scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Coventry University

EducationCoventry, United Kingdom
About: Coventry University is a education organization based out in Coventry, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Higher education. The organization has 4964 authors who have published 12700 publications receiving 255898 citations. The organization is also known as: Lanchester Polytechnic & Coventry Polytechnic.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, evidence for lake-level changes derived from stratigraphic sequences in cores from littoral zones is reviewed in the context of lake sedimentation processes and possible approaches for choosing optimum sites are examined.
Abstract: Evidence for lake-level changes derived from stratigraphic sequences in cores from littoral zones is reviewed in the context of lake sedimentation processes. These are illustrated with published case-studies which have used multiple-core data. Possible approaches for choosing optimum sites are examined. Sedimentation controls which may change over time are also considered; these include, wind strength and frequency, wind exposure, water depth and underwater slopes, sediment type and littoral vegetation. A final section discusses how lake-level studies can be optimised so that results can be used with confidence in paleoclimatic and paleohydrological reconstructions. Sedimentary data showing shifts in littoral vegetation along shallow underwater gradients in sheltered margins, and transitions between sediment compositions linked to specific hydrological conditions give the strongest lines of evidence.

139 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the association between value co-creation and the willingness to engage in customer citizenship behavior in the hospitality and tourism context and investigate the causal relationship between the dimensions of value cocreation (co-production and value-in-use) and customer citizenship behaviour.

138 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Li et al. as discussed by the authors analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution of the global plastic waste trade networks and evaluated the direct and indirect impacts of China's plastic waste import ban on the GPWTNs.
Abstract: Millions of tonnes (teragrams) of plastic waste are traded around the world every year, which plays an important role in partially substituting virgin plastics as a source of raw materials in plastic product manufacturing. In this paper, global plastic waste trade networks (GPWTNs) from 1988 to 2017 are established using the UN-Comtrade database. The spatiotemporal evolution of the GPWTNs is analyzed. Attention is given to the country ranks, inter- and intra-continental trade flows, and geo-visual communities in the GPWTNs. We also evaluate the direct and indirect impacts of China’s plastic waste import ban on the GPWTNs. The results show that the GPWTNs have small-world and scale-free properties and a core-periphery structure. The geography of the plastic waste trade is structured by Asia as the dominant importer and North America and Europe as the largest sources of plastic waste. China is the unrivaled colossus in the global plastic waste trade. After China’s import ban, the plastic waste trade flows have been largely redirected to Southeast Asian countries. Compared with import countries, export countries are more important for the robustness of GPWTNs. Clearly, developed countries will not announce bans on plastic waste exports; these countries have strong motivation to continue to shift plastic waste to poorer countries. However, the import bans from developing countries will compel developed countries to build new disposal facilities and deal with their plastic waste domestically.

138 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The toolkit comprises two key components, namely, a series of indicators comprising both generic and topic area-specific indicators that measure sustainability performance and a list of characteristics that describe four future scenarios that enable the use of scenarios in any urban context and at any scale relevant to that context.
Abstract: Scenarios are a useful tool to help think about and visualise the future and, as such, are utilised by many policymakers and practitioners Future scenarios have not been used to explore the urban context in much depth, yet have the potential to provide valuable insights into the robustness of decisions being made today in the name of sustainability As part of a major research project entitled Urban Futures, a toolkit has been developed in the UK to facilitate the use of scenarios in any urban context and at any scale relevant to that context The toolkit comprises two key components, namely, (i) a series of indicators comprising both generic and topic area-specific indicators (eg, air quality, biodiversity, density, water) that measure sustainability performance and (ii) a list of characteristics (ie, 1–2-sentence statements about a feature, issue or small set of issues) that describe four future scenarios In combination, these two components enable us to measure the performance of any given sustainability indicator, and establish the relative sensitivity or vulnerability of that indicator to the different future scenarios An important aspect of the methodology underpinning the toolkit is that it is flexible enough to incorporate new scenarios, characteristics and indicators, thereby allowing the long-term performance of our urban environments to be considered in the broadest possible sense

138 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors assess the expectations of stakeholders on how BIM could be employed for construction and demolition waste (CDW) management, and identify five major groups of BIM expectations for CDW management, which are: (i) BIM-based collaboration for waste management, (ii) waste-driven design process and solutions, (iii) waste analysis throughout building lifecycle, innovative technologies for waste intelligence and analytics, and (v) improved documentation.

138 citations


Authors

Showing all 5097 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Xiang Zhang1541733117576
Zidong Wang12291450717
Stephen Joseph9548545357
Andrew Smith87102534127
John F. Allen7940123214
Craig E. Banks7756927520
Philip L. Smith7529124842
Tim H. Sparks6931519997
Nadine E. Foster6832018475
Michael G. Burton6651916736
Sarah E Lamb6539528825
Michael Gleeson6523417603
David Alexander6552016504
Timothy J. Mason6522515810
David S.G. Thomas6322814796
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Sheffield
102.9K papers, 3.9M citations

93% related

University of Exeter
50.6K papers, 1.7M citations

92% related

RMIT University
82.9K papers, 1.7M citations

92% related

University of York
56.9K papers, 2.4M citations

92% related

Lancaster University
44.5K papers, 1.6M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202360
2022217
20211,419
20201,267
20191,097
20181,013