Eli Lilly and Company

About: Eli Lilly and Company is a company organization based out in Indianapolis, Indiana, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Receptor. The organization has 17826 authors who have published 22835 publications receiving 946714 citations. The organization is also known as: Eli Lily.

Dual CD19 and CD123 targeting prevents antigen-loss relapses after CD19-directed immunotherapies

Abstract: Potent CD19-directed immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) and blinatumomab, have drastically changed the outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, CD19-negative relapses have emerged as a major problem that is observed in approximately 30% of treated patients. Developing approaches to preventing and treating antigen-loss escapes would therefore represent a vertical advance in the field. Here, we found that in primary patient samples, the IL-3 receptor α chain CD123 was highly expressed on leukemia-initiating cells and CD19-negative blasts in bulk B-ALL at baseline and at relapse after CART19 administration. Using intravital imaging in an antigen-loss CD19-negative relapse xenograft model, we determined that CART123, but not CART19, recognized leukemic blasts, established protracted synapses, and eradicated CD19-negative leukemia, leading to prolonged survival. Furthermore, combining CART19 and CART123 prevented antigen-loss relapses in xenograft models. Finally, we devised a dual CAR-expressing construct that combined CD19- and CD123-mediated T cell activation and demonstrated that it provides superior in vivo activity against B-ALL compared with single-expressing CART or pooled combination CART. In conclusion, these findings indicate that targeting CD19 and CD123 on leukemic blasts represents an effective strategy for treating and preventing antigen-loss relapses occurring after CD19-directed therapies.

A Comparison of Lipid and Glycemic Effects of Pioglitazone and Rosiglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Dyslipidemia: Response to Bell and Brunzell

Abstract: In his commentary, Bell (1) presents specific criticisms of the head-to-head trial comparing the effects of rosiglitazone with pioglitazone on lipids and lipoproteins. Bell raises a concern over study recruitment (in particular the high rate of screen failures), the exclusion of patients on statin therapy, and the limited data supporting the role of hypertriglyceridemia in cardiovascular risk. By excluding patients on other glucose- and lipid-lowering medication, we were able to demonstrate that the two agents have different effects on each of the components of the lipid profile. In doing so, the differences observed could only be attributed to the active thiazolidinedione (TZD) therapy. Targets for LDL cholesterol were lowered during the active …

Epidermal growth factor receptor blockade with C225 plus gemcitabine results in regression of human pancreatic carcinoma growing orthotopically in nude mice by antiangiogenic mechanisms.

Abstract: Both epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) signaling mechanisms and angiogenesis have been evaluated as independent targets for therapy of human pancreatic carcinoma, but a link between the two processes has been identified only recently. This study evaluated whether EGF-R blockade therapy with anti-EGF-R antibody C225 inhibits pancreatic carcinoma growth and metastasis in an orthotopic nude mouse model via tumor-mediated angiogenesis and whether gemcitabine potentiates this effect. In vitro treatment of human pancreatic carcinoma L3.6pl cells with C225 inhibited EGF-R autophosphorylation, producing a maximum of 20% cytostasis. Treatment with C225 plus gemcitabine resulted in additive cytotoxic effects that increased with increasing gemcitabine concentrations. Dose-dependent decreases in expression of the angiogenic factors vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin 8 (but not basic fibroblast growth factor) were observed in the C225-treated cells (mRNA and protein levels). In L3.6pl tumors established in the pancreas of nude mice, systemic therapy with C225 alone and C225 in combination with gemcitabine resulted in growth inhibition, tumor regression, and abrogation of metastasis; median tumor volume was reduced from 538 to 0.3 and to 0 mm3, respectively. Gemcitabine treatment alone reduced median tumor volume from 538 to 152 mm3. Liver metastases were present in 50% of the controls, 30% of the gemcitabine-treated animals, and 20% of C225-treated animals. No macroscopically visible liver metastases were observed in the combination treatment group. As early as 11 days after C225 treatment, the median percentage of proliferating cell nuclear antigen-positive cells was substantially reduced compared with gemcitabine treatment alone (26% versus 73%, respectively) versus controls (92%), correlating with in vivo blockade of EGF-R activation. Similarly after 11 days treatment, production of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin 8 was significantly lower in C225 and C225 plus gemcitabine-treated tumors versus gemcitabine-treated and control tumors. Significant differences in microvessel density were observed 18 days after C225 or combination treatments (but not gemcitabine alone) in direct correlation with the difference in percentage of apoptotic endothelial cells, as visualized by double immunofluorescence microscopy. These experiments indicate that therapeutic strategies targeting EGF-R have a significant antitumor effect on human L3.6pl pancreatic carcinoma growing in nude mice which is mediated in part by inhibition of tumor-induced angiogenesis, leading to tumor cell apoptosis and regression. Furthermore, this effect is potentiated in combination with gemcitabine.

Career-Related Antecedents and Outcomes of Job Rotation

Abstract: Drawing on related literature and an inductive pilot study, we propose a conceptual framework for the relationship between job rotation and selected career-related variables. A test on 255 employee...

Differential effects of teriparatide on BMD after treatment with raloxifene or alendronate.

Abstract: We investigated the effects of 18 months of treatment with teriparatide in patients previously treated with long-term antiresorptive therapy using bone turnover markers and bone densitometry. Previous raloxifene treatment allowed for teriparatide-induced early bone marker and BMD increases comparable with previously published results for treatment-naive patients. Conversely, previous alendronate treatment reduced the bone marker and BMD response. Introduction: Teriparatide [rhPTH(1–34)] has been shown to increase BMD and reduce the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Our objective was to investigate the skeletal effects of 18 months of treatment with teriparatide in women whose osteoporosis was previously treated with either alendronate or raloxifene. Materials and Methods: Daily subcutaneous injections of 20 μg teriparatide were administered for 18 months to 59 postmenopausal women, 60–87 years of age, with BMD T-scores ≤ −2.0 who had previously received either alendronate (ALN) or raloxifene (RLX) therapy for 18–36 months. All patients received daily calcium (1000 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU) supplementation. The primary study outcome was change in lumbar spine BMD measured by DXA. Secondary outcomes included changes in bone turnover markers, total hip BMD, and safety. Results: Median baseline bone turnover marker levels in prior ALN patients were about one-half those of prior RLX patients. During teriparatide treatment, bone markers in prior ALN patients increased later and peaked at about one-third lower levels compared with prior RLX patients. During the first 6 months, there were statistically significant (p < 0.05) group differences in BMD change at the hip (prior ALN −1.8% versus prior RLX +0.5%) and at the spine (prior ALN +0.5% versus prior RLX +5.2%). The positive slopes in hip and lumbar spine BMD were similar in both groups between 6 and 18 months. After 18 months, mean lumbar spine BMD increased 10.2% in prior RLX compared with 4.1% in prior ALN (p < 0.05) patients. Furthermore, at 18 months, mean total hip BMD had significantly increased (1.8%, p < 0.05) in prior RLX patients but was not different from baseline in prior ALN patients. Conclusions: Teriparatide treatment stimulates bone turnover in patients pretreated with both RLX and ALN. Prior treatment with RLX allows for the expected teriparatide-induced BMD increases comparable with those previously reported for treatment-naive patients. In contrast, prior treatment with ALN prevents increases in BMD, particularly in the first 6 months.