Institution
Company•Tel Aviv, Israel•
About: Facebook is a company organization based out in Tel Aviv, Israel. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Artificial neural network & Language model. The organization has 7856 authors who have published 10906 publications receiving 570123 citations. The organization is also known as: facebook.com & FB.
Topics: Artificial neural network, Language model, Reinforcement learning, Machine translation, Social network
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
15 Jun 2019TL;DR: A novel model architecture is introduced that reads text in the image, reasons about it in the context of the image and the question, and predicts an answer which might be a deduction based on the text and the image or composed of the strings found in the images.
Abstract: Studies have shown that a dominant class of questions asked by visually impaired users on images of their surroundings involves reading text in the image. But today’s VQA models can not read! Our paper takes a first step towards addressing this problem. First, we introduce a new “TextVQA” dataset to facilitate progress on this important problem. Existing datasets either have a small proportion of questions about text (e.g., the VQA dataset) or are too small (e.g., the VizWiz dataset). TextVQA contains 45,336 questions on 28,408 images that require reasoning about text to answer. Second, we introduce a novel model architecture that reads text in the image, reasons about it in the context of the image and the question, and predicts an answer which might be a deduction based on the text and the image or composed of the strings found in the image. Consequently, we call our approach Look, Read, Reason & Answer (LoRRA). We show that LoRRA outperforms existing state-of-the-art VQA models on our TextVQA dataset. We find that the gap between human performance and machine performance is significantly larger on TextVQA than on VQA 2.0, suggesting that TextVQA is well-suited to benchmark progress along directions complementary to VQA 2.0.
363 citations
••
07 Aug 2017TL;DR: The system, called SilkRoad, is defined in a 400 line P4 program and when compiled to a state-of-the-art switching ASIC, it can load-balance ten million connections simultaneously at line rate.
Abstract: In this paper, we show that up to hundreds of software load balancer (SLB) servers can be replaced by a single modern switching ASIC, potentially reducing the cost of load balancing by over two orders of magnitude. Today, large data centers typically employ hundreds or thousands of servers to load-balance incoming traffic over application servers. These software load balancers (SLBs) map packets destined to a service (with a virtual IP address, or VIP), to a pool of servers tasked with providing the service (with multiple direct IP addresses, or DIPs). An SLB is stateful, it must always map a connection to the same server, even if the pool of servers changes and/or if the load is spread differently across the pool. This property is called per-connection consistency or PCC. The challenge is that the load balancer must keep track of millions of connections simultaneously.Until recently, it was not possible to implement a load balancer with PCC in a merchant switching ASIC, because high-performance switching ASICs typically can not maintain per-connection states with PCC. Newer switching ASICs provide resources and primitives to enable PCC at a large scale. In this paper, we explore how to use switching ASICs to build much faster load balancers than have been built before. Our system, called SilkRoad, is defined in a 400 line P4 program and when compiled to a state-of-the-art switching ASIC, we show it can load-balance ten million connections simultaneously at line rate.
362 citations
•
30 Apr 2020TL;DR: It is shown that the likelihood objective itself is at fault, resulting in a model that assigns too much probability to sequences containing repeats and frequent words, unlike those from the human training distribution, thus providing a strong alternative to existing techniques.
Abstract: Neural text generation is a key tool in natural language applications, but it is well known there are major problems at its core. In particular, standard likelihood training and decoding leads to dull and repetitive outputs. While some post-hoc fixes have been proposed, in particular top-k and nucleus sampling, they do not address the fact that the token-level probabilities predicted by the model are poor. In this paper we show that the likelihood objective itself is at fault, resulting in a model that assigns too much probability to sequences containing repeats and frequent words, unlike those from the human training distribution. We propose a new objective, unlikelihood training, which forces unlikely generations to be assigned lower probability by the model. We show that both token and sequence level unlikelihood training give less repetitive, less dull text while maintaining perplexity, giving superior generations using standard greedy or beam search. According to human evaluations, our approach with standard beam search also outperforms the currently popular decoding methods of nucleus sampling or beam blocking, thus providing a strong alternative to existing techniques.
357 citations
•
02 Sep 2020
TL;DR: The authors use reinforcement learning to fine-tune a summarization policy according to human feedback, which results in better summaries than optimizing ROUGE according to humans, and transfer to CNN/DM news articles, producing summaries nearly as good as the human reference.
Abstract: As language models become more powerful, training and evaluation are increasingly bottlenecked by the data and metrics used for a particular task. For example, summarization models are often trained to predict human reference summaries and evaluated using ROUGE, but both of these metrics are rough proxies for what we really care about---summary quality. In this work, we show that it is possible to significantly improve summary quality by training a model to optimize for human preferences. We collect a large, high-quality dataset of human comparisons between summaries, train a model to predict the human-preferred summary, and use that model as a reward function to fine-tune a summarization policy using reinforcement learning. We apply our method to a version of the TL;DR dataset of Reddit posts and find that our models significantly outperform both human reference summaries and much larger models fine-tuned with supervised learning alone. Our models also transfer to CNN/DM news articles, producing summaries nearly as good as the human reference without any news-specific fine-tuning. We conduct extensive analyses to understand our human feedback dataset and fine-tuned models We establish that our reward model generalizes to new datasets, and that optimizing our reward model results in better summaries than optimizing ROUGE according to humans. We hope the evidence from our paper motivates machine learning researchers to pay closer attention to how their training loss affects the model behavior they actually want.
357 citations
••
01 Jun 2015TL;DR: The 2015 iteration of the SemEval shared task on Sentiment Analysis in Twitter was the most popular sentiment analysis shared task to date with more than 40 teams participating in each of the last three years.
Abstract: In this paper, we describe the 2015 iteration of the SemEval shared task on Sentiment Analysis in Twitter. This was the most popular sentiment analysis shared task to date with more than 40 teams participating in each of the last three years. This year’s shared task competition consisted of five sentiment prediction subtasks. Two were reruns from previous years: (A) sentiment expressed by a phrase in the context of a tweet, and (B) overall sentiment of a tweet. We further included three new subtasks asking to predict (C) the sentiment towards a topic in a single tweet, (D) the overall sentiment towards a topic in a set of tweets, and (E) the degree of prior polarity of a phrase.
356 citations
Authors
Showing all 7875 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Yoshua Bengio | 202 | 1033 | 420313 |
Xiang Zhang | 154 | 1733 | 117576 |
Jitendra Malik | 151 | 493 | 165087 |
Trevor Darrell | 148 | 678 | 181113 |
Christopher D. Manning | 138 | 499 | 147595 |
Robert W. Heath | 128 | 1049 | 73171 |
Pieter Abbeel | 126 | 589 | 70911 |
Yann LeCun | 121 | 369 | 171211 |
Li Fei-Fei | 120 | 420 | 145574 |
Jon Kleinberg | 117 | 444 | 87865 |
Sergey Levine | 115 | 652 | 59769 |
Richard Szeliski | 113 | 359 | 72019 |
Sanjeev Kumar | 113 | 1325 | 54386 |
Bruce Neal | 108 | 561 | 87213 |
Larry S. Davis | 107 | 693 | 49714 |