Institution
Federal University of São Paulo
Education•São Paulo, Brazil•
About: Federal University of São Paulo is a education organization based out in São Paulo, Brazil. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 27971 authors who have published 49365 publications receiving 935536 citations. The organization is also known as: Universidade Federal de São Paulo & Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
University of Oxford1, Federal University of São Paulo2, University of the Witwatersrand3, Stellenbosch University4, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine5, University of Sheffield6, University of London7, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust8, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust9, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust10, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust11, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust12, St George's, University of London13, AstraZeneca14, North Bristol NHS Trust15, University College Hospital16, University of Hull17, Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública18, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte19, Northwest University (China)20, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria21, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School22, Boston Children's Hospital23, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul24, Western General Hospital25, University of Glasgow26, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust27, University of Cambridge28, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust29, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board30
TL;DR: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 has an acceptable safety profile and has been found to be efficacious against symptomatic COVID-19 in this interim analysis of ongoing clinical trials.
3,741 citations
Journal Article•
University of British Columbia1, University of Birmingham2, University of Western Australia3, University of Rochester4, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center5, Federal University of São Paulo6, Capital Medical University7, University of Buenos Aires8, University of Guadalajara9, University of Paris10, University College London11
TL;DR: The second revision of the ILAR Taskforce on Classification of Childhood Arthritis (ILAR-JIA) was presented at the 2001 ILAR Workshop on Rheumatology as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The primary aim of the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) proposals for classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is to delineate, for research purposes, relatively homogeneous, mutually exclusive categories of idiopathic childhood arthritis based on predominant clinical and laboratory features. As part of a continuing review process, the ILAR Taskforce on Classification of Childhood Arthritis met in Edmonton in 2001 to discuss modifications to the proposed JIA classification. Since the publication of the first revision of the original classification 1 , a number of descriptive studies using the new classification have been reported 2-11. The aims of this communication are 2-fold: to outline modifications to the revised classification proposed as a result of the Edmonton meeting, and to correct misconceptions highlighted by the published studies concerning the clinical use of the classification. The Edmonton Revision The changes embodied in the second revision of the classification are as follows: 1. Clarification of the definitions of each category. 2. Improvement in the congruity between inclusion and exclusion criteria. 3. Removal of the requirement that a dermatologist make the diagnosis of psoriasis. 4. Removal of the requirement that there be medical confirmation of HLA-B27 associated disease in a relative. 5. Reduction in the age for criterion " 3 " of enthesitis related arthritis, and exclusion " b " from 8 years to 6 years of age. 6. Improvement in the consistency of the structure. The impracticality of the requirement that a diagnosis of psoriasis be made by a dermatologist was recognized, and this requirement was modified so that the diagnosis of psori-asis could be made by a physician (not necessarily a dermatologist). Similarly, it is no longer required that there be medical confirmation of an HLA-B27 associated disease in a relative as contained in exclusion " c. " It is evident that it is very difficult to obtain a reliable history of psoriasis or an HLA-B27 associated disease in a second-degree relative. Therefore, a history of importance to the application of the criteria is restricted to the patient or a first-degree relative (parents or siblings) only. The study of Murray, et al 8 indicated that the HLA-B27 association is important in boys over the age of 6 years at onset of arthritis, and this age was substituted for 8 years in exclusion " b. " Discrepancies between inclusion and exclusion criteria were resolved, and the exclusions were identified by the letters …
3,201 citations
University of Melbourne1, University of British Columbia2, New York University3, Federal University of São Paulo4, French Institute of Health and Medical Research5, University of California, Los Angeles6, Albert Einstein College of Medicine7, Children's Hospital Los Angeles8, University of Pavia9, Karolinska Institutet10, University of Calgary11, Peking University12, Royal Hospital for Sick Children13, University of Glasgow14
TL;DR: The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Classification of the Epilepsies has been updated to reflect our gain in understanding of the epilepsies and their underlying mechanisms following the major scientific advances that have taken place since the last ratified classification in 1989 as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Classification of the Epilepsies has been updated to reflect our gain in understanding of the epilepsies and their underlying mechanisms following the major scientific advances that have taken place since the last ratified classification in 1989. As a critical tool for the practicing clinician, epilepsy classification must be relevant and dynamic to changes in thinking, yet robust and translatable to all areas of the globe. Its primary purpose is for diagnosis of patients, but it is also critical for epilepsy research, development of antiepileptic therapies, and communication around the world. The new classification originates from a draft document submitted for public comments in 2013, which was revised to incorporate extensive feedback from the international epilepsy community over several rounds of consultation. It presents three levels, starting with seizure type, where it assumes that the patient is having epileptic seizures as defined by the new 2017 ILAE Seizure Classification. After diagnosis of the seizure type, the next step is diagnosis of epilepsy type, including focal epilepsy, generalized epilepsy, combined generalized, and focal epilepsy, and also an unknown epilepsy group. The third level is that of epilepsy syndrome, where a specific syndromic diagnosis can be made. The new classification incorporates etiology along each stage, emphasizing the need to consider etiology at each step of diagnosis, as it often carries significant treatment implications. Etiology is broken into six subgroups, selected because of their potential therapeutic consequences. New terminology is introduced such as developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. The term benign is replaced by the terms self-limited and pharmacoresponsive, to be used where appropriate. It is hoped that this new framework will assist in improving epilepsy care and research in the 21st century.
2,842 citations
University of Pittsburgh1, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation2, University of Washington3, University of British Columbia4, The George Institute for Global Health5, Federal University of São Paulo6, Charité7, University of London8, Seattle Children's9, University of São Paulo10, University of Melbourne11
TL;DR: Despite declining age-standardised incidence and mortality, sepsis remains a major cause of health loss worldwide and has an especially high health-related burden in sub-Saharan Africa.
2,419 citations
St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1, New York University2, McMaster University3, Brown University4, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart5, Autonomous University of Barcelona6, University of Manitoba7, Emory University8, Hebrew University of Jerusalem9, University of Toronto10, University of Pittsburgh11, St Thomas' Hospital12, University College London13, Vanderbilt University14, Keio University15, Memorial Hospital of South Bend16, Rowan University17, University of Mississippi18, Rush University Medical Center19, University of Ulsan20, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul21, Federal University of São Paulo22, Regions Hospital23, Washington University in St. Louis24, University of Ottawa25, University of Sydney26, University of New South Wales27, Fujita Health University28, University of Copenhagen29, Sapienza University of Rome30, Christiana Care Health System31, Stanford University32, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology33, University of Kansas34, Harvard University35, California Pacific Medical Center36, University of Amsterdam37, Université libre de Bruxelles38, Houston Methodist Hospital39
TL;DR: A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was assembled at key international meetings (forSurviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012 as discussed by the authors ).
Abstract: Objective:To provide an update to “Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012.”Design:A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for
2,414 citations
Authors
Showing all 28240 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Majid Ezzati | 133 | 443 | 137171 |
| Christian Guilleminault | 133 | 897 | 68844 |
| Jean Rivier | 133 | 769 | 73919 |
| Myron M. Levine | 123 | 789 | 60865 |
| Werner Seeger | 114 | 1113 | 57464 |
| Katherine L. Tucker | 106 | 683 | 39404 |
| Michael Bader | 103 | 735 | 37525 |
| Paulo A. Lotufo | 89 | 622 | 100527 |
| Fernando Q. Cunha | 88 | 682 | 31501 |
| Paul R. Sanberg | 87 | 635 | 29745 |
| Harold A. Chapman | 87 | 191 | 26617 |
| Ricardo T. Gazzinelli | 86 | 340 | 28233 |
| Carlito B. Lebrilla | 86 | 495 | 25415 |
| Roger S. McIntyre | 85 | 807 | 32040 |
| Sergio Tufik | 85 | 1424 | 35174 |