scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Concordia University

EducationMontreal, Quebec, Canada
About: Concordia University is a education organization based out in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Context (language use) & Control theory. The organization has 13565 authors who have published 31084 publications receiving 783525 citations. The organization is also known as: Sir George Williams University & Loyola College, Montreal.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The research on subtypes of OCD is reviewed, focusing on subtype schemes based upon overt symptom presentation and neuropsychological profiles, and research pertinent to alternative subtyping schemes are reviewed, both conceptually and methodologically.

555 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a model of knowledge sharing motivation based on a combination of the theory of planned behavior and self-determination theory is presented, along with suggestions for future research and methodologies to study knowledgesharing behavior.
Abstract: In this article, I present a model of knowledge-sharing motivation based on a combination of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and self-determination theory (SDT), along with a review of research supporting the model and suggestions for future research and methodologies to study knowledgesharing behavior. I also give suggestions for designing five important human resource management (HRM) practices, including staffing, job design, performance and compensation systems, managerial styles, and training. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

555 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
04 Jun 2020-Nature
TL;DR: The results obtained by seventy different teams analysing the same functional magnetic resonance imaging dataset show substantial variation, highlighting the influence of analytical choices and the importance of sharing workflows publicly and performing multiple analyses.
Abstract: Data analysis workflows in many scientific domains have become increasingly complex and flexible. Here we assess the effect of this flexibility on the results of functional magnetic resonance imaging by asking 70 independent teams to analyse the same dataset, testing the same 9 ex-ante hypotheses1. The flexibility of analytical approaches is exemplified by the fact that no two teams chose identical workflows to analyse the data. This flexibility resulted in sizeable variation in the results of hypothesis tests, even for teams whose statistical maps were highly correlated at intermediate stages of the analysis pipeline. Variation in reported results was related to several aspects of analysis methodology. Notably, a meta-analytical approach that aggregated information across teams yielded a significant consensus in activated regions. Furthermore, prediction markets of researchers in the field revealed an overestimation of the likelihood of significant findings, even by researchers with direct knowledge of the dataset2-5. Our findings show that analytical flexibility can have substantial effects on scientific conclusions, and identify factors that may be related to variability in the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging. The results emphasize the importance of validating and sharing complex analysis workflows, and demonstrate the need for performing and reporting multiple analyses of the same data. Potential approaches that could be used to mitigate issues related to analytical variability are discussed.

551 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Intentions from developing a set of recommendations on behalf of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping are described and barriers that impede these practices are identified, including how the discipline must change to fully exploit the potential of the world's neuroimaging data.
Abstract: Given concerns about the reproducibility of scientific findings, neuroimaging must define best practices for data analysis, results reporting, and algorithm and data sharing to promote transparency, reliability and collaboration. We describe insights from developing a set of recommendations on behalf of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping and identify barriers that impede these practices, including how the discipline must change to fully exploit the potential of the world's neuroimaging data.

544 citations


Authors

Showing all 13754 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Alan C. Evans183866134642
Michael J. Meaney13660481128
Chao Zhang127311984711
Charles Spence11194951159
Angappa Gunasekaran10158640633
Kaushik Roy97140242661
Muthiah Manoharan9649744464
Stephen J. Simpson9549030226
Roy A. Wise9525239509
Dario Farina9483232786
Yavin Shaham9423929596
Elazer R. Edelman8959329980
Fikret Berkes8827149585
Ke Wu87124233226
Nick Serpone8547430532
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Arizona State University
109.6K papers, 4.4M citations

93% related

Georgia Institute of Technology
119K papers, 4.6M citations

92% related

McGill University
162.5K papers, 6.9M citations

92% related

University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

92% related

University of British Columbia
209.6K papers, 9.2M citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202375
2022343
20211,859
20201,861
20191,734
20181,680