Institution
Federal Reserve System
Other•Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States•
About: Federal Reserve System is a other organization based out in Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Monetary policy & Inflation. The organization has 2373 authors who have published 10301 publications receiving 511979 citations.
Topics: Monetary policy, Inflation, Interest rate, Market liquidity, Debt
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The authors infers age-productivity profiles using data on the present expected value of earnings of new hires of a Fortune 1000 firm, with productivity exceeding earnings for young workers and vice versa for older workers.
Abstract: In hiring new workers, risk-neutral employers equate the present expected
value of each worker's compensation to the present expected value of his/her
productivity, Data detailing how present expected compensation varies with
the age of hire embed, therefore, information about how productivity varies
with age. This paper infers age-productivity profiles using data on the
present expected value of earnings of new hires of a Fortune 1000 firm. For
each of the five occupation/sex groups considered, productivity falls with
age, with productivity exceeding earnings for young workers and vice versa for
older workers.
164 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors study the impact of regional and sectoral productivity changes on the U.S. economy, and highlight the role of these elasticities by tracing out the eects of productivity gains in California in the Computers and Electronics industry between 2002 and 2007 on all other states and regions.
Abstract: We study the impact of regional and sectoral productivity changes on the U.S. economy. To that end, we consider an environment that captures the eects of interregional and intersectoral trade in propagating disaggregated productivity changes at the level of a sector in a given U.S. state to the rest of the economy. The quantitative model we develop features pairwise interregional trade across all 50 U.S. states, 26 traded and non-traded industries, labor as a mobile factor, and structures and land as an immobile factor. We allow for sectoral linkages in the form of an intermediate input structure that matches the U.S. input-output matrix. Using data on trade ‡ows by industry between states, as well as other regional and industry data, we obtain the aggregate, regional and sectoral elasticities of measured TFP, GDP, and employment to regional and sectoral productivity changes. We …nd that such elasticities can vary signi…cantly depending on the sectors and regions aected and are importantly determined by the spatial structure of the US economy. We highlight the role of these elasticities by tracing out the eects of productivity gains in California in the Computers and Electronics industry between 2002 and 2007 on all other U.S. sectors and regions.
164 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors reconcile the divergent top share estimates, showing how the choices of data sets and methodological decisions affect levels and trends, and their preferred estimates for both wealth and income concentration are lower and have been rising less rapidly in recent years.
Abstract: Most available estimates of U.S. wealth and income concentration indicate that the top shares are high and have been rising in recent decades, but there is some disagreement about specific levels and trends. Household surveys are the traditional data source used to measure the top shares, but recent studies using administrative tax records suggest that these survey-based top share estimates may not be capturing all of the increasing concentration. In this paper, we reconcile the divergent top share estimates, showing how the choices of data sets and methodological decisions affect levels and trends. Relative to the new and most widely cited top share estimates based on administrative tax data alone, our preferred estimates for both wealth and income concentration are lower and have been rising less rapidly in recent years.
164 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors contribute to the debate over the reform of the Basel Accord by developing risk-based capital requirements for mortgage loans held in portfolio by financial intermediaries, employing simulation of both economic variables that affect default incidence and conditional loss probability distributions.
Abstract: We contribute to the debate over the reform of the Basel Accord by developing risk-based capital requirements for mortgage loans held in portfolio by financial intermediaries. Our approach employs simulation of both economic variables that affect default incidence and conditional loss probability distributions. Results indicate that appropriate capital charges for credit risk vary substantially with loan characteristics and portfolio geographic diversification. Hence, rules that offer little risk differentiation, including the current Basel I regime and “standardized” approach proposed in Basel II result in significant divergence between regulatory and economic capital. These results highlight the incentive problems inherent in simplified methods of capital regulation.
164 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the forecast performance of the Federal Reserve staff, five atheoretical reduced-form models, and an estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model, focusing on the late 1990s through 2001, was analyzed.
Abstract: This paper considers the forecast performance of the Federal Reserve staff, five atheoretical reduced-form models, and an estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model, focusing on the late 1990s through 2001. Our analysis finds that the DSGE model and atheoretical models forecast real GDP growth better than the Federal Reserve staff during this period by an economically significant margin; we find smaller differences across each method in the quality of inflation forecasts over this period. These results provide some support to the notion that richly specified DSGE models such the one used in this paper belong in the forecasting toolbox of a central bank. � Rochelle M. Edge (rochelle.m.edge@frb.gov), Michael T. Kiley (michael.t.kiley@frb.gov), and JeanPhilippe Laforte (jean-philippe.laforte@frb.gov) are affiliated with the Macroeconomic and Quantitative Studies Section at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This paper represents ongoing work in the section on developing DGE models that can be useful for policy analysis; nevertheless, any views expressed in this paper remain solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or it staff. All errors are our own.
164 citations
Authors
Showing all 2412 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Ross Levine | 122 | 398 | 108067 |
Francis X. Diebold | 110 | 368 | 74723 |
Kenneth Rogoff | 107 | 390 | 75971 |
Allen N. Berger | 106 | 382 | 65596 |
Frederic S. Mishkin | 100 | 372 | 34898 |
Thomas J. Sargent | 96 | 370 | 39224 |
Ben S. Bernanke | 96 | 446 | 76378 |
Stijn Claessens | 96 | 462 | 42743 |
Andrew K. Rose | 88 | 374 | 42605 |
Martin Eichenbaum | 87 | 234 | 37611 |
Lawrence J. Christiano | 85 | 253 | 37734 |
Jie Yang | 78 | 532 | 20004 |
James P. Smith | 78 | 372 | 23013 |
Glenn D. Rudebusch | 73 | 226 | 22035 |
Edward C. Prescott | 72 | 235 | 55508 |