Institution
Concordia University
Education•Montreal, Quebec, Canada•
About: Concordia University is a education organization based out in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Control theory & Population. The organization has 13565 authors who have published 31084 publications receiving 783525 citations. The organization is also known as: Sir George Williams University & Loyola College, Montreal.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, a multi-objective optimization model that could assist designers in green building design is presented, which includes those parameters that are usually determined at the conceptual design stage and that have critical influence on building performance.
673 citations
••
TL;DR: Using a reinstatement procedure, it is shown that exposure to intermittent footshock stress reliably reinstates heroin and cocaine seeking after prolonged drug-free periods.
671 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a comprehensive literature review of TiO2 modification techniques that include approaches for overcoming the inherentTiO2 limitations and improving the photocatalytic degradation of VOCs.
667 citations
••
TL;DR: The authors investigated the role of context of learning in second language (L2) acquisition and found that learners in the SA context made greater gains, both in terms of temporal and hesitation phenomena and in oral proficiency as measured by the oral proficiency interview (OPI).
Abstract: This study investigates the role of context of learning in second language (L2) acquisition. Participants were 40 native speakers of English studying Spanish for one semester in one of two different learning contexts—a formal classroom at a home university (AH) and a study abroad (SA) setting. The research looks at various indexes of oral performance gains—particularly gains in oral fluency as measured by temporal and hesitation phenomena and gains in oral proficiency based on the Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI). The study also examines the relation these oral gains bore to L2-specific cognitive measures of speed of lexical access (word recognition), efficiency (automaticity) of lexical access, and speed and efficiency of attention control hypothesized to underlie oral performance. The learners also provided estimates of the number of hours they spent in extracurricular language-contact activities. The results show that in some respects learners in the SA context made greater gains, both in terms of temporal and hesitation phenomena and in oral proficiency as measured by the OPI, than learners in the AH context. There were also, however, significant interaction effects and correlational patterns indicating complex relationships between oral proficiency, cognitive abilities, and language contact. The results demonstrate the importance of the dynamic interactions that exist among oral, cognitive, and contextual variables. Such interactions may help explain the enormous individual variation one sees in learning outcomes, and they underscore the importance of studying such variables together rather than in isolation.This research was funded in part by a grant to Barbara F. Freed from the Council on International Educational Exchange, New York, in part by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to Norman Segalowitz, and in part by a grant from the Dean's Office, Faculty of Arts and Science at Concordia University, to Segalowitz. The authors wish to thank Joe Collentine, Manuel Diaz-Campos, and Barbara Lafford, who are members of the research team involved in the larger project of which this study is one part. A special note of thanks is due to Nicole Lazar, who is also a member of the research team, for her invaluable statistical advice. Finally, the authors would like to thank Conchita Bueno, Hazel Casas, Elizabeth Gatbonton, Randall Halter, Guy Lacroix, Anne-Marie Linnen, Magnolia Negrete, Irene O'Brien, Laura Renteria-Diaz, Marlene Taube, and Naomi Yamasaki, who helped during various phases of this project.
658 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated the relative contributions of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and victimization by peers in predicting feelings of loneliness and depressed mood over time, and concluded that self-reported loneliness ultimately mediates the subsequent depressed mood associated with withdrawal and negative peer experiences.
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative contributions of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and victimization by peers in predicting feelings of loneliness and depressed mood over time. According to the proposed model, the feelings of loneliness associated with social withdrawal are mediated by the negative peer experiences (negative peer status and peer victimization) to which withdrawn children are exposed. In predicting depressed mood over time, it was further hypothesized that self-reported loneliness ultimately mediates the subsequent depressed mood associated with withdrawal and negative peer experiences. The study was conducted across 2 consecutive years (Time 1 and Time 2), with children each year nominating peers for peer status, social withdrawal, and victimization measures, and completing self-report measures of loneliness and depressed mood. Fourth- and fifth-grade children participated at Time 1, and children that remained in the same school were again evaluated at Time 2 (N = 567). A series of regression analyses indicated that the postulated sequence of mediations adequately represented the pattern of longitudinal associations between the variables, as well as their pattern of change over time. The contribution of social withdrawal to the prediction of subsequent loneliness was accounted for by the expected pattern of mediations of negative peer experiences. Self-reported loneliness ultimately mediated the subsequent depressed mood associated with withdrawal and negative peer experiences.
656 citations
Authors
Showing all 13754 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Alan C. Evans | 183 | 866 | 134642 |
Michael J. Meaney | 136 | 604 | 81128 |
Chao Zhang | 127 | 3119 | 84711 |
Charles Spence | 111 | 949 | 51159 |
Angappa Gunasekaran | 101 | 586 | 40633 |
Kaushik Roy | 97 | 1402 | 42661 |
Muthiah Manoharan | 96 | 497 | 44464 |
Stephen J. Simpson | 95 | 490 | 30226 |
Roy A. Wise | 95 | 252 | 39509 |
Dario Farina | 94 | 832 | 32786 |
Yavin Shaham | 94 | 239 | 29596 |
Elazer R. Edelman | 89 | 593 | 29980 |
Fikret Berkes | 88 | 271 | 49585 |
Ke Wu | 87 | 1242 | 33226 |
Nick Serpone | 85 | 474 | 30532 |