Institution
Copenhagen Business School
Education•Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark•
About: Copenhagen Business School is a education organization based out in Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Corporate governance & Entrepreneurship. The organization has 2194 authors who have published 9649 publications receiving 341898 citations.
Topics: Corporate governance, Entrepreneurship, Corporate social responsibility, Context (language use), European union
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
[...]
TL;DR: In this article, the ontological constitution of Bitcoin is analyzed and it is argued that Bitcoin is commodity money without gold, fiat money without a state, and credit money without debt, and that Bitcoin poses an ideological challenge to conventional forms of money in so far as it not only provokes sedimented beliefs about money but also exposes the forms of exploitation, risk and even violence inherent in the existing system of state authorized credit money.
Abstract: Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer electronic payment system that operates as an independent currency. This paper is a philosophical investigation of the ontological constitution of Bitcoin. Using Slavoj Žižek’s ontological triad of the real, the symbolic and the imaginary, the paper distinguishes between three ideal typical theories of money: commodity theory, fiat theory, and credit theory. The constitution of Bitcoin is analysed by comparing the currency to each of these ideal types. It is argued that Bitcoin is commodity money without gold, fiat money without a state, and credit money without debt. In conclusion, it is suggested that Bitcoin poses an ideological challenge to conventional forms of money in so far as it not only provokes sedimented beliefs about money but also exposes the forms of exploitation, risk and even violence inherent in the existing system of state authorized credit money.
88 citations
••
TL;DR: Quality control is an important and integrated part of the scientific system as discussed by the authors, however, developments in science and society are changing quality control into quality monitoring, and new, virtual, and fluid organizational forms are emerging.
Abstract: Quality control is an important and integrated part of the scientific system. However, developments in science and society are changing quality control into quality monitoring. New, virtual, and fluid organizational forms are emerging. Common boundaries are seen as being broken down as, for example, in the “triple helix” and the “mode 2” concepts. The stakeholders in science are showing an interest in being more involved in science. They want their evaluation criteria to be used, and they want evaluations to be done on a regular basis because they do not trust the new scientific institutions to be left on their own. Quality monitoring changes the requirements for conducting evaluations as part of quality control. Assessing the societal value of research becomes increasingly important. Finally, quality monitoring emphasizes organizational learning rather than controlling quality in scientific organizations.
88 citations
••
TL;DR: This study addresses a major gap in knowledge about the allocation of information technology (IT) decision rights between business and IT units at the application level, including the governance of applications delivered on-premise versus those delivered with a software-as-a-service (SaaS) model.
Abstract: This study addresses a major gap in our knowledge about the allocation of information technology (IT) decision rights between business and IT units at the application level, including the governance of applications delivered on-premise versus those delivered with a software-as-a-service (SaaS) model. Building on the findings from a multicase qualitative study of organizations that had adopted the same SaaS application, we draw on three theoretical lenses (agency theory, transaction cost economics, and knowledge-based view) to develop a theoretically grounded model with three organization-level factors, three application-level factors, and application-level IT governance. Hypotheses derived from the model, as well as a set of differential hypotheses about factor influences due to on-premise versus SaaS delivery, are tested with survey responses from 207 firms in which application-level governance is operationalized with two dimensions: decision control rights (decision authority) and decision management ri...
88 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors characterize a knowledge governance approach as a distinctive, emerging field that cuts across the fields of knowledge management, organisation studies, strategy and human resource management, taking up with how the deployment of administrative apparatus influences knowledge processes, such as sharing, retaining and creating knowledge.
Abstract: An attempt is made to characterize a "knowledge governance approach" as a distinctive, emerging field that cuts across the fields of knowledge management, organisation studies, strategy and human resource management. Knowledge governance is taken up with how the deployment of administrative apparatus influences knowledge processes, such as sharing, retaining and creating knowledge. It insists on clear behavioural foundations, adopts an economizing perspective and examines efficient alignment between knowledge transactions with diverse characteristics and governance structures and mechanisms with diverse capabilities of handling these transactions. Various open research issues that a knowledge governance approach may illuminate are sketched. Although knowledge governance draws clear inspiration from organizational economics and "rational" organization theory, it recognizes that knowledge represents various challenges to more "closed" social science disciplines, notably economics.
88 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, a theoretical framework is proposed to explain how Global Wealth Chains (GWCs) are created, maintained, and governed, and five types of GWC governance are differentiated: Market, Modular, Relational, Captive, and Hierarchy.
Abstract: This article offers a theoretical framework to explain how Global Wealth Chains (GWCs) are created, maintained, and governed. We draw upon different strands of literature, including scholarship in International Political Economy and Economic Geography on Global Value Chains, literature on finance and law in Institutional Economics, and work from Economic Sociology on network dynamics within markets. This scholarship assists us in highlighting three variables in how GWCs are articulated and change according to: (1) the complexity of transactions, (2) regulatory liability, and (3) innovation capacities among suppliers of products used in wealth chains. We then differentiate five types of GWC governance – Market, Modular, Relational, Captive, and Hierarchy – which range from simple ‘off shelf’ products shielded from regulators by advantageous international tax laws to highly complex and flexible innovative financial products produced by large financial institutions and corporations. This article high...
88 citations
Authors
Showing all 2280 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Cass R. Sunstein | 117 | 787 | 57639 |
John Campbell | 107 | 1150 | 56067 |
Nicolai J. Foss | 91 | 454 | 31803 |
Stewart Clegg | 70 | 517 | 23021 |
Robert J. Kauffman | 69 | 437 | 15762 |
James R. Markusen | 67 | 216 | 26362 |
Timo Teräsvirta | 62 | 224 | 20403 |
John D. Sterman | 62 | 171 | 27982 |
Björn Johansson | 62 | 637 | 16030 |
Richard L. Baskerville | 61 | 284 | 18796 |
Torben Pedersen | 61 | 241 | 14499 |
Peter Christoffersen | 59 | 208 | 15208 |
Saul Estrin | 58 | 359 | 16448 |
Ram Mudambi | 56 | 236 | 13562 |
Xin Li | 56 | 214 | 11450 |