scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Copenhagen Business School

EducationCopenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark
About: Copenhagen Business School is a education organization based out in Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Corporate governance & Entrepreneurship. The organization has 2194 authors who have published 9649 publications receiving 341898 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the role of formal institutions and informal networks on corporate governance practices was examined in the case of Denmark, Norway and Sweden, and it was shown that trust, information diffusion and reputation mechanisms are active governance mechanisms.
Abstract: This article addresses the role of formal institutions and informal networks on corporate governance practices. The existing corporate governance literature has mostly examined the formal institutions, such as the effect of legal systems. Our contribution is to consider the effect of informal “small world” characteristics of ownership and board networks. We use the case of Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway and Sweden) to examine these effects. Our empirical results reveal large differences in formal board and ownership structures between the Scandinavian countries, but strong similarities in terms of law enforcement, political stability, government effectiveness, rule of law, control of corruption as well as voice and accountability. We find that all three countries can be characterized as “small worlds” in which trust, information diffusion and reputation mechanisms are active governance mechanisms. (Less)

92 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2003
TL;DR: The use of unsuitable transfer mechanisms may cause loss of knowledge in the process of transmission or may involve unnecessarily high communication costs, both with potentially negative effects on the performance of the MNC as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The effective dissemination throughout the MNC organization of valuable knowledge acquired by its local affiliates is seen as an important source of competitive advantage. Knowledge differs in characteristics and so do the available transfer mechanism. As such, it is essential that the MNC employ the mechanism of transfer that suits the specific knowledge characteristics. The use of unsuitable transfer mechanisms may cause loss of knowledge in the process of transmission or may involve unnecessarily high communication costs — both with potentially negative effects on the performance of the MNC.

92 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Danish consumers from Roskilde and Holstebro rated nine different samples of pork on an unstructured hedonic scale from "do not like at all" to "like very much", finding that all the consumers preferred tender, juicy meat with a fried flavour and no off-flavours.

92 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a platform-based view of competition in digital markets, present three distinct types of platform markets, the key elements affecting the value of a platform based service, and the competitive logics that shape competition in these markets.
Abstract: The increasing digitization of the economy and the rapid ascent of platform-based businesses is altering not just the kind of products and services that companies produce but critically, the way they generate value and deliver it to final customers. This trend brings along a shit in the economics and the underlying nature of competition, affecting the fundamental way firms compete in digital markets. In this article, we offer a platform-based view of competition in digital markets, present three distinct types of platform markets, the key elements affecting the value of a platform-based service, and the competitive logics that shape competition in these markets. We introduce the concept of platform identity to delineate the platform’s technological and market profile that will determine the platform’s competitive identity domain; and distinguish it from platform size (which reflects the scale of its user and complementor network). We argue that each platform has a unique identity, and comparisons of rival platforms along these two strategic dimensions – platform size and platform identity – can help to understand the nature of competition in digital markets and explain some of the unique competitive dynamics that depart from mainstream competitive theory’s predictions. Our framework also helps to identify cases where the market boundaries and competitive domains get contested because of platform competition, leading to market convergence. We discuss how the proposed framework can enrich and extend existing theory on competitive dynamics to the context of digital markets and offer a foundation for future research.

92 citations


Authors

Showing all 2280 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Cass R. Sunstein11778757639
John Campbell107115056067
Nicolai J. Foss9145431803
Stewart Clegg7051723021
Robert J. Kauffman6943715762
James R. Markusen6721626362
Timo Teräsvirta6222420403
John D. Sterman6217127982
Björn Johansson6263716030
Richard L. Baskerville6128418796
Torben Pedersen6124114499
Peter Christoffersen5920815208
Saul Estrin5835916448
Ram Mudambi5623613562
Xin Li5621411450
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Stockholm School of Economics
4.8K papers, 285.5K citations

93% related

Bocconi University
8.9K papers, 344.1K citations

90% related

Athens University of Economics and Business
6.9K papers, 177.8K citations

89% related

University of Mannheim
12.9K papers, 446.5K citations

88% related

HEC Montréal
5.7K papers, 196.8K citations

88% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202329
2022144
2021584
2020534
2019453
2018452