Institution
Copenhagen Business School
Education•Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark•
About: Copenhagen Business School is a education organization based out in Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Corporate governance & Entrepreneurship. The organization has 2194 authors who have published 9649 publications receiving 341898 citations.
Topics: Corporate governance, Entrepreneurship, Corporate social responsibility, Context (language use), European union
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, the role of formal institutions and informal networks on corporate governance practices was examined in the case of Denmark, Norway and Sweden, and it was shown that trust, information diffusion and reputation mechanisms are active governance mechanisms.
Abstract: This article addresses the role of formal institutions and informal networks on corporate governance practices. The existing corporate governance literature has mostly examined the formal institutions, such as the effect of legal systems. Our contribution is to consider the effect of informal “small world” characteristics of ownership and board networks. We use the case of Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway and Sweden) to examine these effects. Our empirical results reveal large differences in formal board and ownership structures between the Scandinavian countries, but strong similarities in terms of law enforcement, political stability, government effectiveness, rule of law, control of corruption as well as voice and accountability. We find that all three countries can be characterized as “small worlds” in which trust, information diffusion and reputation mechanisms are active governance mechanisms. (Less)
92 citations
••
01 Jan 2003TL;DR: The use of unsuitable transfer mechanisms may cause loss of knowledge in the process of transmission or may involve unnecessarily high communication costs, both with potentially negative effects on the performance of the MNC as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The effective dissemination throughout the MNC organization of valuable knowledge acquired by its local affiliates is seen as an important source of competitive advantage.
Knowledge differs in characteristics and so do the available transfer mechanism. As such, it is essential that the MNC employ the mechanism of transfer that suits the specific knowledge characteristics. The use of unsuitable transfer mechanisms may cause loss of knowledge in the process of transmission or may involve unnecessarily high communication costs — both with potentially negative effects on the performance of the MNC.
92 citations
•
University College Dublin1, University of Naples Federico II2, Leiden University3, Copenhagen Business School4, AGH University of Science and Technology5, University of Oulu6, Royal Institute of Technology7, Politehnica University of Bucharest8, University of Cambridge9, Lund University10, University of Sussex11, University of Bergen12, University of Zagreb13
92 citations
••
TL;DR: Danish consumers from Roskilde and Holstebro rated nine different samples of pork on an unstructured hedonic scale from "do not like at all" to "like very much", finding that all the consumers preferred tender, juicy meat with a fried flavour and no off-flavours.
92 citations
•
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a platform-based view of competition in digital markets, present three distinct types of platform markets, the key elements affecting the value of a platform based service, and the competitive logics that shape competition in these markets.
Abstract: The increasing digitization of the economy and the rapid ascent of platform-based businesses is altering not just the kind of products and services that companies produce but critically, the way they generate value and deliver it to final customers. This trend brings along a shit in the economics and the underlying nature of competition, affecting the fundamental way firms compete in digital markets. In this article, we offer a platform-based view of competition in digital markets, present three distinct types of platform markets, the key elements affecting the value of a platform-based service, and the competitive logics that shape competition in these markets. We introduce the concept of platform identity to delineate the platform’s technological and market profile that will determine the platform’s competitive identity domain; and distinguish it from platform size (which reflects the scale of its user and complementor network). We argue that each platform has a unique identity, and comparisons of rival platforms along these two strategic dimensions – platform size and platform identity – can help to understand the nature of competition in digital markets and explain some of the unique competitive dynamics that depart from mainstream competitive theory’s predictions. Our framework also helps to identify cases where the market boundaries and competitive domains get contested because of platform competition, leading to market convergence. We discuss how the proposed framework can enrich and extend existing theory on competitive dynamics to the context of digital markets and offer a foundation for future research.
92 citations
Authors
Showing all 2280 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Cass R. Sunstein | 117 | 787 | 57639 |
John Campbell | 107 | 1150 | 56067 |
Nicolai J. Foss | 91 | 454 | 31803 |
Stewart Clegg | 70 | 517 | 23021 |
Robert J. Kauffman | 69 | 437 | 15762 |
James R. Markusen | 67 | 216 | 26362 |
Timo Teräsvirta | 62 | 224 | 20403 |
John D. Sterman | 62 | 171 | 27982 |
Björn Johansson | 62 | 637 | 16030 |
Richard L. Baskerville | 61 | 284 | 18796 |
Torben Pedersen | 61 | 241 | 14499 |
Peter Christoffersen | 59 | 208 | 15208 |
Saul Estrin | 58 | 359 | 16448 |
Ram Mudambi | 56 | 236 | 13562 |
Xin Li | 56 | 214 | 11450 |