Institution
Colorado State University
Education•Fort Collins, Colorado, United States•
About: Colorado State University is a education organization based out in Fort Collins, Colorado, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Radar. The organization has 31430 authors who have published 69040 publications receiving 2724463 citations. The organization is also known as: CSU & Colorado Agricultural College.
Topics: Population, Radar, Poison control, Laser, Soil water
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, three methods for calculating the parameters of the Weibull wind speed distribution for wind energy analysis are presented: the maximum likelihood method, the proposed modified maximum likelihood (MML) method, and the commonly used graphical method.
864 citations
••
TL;DR: An information-theoretic paradigm for analysis of ecological data, based on Kullback–Leibler information, that is an extension of likelihood theory and avoids the pitfalls of null hypothesis testing is described.
Abstract: We describe an information-theoretic paradigm for analysis of ecological data, based on Kullback–Leibler information, that is an extension of likelihood theory and avoids the pitfalls of null hypothesis testing. Information-theoretic approaches emphasise a deliberate focus on the a priori science in developing a set of multiple working hypotheses or models. Simple methods then allow these hypotheses (models) to be ranked from best to worst and scaled to reflect a strength of evidence using the likelihood of each model (gi), given the data and the models in the set (i.e. L(gi | data)). In addition, a variance component due to model-selection uncertainty is included in estimates of precision. There are many cases where formal inference can be based on all the models in the a priori set and this multi-model inference represents a powerful, new approach to valid inference. Finally, we strongly recommend inferences based on a priori considerations be carefully separated from those resulting from some form of data dredging. An example is given for questions related to age- and sex-dependent rates of tag loss in elephant seals (Mirounga leonina).
863 citations
•
01 Jan 1993TL;DR: This paper reviewed the book "Stewardship: Choosing Service over Self-Interest" by Peter Block and found that it is a good book to read for anyone interested in service.
Abstract: The article reviews the book “Stewardship: Choosing Service Over Self-Interest,” by Peter Block.
861 citations
••
Indiana University1, Buck Institute for Research on Aging2, University of California, San Francisco3, University of California, Santa Cruz4, Colorado State University5, University of Colorado Denver6, University of California, Berkeley7, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai8, European Bioinformatics Institute9, University of Bologna10, University of Missouri11, University of Bristol12, University of Helsinki13, University College London14, Centre for Development of Advanced Computing15, Purdue University16, Baylor College of Medicine17, Royal Holloway, University of London18, Technische Universität München19, University of Turku20, Queen's University21, University UCINF22, Max Planck Society23, Imperial College London24, Wageningen University and Research Centre25, Nestlé26, Fudan University27, University of Padua28, Temple University29, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics30, University of Geneva31, Hebrew University of Jerusalem32, Miami University33
TL;DR: Today's best protein function prediction algorithms substantially outperform widely used first-generation methods, with large gains on all types of targets, and there is considerable need for improvement of currently available tools.
Abstract: Automated annotation of protein function is challenging. As the number of sequenced genomes rapidly grows, the overwhelming majority of protein products can only be annotated computationally. If computational predictions are to be relied upon, it is crucial that the accuracy of these methods be high. Here we report the results from the first large-scale community-based critical assessment of protein function annotation (CAFA) experiment. Fifty-four methods representing the state of the art for protein function prediction were evaluated on a target set of 866 proteins from 11 organisms. Two findings stand out: (i) today's best protein function prediction algorithms substantially outperform widely used first-generation methods, with large gains on all types of targets; and (ii) although the top methods perform well enough to guide experiments, there is considerable need for improvement of currently available tools.
859 citations
••
TL;DR: The authors have attracted diverse ideas about meaningful work (MW), accompanied by an equally disparate collection of ways of assessing the work that is meaningful and meaningful. But, as they point out, many people desire work that they believe is meaningful.
Abstract: Many people desire work that is meaningful. However, research in this area has attracted diverse ideas about meaningful work (MW), accompanied by an equally disparate collection of ways of assessin...
857 citations
Authors
Showing all 31766 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Mark P. Mattson | 200 | 980 | 138033 |
Stephen J. O'Brien | 153 | 1062 | 93025 |
Ad Bax | 138 | 486 | 97112 |
David Price | 138 | 1687 | 93535 |
Georgios B. Giannakis | 137 | 1321 | 73517 |
James Mueller | 134 | 1194 | 87738 |
Christopher B. Field | 133 | 408 | 88930 |
Steven W. Running | 126 | 355 | 76265 |
Simon Lin | 126 | 754 | 69084 |
Jitender P. Dubey | 124 | 1344 | 77275 |
Gregory P. Asner | 123 | 613 | 60547 |
Steven P. DenBaars | 118 | 1366 | 60343 |
Peter Molnar | 118 | 446 | 53480 |
William R. Jacobs | 118 | 490 | 48638 |
C. Patrignani | 117 | 1754 | 110008 |