scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

OtherBoston, Massachusetts, United States
About: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston is a other organization based out in Boston, Massachusetts, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Monetary policy & Payment. The organization has 184 authors who have published 878 publications receiving 36686 citations. The organization is also known as: Boston Fed.


Papers
More filters
Posted ContentDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined image motivation as a driver in prosocial behavior and asked whether extrinsic monetary incentives (do well) have a detrimental effect on prosocial behaviour due to crowding out of image motivation.
Abstract: This paper examines image motivation - the desire to be liked and well-regarded by others - as a driver in prosocial behavior (doing good), and asks whether extrinsic monetary incentives (doing well) have a detrimental effect on prosocial behavior due to crowding out of image motivation.By definition, image depends on one's behavior being visible to other people. Using this unique property we show that image is indeed an important part of the motivation to behave prosocially. Moreover, we show that extrinsic incentives interact with image motivation and are therefore less effective in public than in private. Together, these results imply that image motivation is crowded out by monetary incentives; this means that monetary incentives are more likely to be counterproductive for public prosocial activities than for private ones.

1,319 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper explored a monetary policy model with habit formation for consumers, in which consumers' utility depends in part on current consumption relative to past consumption, and found that the responses of both spending and inflation to monetary policy actions are signicantly improved by this modication (JEL D12, E52, E43).
Abstract: This paper explores a monetary policy model with habit formation for consumers, in which consumers’ utility depends in part on current consumption relative to past consumption The empirical tests developed in the paper show that one can reject the hypothesis of no habit formation with tremendous condence, largely because the habit formation model captures the gradual hump-shaped response of real spending to various shocks The paper then embeds the habit consumption specication in a monetary policy model and nds that the responses of both spending and inflation to monetary policy actions are signicantly improved by this modication (JEL D12, E52, E43)

1,255 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the Japanese banking crisis provides a natural experiment to test whether a loan supply shock can affect real economic activity, and they exploit the variation across geographically distinct commercial real estate markets to establish conclusively that loan supply shocks emanating from Japan had real effects on economic activity in the United States.
Abstract: The Japanese banking crisis provides a natural experiment to test whether a loan supply shock can affect real economic activity. Because the shock was external to U.S. credit markets, yet connected through the Japanese bank penetration of U.S. markets, this event allows us to identify an exogenous loan supply shock and ultimately link that shock to construction activity in U.S. commercial real estate markets. We exploit the variation across geographically distinct commercial real estate markets to establish conclusively that loan supply shocks emanating from Japan had real effects on economic activity in the United States. (JEL E44, F36)

1,150 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Munnell et al. as mentioned in this paper argued that much of the decline in U.S. productivity that occurred in the 1970s was precipitated by declining rates of public capital investment.
Abstract: In the late 1980s, David Aschauer (1989) triggered a long overdue dialogue among economists and political leaders when he published a study arguing that much of the decline in U.S. productivity that occurred in the 1970s was precipitated by declining rates of public capital investment. My own work confirmed these results (Munnell, 1990a). Spending advocates seized on these findings as support for increased public investment. The enthusiasm among policymakers for the early Aschauer results was matched, if not surpassed, by skepticism on the part of many economists. Critics of these studies charged that the methodology was flawed, that the direction of causation between public investment and output growth is unclear and that, even if the historical empirical relationships were estimated correctly, they provide no clear indications for current policy. Who's right? What do we know and not know about the link between public infrastructure and productivity? And what are the implications of these results for policy?

836 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors found that binding risk-based capital requirements associated with the decline in the Japanese stock market resulted in a decline in commercial lending by Japanese banks in the United States that was both economically and statistically significant.
Abstract: The large size of Japanese bank lending operations in the United States enables us to use U.S. banking data to investigate the extent to which the sharp decline in Japanese stock prices was transmitted to the United States via U.S. branches of Japanese parent banks, as well as to identify a supply shock to U.S. bank lending that is independent of U.S. loan demand. We find that binding risk-based capital requirements associated with the decline in the Japanese stock market resulted in a decline in commercial lending by Japanese banks in the United States that was both economically and statistically significant.

800 citations


Authors

Showing all 189 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Stephan Meier5012113598
Christopher J. Mayer4310311017
Eric S. Rosengren411919530
Paul S. Willen401215198
Alicia H. Munnell404529337
Lorenz Goette381016677
Joe Peek381208188
Mark Aguiar37889756
Jeffrey C. Fuhrer361076712
Karl E. Case349710719
Scott Schuh331177352
Oz Shy311825150
Fabio Ghironi311004125
Andreas Fuster26722391
Joanna Stavins25852385
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Federal Reserve System
10.3K papers, 511.9K citations

90% related

National Bureau of Economic Research
34.1K papers, 2.8M citations

89% related

Center for Economic and Policy Research
4.4K papers, 272K citations

89% related

Federal Reserve Bank of New York
2.6K papers, 156.1K citations

89% related

European Central Bank
4.7K papers, 231.8K citations

88% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20227
202120
202035
201928
201834
201743