scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Colorado State University

EducationFort Collins, Colorado, United States
About: Colorado State University is a education organization based out in Fort Collins, Colorado, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Laser. The organization has 31430 authors who have published 69040 publications receiving 2724463 citations. The organization is also known as: CSU & Colorado Agricultural College.
Topics: Population, Laser, Radar, Poison control, Soil water


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Monika Böhm1, Ben Collen1, Jonathan E. M. Baillie1, Philip Bowles2  +240 moreInstitutions (95)
TL;DR: The results provide the first analysis of the global conservation status and distribution patterns of reptiles and the threats affecting them, highlighting conservation priorities and knowledge gaps which need to be addressed urgently to ensure the continued survival of the world’s reptiles.

720 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The most appropriate management practices to increase soil carbon sink capacity vary regionally, dependent on both environmental and socioeconomic factors as discussed by the authors. But, effective mitigation policies will not be based on any single ‘magic bullet’ solutions, but rather on many modest reductions which are economically efficient and which confer additional benefits to society.
Abstract: . Agricultural soils, having been depleted of much of their native carbon stocks, have a significant CO2 sink capacity. Global estimates of this sink capacity are in the order of 20-30 Pg C over the next 50-100 years. Management practices to build up soil C must increase the input of organic matter to soil and/or decrease soil organic matter decomposition rates. The most appropriate management practices to increase soil C vary regionally, dependent on both environmental and socioeconomic factors. In temperate regions, key strategies involve increasing cropping frequency and reducing bare fallow, increasing the use of perennial forages (including N-fixing species) in crop rotations, retaining crop residues and reducing or eliminating tillage (i.e. no-till). In North America and Europe, conversion of marginal arable land to permanent perennial vegetation, to protect fragile soils and landscapes and/or reduce agricultural surpluses, provides additional opportunities for C sequestration. In the tropics, increasing C inputs to soil through improving the fertility and productivity of cropland and pastures is essential. In extensive systems with vegetated fallow periods (e.g. shifting cultivation), planted fallows and cover crops can increase C levels over the cropping cycle. Use of no-till, green manures and agroforestry are other beneficial practices. Overall, improving the productivity and sustainability of existing agricultural lands is crucial to help reduce the rate of new land clearing, from which large amounts of CO2 from biomass and soil are emitted to the atmosphere. Some regional analyses of soil C sequestration and sequestration potential have been performed, mainly for temperate industrialized countries. More are needed, especially for the tropics, to capture region-specific interactions between climate, soil and management resources that are lost in global level assessments. By itself, C sequestration in agricultural soils can make only modest contributions (e.g. 3-6% of total fossil C emissions) to mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. However, effective mitigation policies will not be based on any single ‘magic bullet’ solutions, but rather on many modest reductions which are economically efficient and which confer additional benefits to society. In this context, soil C sequestration is a significant mitigation option. Additional advantages of pursuing strategies to increase soil C are the added benefits of improved soil quality for improving agricultural productivity and sustainability.

720 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a new approach for preparing graphitic carbon nanofiber and nanotube ensembles was developed, which entails chemical vapor deposition (CVD) based synthesis of carbon within the pores of an alumina template membrane with or without a Ni catalyst.
Abstract: We have developed a new approach for preparing graphitic carbon nanofiber and nanotube ensembles. This approach entails chemical vapor deposition (CVD) based synthesis of carbon within the pores of an alumina template membrane with or without a Ni catalyst. Ethylene or pyrene was used in the CVD process with reactor temperatures of 545 °C for Ni-catalyzed CVD and 900 °C for the uncatalyzed process. The resultant carbon nanostructures were uniform hollow tubes with open ends. Increasing the deposition time converted the carbon nanotubes into carbon nanofibers. Transmission electron microscopy and electron diffraction data show the as deposited graphitic carbon nanofibers synthesized with the Ni catalyst were not highly ordered. Heating the carbon-containing membrane at 500 °C for 36 h, however, converts the carbon nanofibers into highly ordered graphite. The electron diffraction data show a spotted diffraction pattern characteristic of single-crystal graphite with the graphitic planes parallel to the long ...

719 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Marlee A. Tucker1, Katrin Böhning-Gaese1, William F. Fagan2, John M. Fryxell3, Bram Van Moorter, Susan C. Alberts4, Abdullahi H. Ali, Andrew M. Allen5, Andrew M. Allen6, Nina Attias7, Tal Avgar8, Hattie L. A. Bartlam-Brooks9, Buuveibaatar Bayarbaatar10, Jerrold L. Belant11, Alessandra Bertassoni12, Dean E. Beyer13, Laura R. Bidner14, Floris M. van Beest15, Stephen Blake16, Stephen Blake10, Niels Blaum17, Chloe Bracis1, Danielle D. Brown18, P J Nico de Bruyn19, Francesca Cagnacci20, Francesca Cagnacci21, Justin M. Calabrese2, Justin M. Calabrese22, Constança Camilo-Alves23, Simon Chamaillé-Jammes24, André Chiaradia25, André Chiaradia26, Sarah C. Davidson27, Sarah C. Davidson16, Todd E. Dennis28, Stephen DeStefano29, Duane R. Diefenbach30, Iain Douglas-Hamilton31, Iain Douglas-Hamilton32, Julian Fennessy, Claudia Fichtel33, Wolfgang Fiedler16, Christina Fischer34, Ilya R. Fischhoff35, Christen H. Fleming2, Christen H. Fleming22, Adam T. Ford36, Susanne A. Fritz1, Benedikt Gehr37, Jacob R. Goheen38, Eliezer Gurarie39, Eliezer Gurarie2, Mark Hebblewhite40, Marco Heurich41, Marco Heurich42, A. J. Mark Hewison43, Christian Hof, Edward Hurme2, Lynne A. Isbell14, René Janssen, Florian Jeltsch17, Petra Kaczensky44, Adam Kane45, Peter M. Kappeler33, Matthew J. Kauffman38, Roland Kays46, Roland Kays47, Duncan M. Kimuyu48, Flávia Koch33, Flávia Koch49, Bart Kranstauber37, Scott D. LaPoint50, Scott D. LaPoint16, Peter Leimgruber22, John D. C. Linnell, Pascual López-López51, A. Catherine Markham52, Jenny Mattisson, Emília Patrícia Medici53, Ugo Mellone54, Evelyn H. Merrill8, Guilherme Miranda de Mourão55, Ronaldo Gonçalves Morato, Nicolas Morellet43, Thomas A. Morrison56, Samuel L. Díaz-Muñoz57, Samuel L. Díaz-Muñoz14, Atle Mysterud58, Dejid Nandintsetseg1, Ran Nathan59, Aidin Niamir, John Odden, Robert B. O'Hara60, Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira-Santos7, Kirk A. Olson10, Bruce D. Patterson61, Rogério Cunha de Paula, Luca Pedrotti, Björn Reineking62, Björn Reineking63, Martin Rimmler, Tracey L. Rogers64, Christer Moe Rolandsen, Christopher S. Rosenberry65, Daniel I. Rubenstein66, Kamran Safi16, Kamran Safi67, Sonia Saïd, Nir Sapir68, Hall Sawyer, Niels Martin Schmidt15, Nuria Selva69, Agnieszka Sergiel69, Enkhtuvshin Shiilegdamba10, João P. Silva70, João P. Silva71, João P. Silva72, Navinder J. Singh6, Erling Johan Solberg, Orr Spiegel14, Olav Strand, Siva R. Sundaresan, Wiebke Ullmann17, Ulrich Voigt44, Jake Wall32, David W. Wattles29, Martin Wikelski16, Martin Wikelski67, Christopher C. Wilmers73, John W. Wilson74, George Wittemyer75, George Wittemyer32, Filip Zięba, Tomasz Zwijacz-Kozica, Thomas Mueller22, Thomas Mueller1 
Goethe University Frankfurt1, University of Maryland, College Park2, University of Guelph3, Duke University4, Radboud University Nijmegen5, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences6, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul7, University of Alberta8, Royal Veterinary College9, Wildlife Conservation Society10, Mississippi State University11, Sao Paulo State University12, Michigan Department of Natural Resources13, University of California, Davis14, Aarhus University15, Max Planck Society16, University of Potsdam17, Middle Tennessee State University18, Mammal Research Institute19, Harvard University20, Edmund Mach Foundation21, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute22, University of Évora23, University of Montpellier24, Monash University25, Parks Victoria26, Ohio State University27, Fiji National University28, University of Massachusetts Amherst29, United States Geological Survey30, University of Oxford31, Save the Elephants32, German Primate Center33, Technische Universität München34, Institute of Ecosystem Studies35, University of British Columbia36, University of Zurich37, University of Wyoming38, University of Washington39, University of Montana40, Bavarian Forest National Park41, University of Freiburg42, University of Toulouse43, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna44, University College Cork45, North Carolina State University46, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences47, Karatina University48, University of Lethbridge49, Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory50, University of Valencia51, Stony Brook University52, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources53, University of Alicante54, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária55, University of Glasgow56, New York University57, University of Oslo58, Hebrew University of Jerusalem59, Norwegian University of Science and Technology60, Field Museum of Natural History61, University of Bayreuth62, University of Grenoble63, University of New South Wales64, Pennsylvania Game Commission65, Princeton University66, University of Konstanz67, University of Haifa68, Polish Academy of Sciences69, University of Lisbon70, Instituto Superior de Agronomia71, University of Porto72, University of California, Santa Cruz73, University of Pretoria74, Colorado State University75
26 Jan 2018-Science
TL;DR: Using a unique GPS-tracking database of 803 individuals across 57 species, it is found that movements of mammals in areas with a comparatively high human footprint were on average one-half to one-third the extent of their movements in area with a low human footprint.
Abstract: Animal movement is fundamental for ecosystem functioning and species survival, yet the effects of the anthropogenic footprint on animal movements have not been estimated across species. Using a unique GPS-tracking database of 803 individuals across 57 species, we found that movements of mammals in areas with a comparatively high human footprint were on average one-half to one-third the extent of their movements in areas with a low human footprint. We attribute this reduction to behavioral changes of individual animals and to the exclusion of species with long-range movements from areas with higher human impact. Global loss of vagility alters a key ecological trait of animals that affects not only population persistence but also ecosystem processes such as predator-prey interactions, nutrient cycling, and disease transmission.

719 citations


Authors

Showing all 31766 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Mark P. Mattson200980138033
Stephen J. O'Brien153106293025
Ad Bax13848697112
David Price138168793535
Georgios B. Giannakis137132173517
James Mueller134119487738
Christopher B. Field13340888930
Steven W. Running12635576265
Simon Lin12675469084
Jitender P. Dubey124134477275
Gregory P. Asner12361360547
Steven P. DenBaars118136660343
Peter Molnar11844653480
William R. Jacobs11849048638
C. Patrignani1171754110008
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

94% related

University of California, Davis
180K papers, 8M citations

94% related

Pennsylvania State University
196.8K papers, 8.3M citations

94% related

University of Wisconsin-Madison
237.5K papers, 11.8M citations

93% related

Cornell University
235.5K papers, 12.2M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023159
2022500
20213,596
20203,492
20193,340
20183,136