Institution
Copenhagen Business School
Education•Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark•
About: Copenhagen Business School is a education organization based out in Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Corporate governance & Entrepreneurship. The organization has 2194 authors who have published 9649 publications receiving 341898 citations.
Topics: Corporate governance, Entrepreneurship, Corporate social responsibility, Context (language use), European union
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that job design matters to knowledge sharing for motivational reasons, and they develop six hypotheses that unfold these ideas and test them on the basis of individual-level data collected within a single firm.
Abstract: Job design is one of the most frequently researched practices in the Human Resource Management (HRM) literature, and knowledge sharing has become an important and heavily researched managerial practice The links between these practices, however, have received little attention in the literature We argue that job design matters to knowledge sharing for motivational reasons Specifically, jobs contain characteristics that stimulate different kinds of motivation toward knowledge sharing, which have different effects on individual knowledge sharing behavior We develop six hypotheses that unfold these ideas and test them on the basis of individual-level data collected within a single firm The hypotheses are tested in a LISREL model that confirms that job characteristics, such as autonomy, task identity, and feedback, determine different motivations to share knowledge, which in turn predict employees' knowledge sharing behaviors © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc
396 citations
••
TL;DR: The need to study problems from multiple perspectives, to move beyond narrow considerations of the IT artifact, and to venture into underexplored organizational contexts, such as the public sector are among the key issues emerged.
Abstract: Information systems success and failure are among the most prominent streams in IS research. Explanations of why some IS fulfill their expectations, whereas others fail, are complex and multi-factorial. Despite the efforts to understand the underlying factors, the IS failure rate remains stubbornly high. A Panel session was held at the IFIP Working Group 8.6 conference in Bangalore in 2013 which forms the subject of this Special Issue. Its aim was to reflect on the need for new perspectives and research directions, to provide insights and further guidance for managers on factors enabling IS success and avoiding IS failure. Several key issues emerged, such as the need to study problems from multiple perspectives, to move beyond narrow considerations of the IT artifact, and to venture into underexplored organizational contexts, such as the public sector.
393 citations
••
TL;DR: The knowledge governance approach as discussed by the authors is characterized as a distinctive, emerging approach that cuts across the fields of knowledge management, organisation studies, strategy, and human resource management, and is taken up with how the deployment of governance mechanisms influences knowledge processes, such as sharing, retaining and creating knowledge.
Abstract: The “knowledge governance approach” is characterized as a distinctive, emerging approach that cuts across the fields of knowledge management, organisation studies, strategy, and human resource management. Knowledge governance is taken up with how the deployment of governance mechanisms influences knowledge processes, such as sharing, retaining and creating knowledge. It insists on clear micro (behavioural) foundations, adopts an economizing perspective, and examines the links between knowledge-based units of analysis with diverse characteristics and governance mechanisms with diverse capabilities of handling these transactions. Research issues that the knowledge governance approach illuminates are sketched.
392 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss and develop SCM as a scientific discipline using different theories from non-logistics areas to explain interorganizational Phenomena and establish a frame of reference that allows us to mitigate the gap between the current SCM research and the theoretical explanations of how to structure and manage supply chains.
Abstract: Purpose – The paper seeks to discuss and develop SCM as a scientific discipline using different theories from non-logistics areas to explain interorganizational
phenomena. It also attempts to establish a frame of reference that allows us to mitigate the gap between the current SCM research and
practice and the theoretical explanations of how to structure and manage supply chains.
Design/methodology/approach – The paper introduces three different perspectives that together will contribute to a broader understanding of SCM
in practice: an economic perspective; a socio-economic perspective; and a strategic perspective. The theoretical framework is applied to two important
research topics within SCM: third party logistics (TPL); and new product development (NPD).
Findings – There is no such thing as “a unified theory of SCM”. Depending on the concrete situation, one can choose one theory as the dominant
explanatory theory, and then complement it with one or several of the other theoretical perspectives.
Research limitations/implications – The way the four theories complement one another is explored on a conceptual basis, but further research into
this direction may explore more deeply how these alleged complementarities occur in practice, and how managers mould their decisions by these ideas.
Practical implications – The four theories can provide normative support to important management decisions in supply chains, such as outsourcing,
safeguards against opportunism, and alignment of incentives.
Originality/value – The main contribution is that one cannot rely on one theoretical explanation when analyzing phenomena in SCM. It is neccessary
to consider several theories and how they may complement one another in order to provide a more comprehensive view of SCM.
390 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the knowledge producers who have shaped the field over time and the knowledge users who have employed the core works in entrepreneurship in order to develop our knowledge of the phenomenon of entrepreneurship.
388 citations
Authors
Showing all 2280 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Cass R. Sunstein | 117 | 787 | 57639 |
John Campbell | 107 | 1150 | 56067 |
Nicolai J. Foss | 91 | 454 | 31803 |
Stewart Clegg | 70 | 517 | 23021 |
Robert J. Kauffman | 69 | 437 | 15762 |
James R. Markusen | 67 | 216 | 26362 |
Timo Teräsvirta | 62 | 224 | 20403 |
John D. Sterman | 62 | 171 | 27982 |
Björn Johansson | 62 | 637 | 16030 |
Richard L. Baskerville | 61 | 284 | 18796 |
Torben Pedersen | 61 | 241 | 14499 |
Peter Christoffersen | 59 | 208 | 15208 |
Saul Estrin | 58 | 359 | 16448 |
Ram Mudambi | 56 | 236 | 13562 |
Xin Li | 56 | 214 | 11450 |