Institution
Copenhagen Zoo
Archive•Copenhagen, Denmark•
About: Copenhagen Zoo is a archive organization based out in Copenhagen, Denmark. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Alfaxalone. The organization has 62 authors who have published 272 publications receiving 11715 citations. The organization is also known as: København Zoo.
Topics: Population, Alfaxalone, Threatened species, Endangered species, Gorilla
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Duke University1, University of Texas at Austin2, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies3, Xi'an Jiaotong University4, Beijing Genomics Institute5, American Museum of Natural History6, New Mexico State University7, University of Sydney8, University of California9, Uppsala University10, University of Copenhagen11, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology12, University of Georgia13, Griffith University14, Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies15, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research16, Oak Ridge National Laboratory17, Aarhus University18, Washington University in St. Louis19, University of California, Santa Cruz20, Cardiff University21, Kunming Institute of Zoology22, China Agricultural University23, Tulane University24, Louisiana State University25, Copenhagen Zoo26, Oregon Health & Science University27, Federal University of Pará28, Technical University of Denmark29, Canterbury Museum30, Curtin University31, Novosibirsk State University32, Smithsonian Institution33, National University of Singapore34, National Museum of Natural History35, Nova Southeastern University36, Occidental College37, University of Edinburgh38, Harvard University39, University of California, San Francisco40, University of Florida41, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign42
TL;DR: A genome-scale phylogenetic analysis of 48 species representing all orders of Neoaves recovered a highly resolved tree that confirms previously controversial sister or close relationships and identifies the first divergence in Neoaves, two groups the authors named Passerea and Columbea.
Abstract: To better determine the history of modern birds, we performed a genome-scale phylogenetic analysis of 48 species representing all orders of Neoaves using phylogenomic methods created to handle genome-scale data. We recovered a highly resolved tree that confirms previously controversial sister or close relationships. We identified the first divergence in Neoaves, two groups we named Passerea and Columbea, representing independent lineages of diverse and convergently evolved land and water bird species. Among Passerea, we infer the common ancestor of core landbirds to have been an apex predator and confirm independent gains of vocal learning. Among Columbea, we identify pigeons and flamingoes as belonging to sister clades. Even with whole genomes, some of the earliest branches in Neoaves proved challenging to resolve, which was best explained by massive protein-coding sequence convergence and high levels of incomplete lineage sorting that occurred during a rapid radiation after the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction event about 66 million years ago.
1,624 citations
Conservation International1, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources2, Sapienza University of Rome3, Texas A&M University4, Instituto Superior Técnico5, University of Cambridge6, Zoological Society of London7, Arizona State University8, Columbia University9, Wildlife Conservation Society10, National Scientific and Technical Research Council11, Imperial College London12, National University of Tucumán13, University of Tasmania14, University of the Philippines Los Baños15, University of Edinburgh16, Earthwatch Institute17, Drexel University18, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais19, Global Environment Facility20, University of Alberta21, Smithsonian Institution22, Université de Sherbrooke23, University of Virginia24, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources25, University of Calgary26, James Cook University27, NatureServe28, University of St Andrews29, Australian National University30, University of Montana31, General Post Office32, University of Otago33, Field Museum of Natural History34, Wildlife Institute of India35, Tokyo Woman's Christian University36, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration37, University of Aberdeen38, University of the Witwatersrand39, University of Oxford40, University Centre in Svalbard41, Norwegian Polar Institute42, Copenhagen Zoo43, San Diego State University44, University of Alaska Fairbanks45, Manchester Metropolitan University46, National Autonomous University of Mexico47, University of Kent48, City University of New York49, Victoria University of Wellington50, California Academy of Sciences51, Mote Marine Laboratory52, Osmania University53, White Oak Conservation54, Aaranyak55, University of California, Davis56, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi57, University of Stirling58
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a comprehensive assessment of the conservation status and distribution of the world's mammals, including marine mammals, using data collected by 1700+ experts, covering all 5487 species.
Abstract: Knowledge of mammalian diversity is still surprisingly disparate, both regionally and taxonomically. Here, we present a comprehensive assessment of the conservation status and distribution of the world's mammals. Data, compiled by 1700+ experts, cover all 5487 species, including marine mammals. Global macroecological patterns are very different for land and marine species but suggest common mechanisms driving diversity and endemism across systems. Compared with land species, threat levels are higher among marine mammals, driven by different processes (accidental mortality and pollution, rather than habitat loss), and are spatially distinct (peaking in northern oceans, rather than in Southeast Asia). Marine mammals are also disproportionately poorly known. These data are made freely available to support further scientific developments and conservation action.
1,383 citations
Michael R. Hoffmann1, Craig Hilton-Taylor2, Ariadne Angulo2, Monika Böhm3 +170 more•Institutions (81)
TL;DR: Though the threat of extinction is increasing, overall declines would have been worse in the absence of conservation, and current conservation efforts remain insufficient to offset the main drivers of biodiversity loss in these groups.
Abstract: Using data for 25,780 species categorized on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, we present an assessment of the status of the world's vertebrates. One-fifth of species are classified as Threatened, and we show that this figure is increasing: On average, 52 species of mammals, birds, and amphibians move one category closer to extinction each year. However, this overall pattern conceals the impact of conservation successes, and we show that the rate of deterioration would have been at least one-fifth again as much in the absence of these. Nonetheless, current conservation efforts remain insufficient to offset the main drivers of biodiversity loss in these groups: agricultural expansion, logging, overexploitation, and invasive alien species.
1,333 citations
University of Copenhagen1, Beijing Genomics Institute2, Royal Veterinary College3, Seoul National University4, University of Nebraska–Lincoln5, University of Porto6, University of South Carolina7, Montclair State University8, Uppsala University9, National University of Singapore10, University of California, Berkeley11, South China University of Technology12, Chinese Academy of Sciences13, Kunming Institute of Zoology14, Howard Hughes Medical Institute15, Aberystwyth University16, University of Kent17, University of California, Riverside18, Mississippi State University19, Austral University of Chile20, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences21, China Agricultural University22, Cardiff University23, Copenhagen Zoo24, Louisiana State University25, Washington University in St. Louis26, Xi'an Jiaotong University27, University of California, Santa Cruz28, Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center29, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute30, National Museum of Natural History31, Natural History Museum32, University of California, San Francisco33, Harvard University34, University of Florida35, University of Edinburgh36, New Mexico State University37, Macau University of Science and Technology38, Curtin University39
TL;DR: This work explored bird macroevolution using full genomes from 48 avian species representing all major extant clades to reveal that pan-avian genomic diversity covaries with adaptations to different lifestyles and convergent evolution of traits.
Abstract: Birds are the most species-rich class of tetrapod vertebrates and have wide relevance across many research fields. We explored bird macroevolution using full genomes from 48 avian species representing all major extant clades. The avian genome is principally characterized by its constrained size, which predominantly arose because of lineage-specific erosion of repetitive elements, large segmental deletions, and gene loss. Avian genomes furthermore show a remarkably high degree of evolutionary stasis at the levels of nucleotide sequence, gene synteny, and chromosomal structure. Despite this pattern of conservation, we detected many non-neutral evolutionary changes in protein-coding genes and noncoding regions. These analyses reveal that pan-avian genomic diversity covaries with adaptations to different lifestyles and convergent evolution of traits.
872 citations
Pompeu Fabra University1, University of Washington2, University of Michigan3, Stanford University4, Harvard University5, University of Arizona6, Max Planck Society7, Aarhus University8, Bilkent University9, University of Minnesota10, University of California, San Francisco11, Autonomous University of Barcelona12, Biomedical Primate Research Centre13, Duke University14, Washington State University15, Franklin & Marshall College16, University of Oxford17, University of Bari18, University of California, San Diego19, University of Copenhagen20, Washington University in St. Louis21, University of Pennsylvania22, National Institutes of Health23, State University of New York System24, Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies25, Copenhagen Zoo26, Howard Hughes Medical Institute27
TL;DR: This comprehensive catalogue of great ape genome diversity provides a framework for understanding evolution and a resource for more effective management of wild and captive great ape populations.
Abstract: Most great ape genetic variation remains uncharacterized; however, its study is critical for understanding population history, recombination, selection and susceptibility to disease. Here we sequence to high coverage a total of 79 wild- and captive-born individuals representing all six great ape species and seven subspecies and report 88.8 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Our analysis provides support for genetically distinct populations within each species, signals of gene flow, and the split of common chimpanzees into two distinct groups: Nigeria-Cameroon/western and central/eastern populations. We find extensive inbreeding in almost all wild populations, with eastern gorillas being the most extreme. Inferred effective population sizes have varied radically over time in different lineages and this appears to have a profound effect on the genetic diversity at, or close to, genes in almost all species. We discover and assign 1,982 loss-of-function variants throughout the human and great ape lineages, determining that the rate of gene loss has not been different in the human branch compared to other internal branches in the great ape phylogeny. This comprehensive catalogue of great ape genome diversity provides a framework for understanding evolution and a resource for more effective management of wild and captive great ape populations.
807 citations
Authors
Showing all 62 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mads F. Bertelsen | 35 | 247 | 7284 |
| Anders Miki Bojesen | 28 | 124 | 2449 |
| Christina Hvilsom | 14 | 28 | 1734 |
| Carsten Grøndahl | 12 | 28 | 383 |
| Ida Bærholm Schnell | 11 | 12 | 1247 |
| Kristin Leus | 9 | 19 | 2636 |
| Augusto S. Abe | 8 | 22 | 176 |
| Catherine J.A. Williams | 8 | 15 | 130 |
| Mikkel Stelvig | 7 | 16 | 162 |
| Cathrine Sauer | 6 | 9 | 142 |
| Carl Traeholt | 6 | 15 | 280 |
| Mie Johanne Hansen | 6 | 11 | 72 |
| Peter Frandsen | 6 | 12 | 547 |
| Christina Lehmkuhl Noer | 5 | 10 | 307 |
| David Magintan | 5 | 13 | 399 |