Cooperative Research Centre

About: Cooperative Research Centre is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Sea ice. The organization has 7633 authors who have published 8607 publications receiving 429721 citations.

Determining the sources of suspended sediment in a forested catchment in southeastern Australia

Abstract: [1] Knowledge is scarce regarding the relative contributions from harvested areas and unsealed roads to sediments in forested catchments. We investigate the source composition of suspended sediment using sediment tracers and an improved multivariate mixing model. Sediment samples were collected during six rainfall events. Geochemical and radiometric tracer properties were corrected for particle size and organic content as well as conservativeness during erosion and sediment delivery. The mixing model incorporates variability of the tracer properties, using a Monte Carlo simulation technique. Mean sediment contribution from the undisturbed forest was 50–70%; harvested areas, gravel-surfaced roads, and ungravelled roads contributed 5–15%, 6–14%, and 12–25%, respectively. The unsealed roads contribute 20 to 60 times more sediment than the undisturbed forest and about 10 times more sediment than the harvested areas on a per unit area basis. Harvested areas contribute 1 to 5 times greater sediment than the undisturbed forest. These results support other studies that identify unsealed roads as important sediment sources in forested catchments.

Operationalizing biodiversity for conservation planning.

Abstract: Biodiversity has acquired such a general meaning that people now find it difficult to pin down a precise sense for planning and policy-making aimed at biodiversity conservation. Because biodiversity is rooted in place, the task of conserving biodiversity should target places for conservation action; and because all places contain biodiversity, but not all places can be targeted for action, places have to be prioritized. What is needed for this is a measure of the extent to which biodiversity varies from place to place. We do not need a precise measure of biodiversity to prioritize places. Relative estimates of similarity or difference can be derived using partial measures, or what have come to be called biodiversity surrogates. Biodiversity surrogates are supposed to stand in for general biodiversity in planning applications. We distinguish between true surrogates, those that might truly stand in for general biodiversity, and estimator surrogates, which have true surrogates as their target variable. For example, species richness has traditionally been the estimator surrogate for the true surrogate, species diversity. But species richness does not capture the differences in composition between places; the essence of biodiversity. Another measure, called complementarity, explicitly captures the differences between places as we iterate the process of place prioritization, starting with an initial place. The relative concept of biodiversity built into the definition of complementarity has the level of precision needed to undertake conservation planning.