scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

DePaul University

EducationChicago, Illinois, United States
About: DePaul University is a education organization based out in Chicago, Illinois, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 5658 authors who have published 11562 publications receiving 295257 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggest that experienced nurses used a conceptual language to reason about assessment findings and used heuristics to reason more quickly and efficiently.
Abstract: As an essential component of nursing practice, clinical reasoning is used to assimilate information, analyze data, and make decisions regarding patient care. Little is known about the reasoning strategies of experienced nurses who are not yet experts. This qualitative descriptive study explored the cognitive strategies used by experienced nurses as they considered assessment findings of assigned patients. To date, few studies of nurses' clinical reasoning have been conducted in a practice setting during actual patient care. A small group research design was employed using the think-aloud (TA) method with protocol analysis. A total of 15 experienced nurses were asked to "think aloud" about patient assessment findings. Data were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using the three steps of protocol analysis. The results suggest that experienced nurses used a conceptual language to reason about assessment findings and used heuristics to reason more quickly and efficiently.

171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
A Krivine1, L. Cao1, P Lebon1, C. Francoual1, G Firtion, R. Henrion 
TL;DR: The inability to detect HIV-1 infection at birth in almost 70% of babies subsequently found infected suggests an active replication of HIV during the first weeks of life, which might favour the hypothesis that transmission of HIV- 1 takes place either at the end of pregnancy or at delivery.

171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggest that fault prediction models based upon traditional metrics can substitute for specialized vulnerability prediction models, however, both fault prediction andulnerability prediction models require significant improvement to reduce false positives while providing high recall.
Abstract: Finding security vulnerabilities requires a different mindset than finding general faults in software—thinking like an attacker. Therefore, security engineers looking to prioritize security inspection and testing efforts may be better served by a prediction model that indicates security vulnerabilities rather than faults. At the same time, faults and vulnerabilities have commonalities that may allow development teams to use traditional fault prediction models and metrics for vulnerability prediction. The goal of our study is to determine whether fault prediction models can be used for vulnerability prediction or if specialized vulnerability prediction models should be developed when both models are built with traditional metrics of complexity, code churn, and fault history. We have performed an empirical study on a widely-used, large open source project, the Mozilla Firefox web browser, where 21% of the source code files have faults and only 3% of the files have vulnerabilities. Both the fault prediction model and the vulnerability prediction model provide similar ability in vulnerability prediction across a wide range of classification thresholds. For example, the fault prediction model provided recall of 83% and precision of 11% at classification threshold 0.6 and the vulnerability prediction model provided recall of 83% and precision of 12% at classification threshold 0.5. Our results suggest that fault prediction models based upon traditional metrics can substitute for specialized vulnerability prediction models. However, both fault prediction and vulnerability prediction models require significant improvement to reduce false positives while providing high recall.

171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This study tested the self-efficacy-performance model found in Bandura's social-cognitive theory in a work setting, with a sample of 776 American university employees, and with discriminant function analyses, and indicated that performance with computers significantly predicted perceptions of high and low self-efficiency.
Abstract: Past empirical research examining the relationship of self-efficacy perceptions and performance has had several limitations. Most studies were performed in the laboratory with tasks not directly related to individual work performance. As a consequence, many findings are not generalizable to individual work performance. This study tested the self-efficacy-performance model found in Bandura's social-cognitive theory in a work setting, with a sample of 776 American university employees, and with discriminant function analyses. Respondents indicated that performance with computers significantly predicted perceptions of high and low self-efficacy. Results provide additional support for social-cognitive theory as outlined by Bandura.

171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared 17 abused and 17 matched, non-abused children on their ability to identify six facial expressions of emotions and on teacher ratings of social competency.
Abstract: This study compared 17 abused and 17 matched, nonabused children on their ability to identify six facial expressions of emotions and on teacher ratings of social competency. Abused children were less skilled in decoding facial expressions of emotions and were rated less socially competent than nonabused children. The findings suggest a strategy for studying the development of emotion recognition skills by abused and nonabused children.

170 citations


Authors

Showing all 5724 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
C. N. R. Rao133164686718
Mark T. Greenberg10752949878
Stanford T. Shulman8550234248
Paul Erdös8564034773
T. M. Crawford8527023805
Michael H. Dickinson7919623094
Hanan Samet7536925388
Stevan E. Hobfoll7427135870
Elias M. Stein6918944787
Julie A. Mennella6817813215
Raouf Boutaba6751923936
Paul C. Kuo6438913445
Gary L. Miller6330613010
Bamshad Mobasher6324318867
Gail McKoon6212514952
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Florida International University
31.1K papers, 934.2K citations

85% related

City University of New York
56.5K papers, 1.7M citations

84% related

George Mason University
39.9K papers, 1.3M citations

83% related

San Diego State University
27.9K papers, 1.1M citations

83% related

Georgia State University
35.8K papers, 1.1M citations

83% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202326
2022100
2021518
2020498
2019452
2018463