scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Colorado State University

EducationFort Collins, Colorado, United States
About: Colorado State University is a education organization based out in Fort Collins, Colorado, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Radar. The organization has 31430 authors who have published 69040 publications receiving 2724463 citations. The organization is also known as: CSU & Colorado Agricultural College.
Topics: Population, Radar, Poison control, Laser, Soil water


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, three methods for calculating the parameters of the Weibull wind speed distribution for wind energy analysis are presented: the maximum likelihood method, the proposed modified maximum likelihood (MML) method, and the commonly used graphical method.

864 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An information-theoretic paradigm for analysis of ecological data, based on Kullback–Leibler information, that is an extension of likelihood theory and avoids the pitfalls of null hypothesis testing is described.
Abstract: We describe an information-theoretic paradigm for analysis of ecological data, based on Kullback–Leibler information, that is an extension of likelihood theory and avoids the pitfalls of null hypothesis testing. Information-theoretic approaches emphasise a deliberate focus on the a priori science in developing a set of multiple working hypotheses or models. Simple methods then allow these hypotheses (models) to be ranked from best to worst and scaled to reflect a strength of evidence using the likelihood of each model (gi), given the data and the models in the set (i.e. L(gi | data)). In addition, a variance component due to model-selection uncertainty is included in estimates of precision. There are many cases where formal inference can be based on all the models in the a priori set and this multi-model inference represents a powerful, new approach to valid inference. Finally, we strongly recommend inferences based on a priori considerations be carefully separated from those resulting from some form of data dredging. An example is given for questions related to age- and sex-dependent rates of tag loss in elephant seals (Mirounga leonina).

863 citations

Book
01 Jan 1993
TL;DR: This paper reviewed the book "Stewardship: Choosing Service over Self-Interest" by Peter Block and found that it is a good book to read for anyone interested in service.
Abstract: The article reviews the book “Stewardship: Choosing Service Over Self-Interest,” by Peter Block.

861 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Predrag Radivojac1, Wyatt T. Clark1, Tal Ronnen Oron2, Alexandra M. Schnoes3, Tobias Wittkop2, Artem Sokolov4, Artem Sokolov5, Kiley Graim5, Christopher S. Funk6, Karin Verspoor6, Asa Ben-Hur5, Gaurav Pandey7, Gaurav Pandey8, Jeffrey M. Yunes7, Ameet Talwalkar7, Susanna Repo9, Susanna Repo7, Michael L Souza7, Damiano Piovesan10, Rita Casadio10, Zheng Wang11, Jianlin Cheng11, Hai Fang, Julian Gough12, Patrik Koskinen13, Petri Törönen13, Jussi Nokso-Koivisto13, Liisa Holm13, Domenico Cozzetto14, Daniel W. A. Buchan14, Kevin Bryson14, David T. Jones14, Bhakti Limaye15, Harshal Inamdar15, Avik Datta15, Sunitha K Manjari15, Rajendra Joshi15, Meghana Chitale16, Daisuke Kihara16, Andreas Martin Lisewski17, Serkan Erdin17, Eric Venner17, Olivier Lichtarge17, Robert Rentzsch14, Haixuan Yang18, Alfonso E. Romero18, Prajwal Bhat18, Alberto Paccanaro18, Tobias Hamp19, Rebecca Kaßner19, Stefan Seemayer19, Esmeralda Vicedo19, Christian Schaefer19, Dominik Achten19, Florian Auer19, Ariane Boehm19, Tatjana Braun19, Maximilian Hecht19, Mark Heron19, Peter Hönigschmid19, Thomas A. Hopf19, Stefanie Kaufmann19, Michael Kiening19, Denis Krompass19, Cedric Landerer19, Yannick Mahlich19, Manfred Roos19, Jari Björne20, Tapio Salakoski20, Andrew Wong21, Hagit Shatkay21, Hagit Shatkay22, Fanny Gatzmann23, Ingolf Sommer23, Mark N. Wass24, Michael J.E. Sternberg24, Nives Škunca, Fran Supek, Matko Bošnjak, Panče Panov, Sašo Džeroski, Tomislav Šmuc, Yiannis A. I. Kourmpetis25, Yiannis A. I. Kourmpetis26, Aalt D. J. van Dijk25, Cajo J. F. ter Braak25, Yuanpeng Zhou27, Qingtian Gong27, Xinran Dong27, Weidong Tian27, Marco Falda28, Paolo Fontana, Enrico Lavezzo28, Barbara Di Camillo28, Stefano Toppo28, Liang Lan29, Nemanja Djuric29, Yuhong Guo29, Slobodan Vucetic29, Amos Marc Bairoch30, Amos Marc Bairoch31, Michal Linial32, Patricia C. Babbitt3, Steven E. Brenner7, Christine A. Orengo14, Burkhard Rost19, Sean D. Mooney2, Iddo Friedberg33 
TL;DR: Today's best protein function prediction algorithms substantially outperform widely used first-generation methods, with large gains on all types of targets, and there is considerable need for improvement of currently available tools.
Abstract: Automated annotation of protein function is challenging. As the number of sequenced genomes rapidly grows, the overwhelming majority of protein products can only be annotated computationally. If computational predictions are to be relied upon, it is crucial that the accuracy of these methods be high. Here we report the results from the first large-scale community-based critical assessment of protein function annotation (CAFA) experiment. Fifty-four methods representing the state of the art for protein function prediction were evaluated on a target set of 866 proteins from 11 organisms. Two findings stand out: (i) today's best protein function prediction algorithms substantially outperform widely used first-generation methods, with large gains on all types of targets; and (ii) although the top methods perform well enough to guide experiments, there is considerable need for improvement of currently available tools.

859 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors have attracted diverse ideas about meaningful work (MW), accompanied by an equally disparate collection of ways of assessing the work that is meaningful and meaningful. But, as they point out, many people desire work that they believe is meaningful.
Abstract: Many people desire work that is meaningful. However, research in this area has attracted diverse ideas about meaningful work (MW), accompanied by an equally disparate collection of ways of assessin...

857 citations


Authors

Showing all 31766 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Mark P. Mattson200980138033
Stephen J. O'Brien153106293025
Ad Bax13848697112
David Price138168793535
Georgios B. Giannakis137132173517
James Mueller134119487738
Christopher B. Field13340888930
Steven W. Running12635576265
Simon Lin12675469084
Jitender P. Dubey124134477275
Gregory P. Asner12361360547
Steven P. DenBaars118136660343
Peter Molnar11844653480
William R. Jacobs11849048638
C. Patrignani1171754110008
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

94% related

University of California, Davis
180K papers, 8M citations

94% related

Pennsylvania State University
196.8K papers, 8.3M citations

94% related

University of Wisconsin-Madison
237.5K papers, 11.8M citations

93% related

Cornell University
235.5K papers, 12.2M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023159
2022500
20213,596
20203,492
20193,340
20183,136