scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Copenhagen Business School

EducationCopenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark
About: Copenhagen Business School is a education organization based out in Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Corporate governance & Context (language use). The organization has 2194 authors who have published 9649 publications receiving 341898 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the relationship between home and offshore R&D activities on the knowledge production of the investing home region and suggested that complementarity should obtain, when home and offshoring activities are dissimilar as well as when offshore activities are about modular and less complex technologies.
Abstract: This paper investigates the relationship between home and offshore R&D activities on the knowledge production of the investing home region. Debate is ongoing on whether R&D offshoring complements the R&D performed at home. In the light of increased offshoring of innovative activities to emerging countries, we explicitly focus on Brazil, Russia, India, China, Singapore and Taiwan. We suggest that complementarity should obtain, when home region and offshore R&D activities are dissimilar as well as when offshore R&D activities is about modular and less complex technologies. We ground our predictions on arguments related to geographical technological specialisation and reverse knowledge transfer from offshore locations to home regions within the more general open innovation trend. Using a theoretical framework based on the international business literature and the regional system of innovation perspective, we estimate a knowledge production function for a sample of 221 regions from 21 OECD countries with home region patent applications as the dependent variable. Our test supports our predictions on the complementarity between home region and offshore R&D. (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

120 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce a four-factor framework to investigate two main questions: why is shipping lagging in its environmental governance; and what is the potential for the International Maritime Organization to orchestrate emerging private "green shipping" initiatives to achieve better ecological outcomes.
Abstract: Maritime shipping is the transmission belt of the global economy. It is also a major contributor to global environmental change through its under-regulated air, water and land impacts. It is puzzling that shipping is a lagging sector as it has a well-established global regulatory body—the International Maritime Organization. Drawing on original empirical evidence and archival data, we introduce a four-factor framework to investigate two main questions: why is shipping lagging in its environmental governance; and what is the potential for the International Maritime Organization to orchestrate emerging private ‘green shipping’ initiatives to achieve better ecological outcomes? Contributing to transnational governance theory, we find that conditions stalling regulatory progress include low environmental issue visibility, poor interest alignment, a broadening scope of environmental issues, and growing regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty. The paper concludes with pragmatic recommendations for the International Maritime Organization to acknowledge the regulatory difficulties and seize the opportunity to orchestrate environmental progress.

119 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify ways by which the theorizing of supply chain management takes place, with particular attention to complementary theories, and portray SCM sensitivity to managerial challenges by moving from borrowing to a more bilateral view on theorizing, reflecting the nature of SCM.
Abstract: Purpose Supply chain management (SCM) suffers as well as benefits from a ‘conceptual slack’. The aim of this paper is to identify ways by which the theorizing of SCM takes place, with particular attention to complementary theories. Design/methodology/approach The nature of SCM is discussed, and the role and relevance of theorizing is addressed by using key characteristics of ‘academic scholarship’ based on a literature review of SCM and evaluation of application of theory and theory development. Findings The integrative and multi-layered nature of SCM sets the conditions for ‘theorizing SCM’ that can take place through various forms: theory application, new theoretical combinations, and sensitivity to managerial practice. It is pivotal that future research explore further the performative potential of SCM. Research limitations/implications Research with focus on theory development or using complementary theories to advancing understanding of SCM can benefit from the five building blocks of theorizing SCM proposed in the paper. Practical implications Theoretical principles in SCM are not only used to describe practical problems, but also used to ‘produce the world’; supply chains can be seen as organizational units that act or consummate an action that delivers a particular performance. Originality/value We portray SCM sensitivity to managerial challenges by moving from borrowing to a more bilateral view on theorizing of SCM, reflecting the nature of SCM.

119 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the importance of technology-based intersectoral linkages for market share dynamics was investigated in an empirical model of international market share and the Pavitt taxonomy was applied as a yardstick for interpreting the empirical results.
Abstract: The Importance of Technology-Based Intersectoral Linkages for Market Share Dynamics. — The paper introduces technology-based intersectoral linkages (or technological spillovers) in an empirical model of international market share dynamics. The Pavitt taxonomy is applied as a yardstick for interpreting the empirical results. Overall, the results appear to be broadly consistent with the criteria behind the taxonomy, on the relative importance of the different factors of competitiveness in the different sectors. In particular, unit labour costs appear to play the largest role in supplier-dominated industries, ‘own sector’ technological activity plays the largest role in science-based industries, upstream linkages in scale-intensive and downstream linkages in specialized-supplier types of industries.

119 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a conceptual model is developed and tested on a set of primary data of Danish firms and their foreign market operations, and it is shown that factors considered essential in traditional internationalization process theory, such as experiential learning, explain only a very limited part of perceived knowledge gaps.
Abstract: The study explores how firms close their knowledge gaps in relation to business environments of foreign markets. Potential determinants are derived from traditional internationalization process theory as well as more recent literature on organizational learning processes, including the concept of absorptive capacity. Building on these two literature streams a conceptual model is developed and tested on a set of primary data of Danish firms and their foreign market operations. The empirical study suggests that factors considered essential in traditional internationalization process theory, such as experiential learning, explains only a very limited part of perceived knowledge gaps. When factors pertaining to the concepts of absorptive capacity and superstitious learning are added, the explanatory power improves significantly. Apparently, our understanding of firms' internationalization processes can be enriched by insights from organizational learning literature.

119 citations


Authors

Showing all 2280 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Cass R. Sunstein11778757639
John Campbell107115056067
Nicolai J. Foss9145431803
Stewart Clegg7051723021
Robert J. Kauffman6943715762
James R. Markusen6721626362
Timo Teräsvirta6222420403
John D. Sterman6217127982
Björn Johansson6263716030
Richard L. Baskerville6128418796
Torben Pedersen6124114499
Peter Christoffersen5920815208
Saul Estrin5835916448
Ram Mudambi5623613562
Xin Li5621411450
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Stockholm School of Economics
4.8K papers, 285.5K citations

93% related

Bocconi University
8.9K papers, 344.1K citations

90% related

Athens University of Economics and Business
6.9K papers, 177.8K citations

89% related

University of Mannheim
12.9K papers, 446.5K citations

88% related

HEC Montréal
5.7K papers, 196.8K citations

88% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202329
2022144
2021584
2020534
2019453
2018452