Mines is a education organization based out in Golden, Colorado, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Hydrate & Clathrate hydrate. The organization has 9294 authors who have published 20601 publications receiving 602711 citations. The organization is also known as: Mines & CSM.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: M mothur is used as a case study to trim, screen, and align sequences; calculate distances; assign sequences to operational taxonomic units; and describe the α and β diversity of eight marine samples previously characterized by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragments.
Abstract: mothur aims to be a comprehensive software package that allows users to use a single piece of software to analyze community sequence data. It builds upon previous tools to provide a flexible and powerful software package for analyzing sequencing data. As a case study, we used mothur to trim, screen, and align sequences; calculate distances; assign sequences to operational taxonomic units; and describe the alpha and beta diversity of eight marine samples previously characterized by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragments. This analysis of more than 222,000 sequences was completed in less than 2 h with a laptop computer.

17,350 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Evan Bolyen1, Jai Ram Rideout1, Matthew R. Dillon1, Nicholas A. Bokulich1, Christian C. Abnet2, Gabriel A. Al-Ghalith3, Harriet Alexander4, Harriet Alexander5, Eric J. Alm6, Manimozhiyan Arumugam7, Francesco Asnicar8, Yang Bai9, Jordan E. Bisanz10, Kyle Bittinger11, Asker Daniel Brejnrod7, Colin J. Brislawn12, C. Titus Brown4, Benjamin J. Callahan13, Andrés Mauricio Caraballo-Rodríguez14, John Chase1, Emily K. Cope1, Ricardo Silva14, Christian Diener15, Pieter C. Dorrestein14, Gavin M. Douglas16, Daniel M. Durall17, Claire Duvallet6, Christian F. Edwardson, Madeleine Ernst14, Madeleine Ernst18, Mehrbod Estaki17, Jennifer Fouquier19, Julia M. Gauglitz14, Sean M. Gibbons15, Sean M. Gibbons20, Deanna L. Gibson17, Antonio Gonzalez14, Kestrel Gorlick1, Jiarong Guo21, Benjamin Hillmann3, Susan Holmes22, Hannes Holste14, Curtis Huttenhower23, Curtis Huttenhower24, Gavin A. Huttley25, Stefan Janssen26, Alan K. Jarmusch14, Lingjing Jiang14, Benjamin D. Kaehler27, Benjamin D. Kaehler25, Kyo Bin Kang28, Kyo Bin Kang14, Christopher R. Keefe1, Paul Keim1, Scott T. Kelley29, Dan Knights3, Irina Koester14, Tomasz Kosciolek14, Jorden Kreps1, Morgan G. I. Langille16, Joslynn S. Lee30, Ruth E. Ley31, Ruth E. Ley32, Yong-Xin Liu, Erikka Loftfield2, Catherine A. Lozupone19, Massoud Maher14, Clarisse Marotz14, Bryan D Martin20, Daniel McDonald14, Lauren J. McIver24, Lauren J. McIver23, Alexey V. Melnik14, Jessica L. Metcalf33, Sydney C. Morgan17, Jamie Morton14, Ahmad Turan Naimey1, Jose A. Navas-Molina14, Jose A. Navas-Molina34, Louis-Félix Nothias14, Stephanie B. Orchanian, Talima Pearson1, Samuel L. Peoples20, Samuel L. Peoples35, Daniel Petras14, Mary L. Preuss36, Elmar Pruesse19, Lasse Buur Rasmussen7, Adam R. Rivers37, Michael S. Robeson38, Patrick Rosenthal36, Nicola Segata8, Michael Shaffer19, Arron Shiffer1, Rashmi Sinha2, Se Jin Song14, John R. Spear39, Austin D. Swafford, Luke R. Thompson40, Luke R. Thompson41, Pedro J. Torres29, Pauline Trinh20, Anupriya Tripathi14, Peter J. Turnbaugh10, Sabah Ul-Hasan42, Justin J. J. van der Hooft43, Fernando Vargas, Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza14, Emily Vogtmann2, Max von Hippel44, William A. Walters32, Yunhu Wan2, Mingxun Wang14, Jonathan Warren45, Kyle C. Weber37, Kyle C. Weber46, Charles H. D. Williamson1, Amy D. Willis20, Zhenjiang Zech Xu14, Jesse R. Zaneveld20, Yilong Zhang47, Qiyun Zhu14, Rob Knight14, J. Gregory Caporaso1 
TL;DR: QIIME 2 development was primarily funded by NSF Awards 1565100 to J.G.C. and R.K.P. and partial support was also provided by the following: grants NIH U54CA143925 and U54MD012388.
Abstract: QIIME 2 development was primarily funded by NSF Awards 1565100 to J.G.C. and 1565057 to R.K. Partial support was also provided by the following: grants NIH U54CA143925 (J.G.C. and T.P.) and U54MD012388 (J.G.C. and T.P.); grants from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (J.G.C. and R.K.); ERCSTG project MetaPG (N.S.); the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences QYZDB-SSW-SMC021 (Y.B.); the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council APP1085372 (G.A.H., J.G.C., Von Bing Yap and R.K.); the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) to D.L.G.; and the State of Arizona Technology and Research Initiative Fund (TRIF), administered by the Arizona Board of Regents, through Northern Arizona University. All NCI coauthors were supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute. S.M.G. and C. Diener were supported by the Washington Research Foundation Distinguished Investigator Award.

8,821 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Keith A. Olive1, Kaustubh Agashe2, Claude Amsler3, Mario Antonelli  +222 moreInstitutions (107)
TL;DR: The review as discussed by the authors summarizes much of particle physics and cosmology using data from previous editions, plus 3,283 new measurements from 899 Japers, including the recently discovered Higgs boson, leptons, quarks, mesons and baryons.
Abstract: The Review summarizes much of particle physics and cosmology. Using data from previous editions, plus 3,283 new measurements from 899 Japers, we list, evaluate, and average measured properties of gauge bosons and the recently discovered Higgs boson, leptons, quarks, mesons, and baryons. We summarize searches for hypothetical particles such as heavy neutrinos, supersymmetric and technicolor particles, axions, dark photons, etc. All the particle properties and search limits are listed in Summary Tables. We also give numerous tables, figures, formulae, and reviews of topics such as Supersymmetry, Extra Dimensions, Particle Detectors, Probability, and Statistics. Among the 112 reviews are many that are new or heavily revised including those on: Dark Energy, Higgs Boson Physics, Electroweak Model, Neutrino Cross Section Measurements, Monte Carlo Neutrino Generators, Top Quark, Dark Matter, Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking, Accelerator Physics of Colliders, High-Energy Collider Parameters, Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, Astrophysical Constants and Cosmological Parameters.

7,337 citations

Book
01 Jan 1990
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared the properties of hydrates and ice with those of natural gas and showed the effect of thermodynamic inhibitors on the formation of hydrate formation and dissolution process.
Abstract: PREFACE Overview and Historical Perspective Hydrates as a Laboratory Curiosity Hydrates in the Natural Gas Industry Hydrates as an Energy Resource Environmental Aspects of Hydrates Safety Aspects of Hydrates Relationship of This Chapter to Those That Follow Molecular Structures and Similarities to Ice Crystal Structures of Ice Ih and Natural Gas Hydrates Comparison of Properties of Hydrates and Ice The What and the How of Hydrate Structures Hydrate Formation and Dissociation Processes Hydrate Nucleation Hydrate Growth Hydrate Dissociation Estimation Techniques for Phase Equilibria of Natural Gas Hydrates Hydrate Phase Diagrams for Water + Hydrocarbon Systems Three-Phase (LW-H-V) Equilibrium Calculations Quadruple Points and Equilibrium of Three Condensed Phases (LW-H-LHC) Effect of Thermodynamic Inhibitors on Hydrate Formation Two-Phase Equilibrium: Hydrates with One Other Phase Hydrate Enthalpy and Hydration Number from Phase Equilibrium Summary and Relationship to Chapters Which Follow A Statistical Thermodynamic Approach to Hydrate Phase Equilibria Statistical Thermodynamics of Hydrate Equilibria Application of the Method to Analyze Systems of Methane + Ethane + Propane Computer Simulation: Another Microscopic-Macroscopic Bridge Summary Experimental Methods and Measurements of Hydrate Properties Experimental Apparatuses and Methods for Macroscopic Measurements Measurements of the Hydrate Phase Data for Natural Gas Hydrate Phase Equilibria and Thermal Properties Summary and Relationship to Chapters that Follow References Hydrates in the Earth The Paradigm Is Changing from Assessment of Amount to Production of Gas Sediments with Hydrates Typically Have Low Contents of Biogenic Methane Sediment Lithology and Fluid Flow Are Major Controls on Hydrate Deposition Remote Methods Enable an Estimation of the Extent of a Hydrated Reservoir Drilling Logs and/or Coring Provide Improved Assessments of Hydrated Gas Amounts Hydrate Reservoir Models Indicate Key Variables for Methane Production Future Hydrated Gas Production Trends Are from the Permafrost to the Ocean Hydrates Play a Part in Climate Change and Geohazards Summary Hydrates in Production, Processing, and Transportation How Do Hydrate Plugs Form in Industrial Equipment? How Are Hydrate Plug Formations Prevented? How Is a Hydrate Plug Dissociated? Safety and Hydrate Plug Removal Applications to Gas Transport and Storage Summary of Hydrates in Flow Assurance and Transportation APPENDICES INDEX

6,037 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A novel method for sparse signal recovery that in many situations outperforms ℓ1 minimization in the sense that substantially fewer measurements are needed for exact recovery.
Abstract: It is now well understood that (1) it is possible to reconstruct sparse signals exactly from what appear to be highly incomplete sets of linear measurements and (2) that this can be done by constrained l1 minimization. In this paper, we study a novel method for sparse signal recovery that in many situations outperforms l1 minimization in the sense that substantially fewer measurements are needed for exact recovery. The algorithm consists of solving a sequence of weighted l1-minimization problems where the weights used for the next iteration are computed from the value of the current solution. We present a series of experiments demonstrating the remarkable performance and broad applicability of this algorithm in the areas of sparse signal recovery, statistical estimation, error correction and image processing. Interestingly, superior gains are also achieved when our method is applied to recover signals with assumed near-sparsity in overcomplete representations—not by reweighting the l1 norm of the coefficient sequence as is common, but by reweighting the l1 norm of the transformed object. An immediate consequence is the possibility of highly efficient data acquisition protocols by improving on a technique known as Compressive Sensing.

4,869 citations


Authors

Showing all 9362 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Zhen Li127171271351
Shaobin Wang12687252463
Jian Liu117209073156
Richard S.J. Tol11669548587
Vladimir Bulovic10547048711
Ming Li103166962672
Gregory A. Voth10064841570
Sanford J. Shattil9923930840
George G. Malliaras9438228533
Zongping Shao9476439128
Randall Q. Snurr8836836133
Albert Ferrando8741936793
Keywan Riahi8731858030
San Ping Jiang8552826619
YangQuan Chen84104836543
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Delft University of Technology
94.4K papers, 2.7M citations

91% related

Georgia Institute of Technology
119K papers, 4.6M citations

89% related

Texas A&M University
164.3K papers, 5.7M citations

88% related

Rice University
56.3K papers, 2.6M citations

88% related

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
66.5K papers, 4.1M citations

87% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202334
2022142
20211,482
20201,521
20191,379
20181,212