Institution
Dalhousie University
Education•Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada•
About: Dalhousie University is a education organization based out in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 25660 authors who have published 58465 publications receiving 2082403 citations. The organization is also known as: Dalhousie College & The Governors of Dalhousie College and University.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust1, University College London2, King's College London3, University of Melbourne4, University of Exeter5, Brighton and Sussex Medical School6, University of Manchester7, Tel Aviv University8, Johns Hopkins University9, University of Michigan10, Kaiser Permanente11, University of Washington12, University of Montpellier13, University of Edinburgh14, Dalhousie University15, University of Southern California16, Innlandet Hospital Trust17, University of Oslo18
TL;DR: The Lancet Commission on Dementia Prevention, Intervention, and Care met to consolidate the huge strides that have been made and the emerging knowledge as to what the authors should do to prevent and manage dementia.
3,826 citations
Mariachiara Di Cesare1, Mariachiara Di Cesare2, James Bentham1, Gretchen A Stevens3 +738 more•Institutions (60)
TL;DR: The posterior probability of meeting the target of halting by 2025 the rise in obesity at its 2010 levels, if post-2000 trends continue, is calculated.
3,766 citations
Dalhousie University1, University of Wyoming2, Plymouth Marine Laboratory3, Stockholm University4, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences5, University of California, Santa Barbara6, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute7, Scripps Institution of Oceanography8, Stanford University9, University of California, Davis10, University of British Columbia11
TL;DR: The authors analyzed local experiments, long-term regional time series, and global fisheries data to test how biodiversity loss affects marine ecosystem services across temporal and spatial scales, concluding that marine biodiversity loss is increasingly impairing the ocean's capacity to provide food, maintain water quality, and recover from perturbations.
Abstract: Human-dominated marine ecosystems are experiencing accelerating loss of populations and species, with largely unknown consequences. We analyzed local experiments, long-term regional time series, and global fisheries data to test how biodiversity loss affects marine ecosystem services across temporal and spatial scales. Overall, rates of resource collapse increased and recovery potential, stability, and water quality decreased exponentially with declining diversity. Restoration of biodiversity, in contrast, increased productivity fourfold and decreased variability by 21%, on average. We conclude that marine biodiversity loss is increasingly impairing the ocean's capacity to provide food, maintain water quality, and recover from perturbations. Yet available data suggest that at this point, these trends are still reversible.
3,672 citations
TL;DR: These examinations in CHS permit evaluation of CVD risk factors in older adults, particularly in groups previously under-represented in epidemiologic studies, such as women and the very old.
3,631 citations
Johns Hopkins University1, University of Alabama at Birmingham2, University of Birmingham3, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation4, Laval University5, University of Manchester6, University College London7, University of California, Los Angeles8, Lund University9, Northwestern University10, Hanyang University11, Dalhousie University12, University of Toronto13, McGill University14, North Shore-LIJ Health System15, Allegheny General Hospital16, University of California, San Diego17, University of Pennsylvania18, Monklands Hospital19, University of the Basque Country20, St Thomas' Hospital21, University of Copenhagen22, New York University23, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill24, Karolinska Institutet25, SUNY Downstate Medical Center26, University of Manitoba27, Wake Forest University28, University of Louisville29, Emory University30, Istanbul University31, Medical University of South Carolina32, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio33, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center34, University of Maryland, Baltimore35
TL;DR: The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) group revised and validated the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria in order to improve clinical relevance, meet stringent methodology requirements, and incorporate new knowledge regarding the immunology of SLE.
Abstract: Objective The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) group revised and validated the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria in order to improve clinical relevance, meet stringent methodology requirements, and incorporate new knowledge regarding the immunology of SLE. Methods The classification criteria were derived from a set of 702 expert-rated patient scenarios. Recursive partitioning was used to derive an initial rule that was simplified and refined based on SLICC physician consensus. The SLICC group validated the classification criteria in a new validation sample of 690 new expert-rated patient scenarios. Results Seventeen criteria were identified. In the derivation set, the SLICC classification criteria resulted in fewer misclassifications compared with the current ACR classification criteria (49 versus 70; P = 0.0082) and had greater sensitivity (94% versus 86%; P < 0.0001) and equal specificity (92% versus 93%; P = 0.39). In the validation set, the SLICC classification criteria resulted in fewer misclassifications compared with the current ACR classification criteria (62 versus 74; P = 0.24) and had greater sensitivity (97% versus 83%; P < 0.0001) but lower specificity (84% versus 96%; P < 0.0001). Conclusion The new SLICC classification criteria performed well in a large set of patient scenarios rated by experts. According to the SLICC rule for the classification of SLE, the patient must satisfy at least 4 criteria, including at least one clinical criterion and one immunologic criterion OR the patient must have biopsy-proven lupus nephritis in the presence of antinuclear antibodies or antidouble-stranded DNA antibodies. (Less)
3,609 citations
Authors
Showing all 25969 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salim Yusuf | 231 | 1439 | 252912 |
| Gordon H. Guyatt | 231 | 1620 | 228631 |
| Michael Rutter | 188 | 676 | 151592 |
| Mark E. Cooper | 158 | 1463 | 124887 |
| Roberto Romero | 151 | 1516 | 108321 |
| Rui Zhang | 151 | 2625 | 107917 |
| Thomas J. Smith | 140 | 1775 | 113919 |
| Dafna D. Gladman | 129 | 1036 | 75273 |
| Marcello Tonelli | 128 | 701 | 115576 |
| Shi Xue Dou | 122 | 2028 | 74031 |
| J. R. Dahn | 120 | 832 | 66025 |
| Scott Chapman | 118 | 579 | 46199 |
| Kerry S. Courneya | 112 | 608 | 49504 |
| Robert C. Haddon | 112 | 577 | 52712 |
| Rodney J. Bartlett | 109 | 700 | 56154 |