Institution
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Nonprofit•Cape Town, South Africa•
About: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center is a nonprofit organization based out in Cape Town, South Africa. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 12322 authors who have published 30954 publications receiving 2288772 citations. The organization is also known as: Fred Hutch & The Hutch.
Topics: Population, Transplantation, Cancer, Breast cancer, Prostate cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of California, San Diego1, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center2, University of Washington3, University of California, Los Angeles4, University of British Columbia5, McGill University6, University of Alabama7, Monogram Biosciences8, Veterans Health Administration9, University of Colorado Denver10
TL;DR: Testing for resistance to drugs before therapy begins is now indicated even for recently infected patients, as the proportion of new HIV infections that involve drug-resistant virus is increasing in North America.
Abstract: Background Among persons in North America who are newly infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the prevalence of transmitted resistance to antiretroviral drugs has been estimated at 1 to 11 percent. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs before treatment and drug-resistance mutations in HIV in plasma samples from 377 subjects with primary HIV infection who had not yet received treatment and who were identified between May 1995 and June 2000 in 10 North American cities. Responses to treatment could be evaluated in 202 subjects. Results Over the five-year period, the frequency of transmitted drug resistance increased significantly. The frequency of high-level resistance to one or more drugs (indicated by a value of more than 10 for the ratio of the 50 percent inhibitory concentration [IC50] for the subject's virus to the IC50 for a drug-sensitive reference virus) increased from 3.4 percent during the period from 1995 to 1998 to 12.4 percent dur...
1,148 citations
••
National Institutes of Health1, Cancer Prevention Institute of California2, Michigan Department of Community Health3, Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station4, University of Hawaii at Manoa5, University of Iowa6, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center7, New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services8, Texas Department of State Health Services9, United States Department of Health and Human Services10
TL;DR: Standardized incidence ratios and excess absolute risks assessing relative and absolute cancer risk in transplant recipients compared with the general population to describe the overall pattern of cancer following solid organ transplantation are described.
Abstract: Context Solid organ transplant recipients have elevated cancer risk due to immunosuppression and oncogenic viral infections. Because most prior research has concerned kidney recipients, large studies that include recipients of differing organs can inform cancer etiology. Objective To describe the overall pattern of cancer following solid organ transplantion. Design, Setting, and Participants Cohort study using linked data on solid organ transplant recipients from the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (1987-2008) and 13 state and regional cancer registries. Main Outcome Measures Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and excess absolute risks (EARs) assessing relative and absolute cancer risk in transplant recipients compared with the general population. Results The registry linkages yielded data on 175 732 solid organ transplants (58.4% for kidney, 21.6% for liver, 10.0% for heart, and 4.0% for lung). The overall cancer risk was elevated with 10 656 cases and an incidence of 1375 per 100 000 person-years (SIR, 2.10 [95% CI, 2.06-2.14]; EAR, 719.3 [95% CI, 693.3-745.6] per 100 000 person-years). Risk was increased for 32 different malignancies, some related to known infections (eg, anal cancer, Kaposi sarcoma) and others unrelated (eg, melanoma, thyroid and lip cancers). The most common malignancies with elevated risk were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 1504; incidence: 194.0 per 100 000 person-years; SIR, 7.54 [95% CI, 7.17-7.93]; EAR, 168.3 [95% CI, 158.6-178.4] per 100 000 person-years) and cancers of the lung (n = 1344; incidence: 173.4 per 100 000 person-years; SIR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.86-2.08]; EAR, 85.3 [95% CI, 76.2-94.8] per 100 000 person-years), liver (n = 930; incidence: 120.0 per 100 000 person-years; SIR, 11.56 [95% CI, 10.83-12.33]; EAR, 109.6 [95% CI, 102.0-117.6] per 100 000 person-years), and kidney (n = 752; incidence: 97.0 per 100 000 person-years; SIR, 4.65 [95% CI, 4.32-4.99]; EAR, 76.1 [95% CI, 69.3-83.3] per 100 000 person-years). Lung cancer risk was most elevated in lung recipients (SIR, 6.13 [95% CI, 5.18-7.21]) but also increased among other recipients (kidney: SIR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.34-1.59]; liver: SIR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.74-2.19]; and heart: SIR, 2.67 [95% CI, 2.40-2.95]). Liver cancer risk was elevated only among liver recipients (SIR, 43.83 [95% CI, 40.90-46.91]), who manifested exceptional risk in the first 6 months (SIR, 508.97 [95% CI, 474.16-545.66]) and a 2-fold excess risk for 10 to 15 years thereafter (SIR, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.57-3.04]). Among kidney recipients, kidney cancer risk was elevated (SIR, 6.66 [95% CI, 6.12-7.23]) and bimodal in onset time. Kidney cancer risk also was increased in liver recipients (SIR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.40-2.29]) and heart recipients (SIR, 2.90 [95% CI, 2.32-3.59]). Conclusion Compared with the general population, recipients of a kidney, liver, heart, or lung transplant have an increased risk for diverse infection-related and unrelated cancers.
1,147 citations
••
TL;DR: This study suggests that radical prostatectomy is associated with significant erectile dysfunction and some decline in urinary function, and these results may be particularly helpful to community-based physicians and their patients with prostate cancer who face difficult treatment decisions.
Abstract: ContextPatients with prostate cancer and their physicians need knowledge of
treatment options and their potential complications, but limited data on complications
are available in unselected population-based cohorts of patients.ObjectiveTo measure changes in urinary and sexual function in men who have undergone
radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.DesignThe Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study, a population-based longitudinal
cohort study with up to 24 months of follow-up.SettingPopulation-based cancer registries in 6 geographic regions of the United
States.ParticipantsA total of 1291 black, white, and Hispanic men aged 39 to 79 years who
were diagnosed as having primary prostate cancer between October 1, 1994,
and October 31, 1995, and who underwent radical prostatectomy within 6 months
of diagnosis for clinically localized disease.Main Outcome MeasuresDistribution of and change in urinary and sexual function measures reported
by patients at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months after diagnosis.ResultsAt 18 or more months following radical prostatectomy, 8.4% of men were
incontinent and 59.9% were impotent. Among men who were potent before surgery,
the proportion of men reporting impotence at 18 or more months after surgery
varied according to whether the procedure was nerve sparing (65.6% of non–nerve-sparing,
58.6% of unilateral, and 56.0% of bilateral nerve–sparing). At 18 or
more months after surgery, 41.9% reported that their sexual performance was
a moderate-to-large problem. Both sexual and urinary function varied by age
(39.0% of men aged <60 years vs 15.3%-21.7% of older men were potent at ≥18
months [P<.001]; 13.8% of men aged 75-79 years
vs 0.7%-3.6% of younger men experienced the highest level of incontinence
at ≥18 months [P = .03]), and sexual function
also varied by race (38.4% of black men reported firm erections at ≥18
months vs 25.9% of Hispanic and 21.3% of white men; P
= .001).ConclusionsOur study suggests that radical prostatectomy is associated with significant
erectile dysfunction and some decline in urinary function. These results may
be particularly helpful to community-based physicians and their patients with
prostate cancer who face difficult treatment decisions.
1,146 citations
•
[...]
01 Jan 1998
TL;DR: For example, it has become increasingly clear over the past two decades that knowledge from one organism, even one so simple as a worm, can provide tremendous power when connected with knowledge from other organisms.
Abstract: Why should one study a worm? This simple creature is one of several “model” organisms that together have provided tremendous insight into how all organisms are put together. It has become increasingly clear over the past two decades that knowledge from one organism, even one so simple as a worm, can provide tremendous power when connected with knowledge from other organisms. And because of the experimental accessibility of nematodes, knowledge about worms can come more quickly and cheaply than knowledge about higher organisms.
1,138 citations
••
Cornell University1, University of Porto2, Imperial College London3, National Institutes of Health4, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center5, Princeton University6, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory7, Garvan Institute of Medical Research8, Stanford University9, University of Copenhagen10, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center11
TL;DR: This Review summarizes the main processes and new mechanisms involved in the formation of the pre-metastatic niche and describes the main mechanisms used to modify organs of future metastasis.
Abstract: It is well established that organs of future metastasis are not passive receivers of circulating tumour cells, but are instead selectively and actively modified by the primary tumour before metastatic spread has even occurred. Sowing the 'seeds' of metastasis requires the action of tumour-secreted factors and tumour-shed extracellular vesicles that enable the 'soil' at distant metastatic sites to encourage the outgrowth of incoming cancer cells. In this Review, we summarize the main processes and new mechanisms involved in the formation of the pre-metastatic niche.
1,134 citations
Authors
Showing all 12368 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Walter C. Willett | 334 | 2399 | 413322 |
Robert Langer | 281 | 2324 | 326306 |
Meir J. Stampfer | 277 | 1414 | 283776 |
JoAnn E. Manson | 270 | 1819 | 258509 |
David J. Hunter | 213 | 1836 | 207050 |
Peer Bork | 206 | 697 | 245427 |
Eric Boerwinkle | 183 | 1321 | 170971 |
Ruedi Aebersold | 182 | 879 | 141881 |
Bruce M. Psaty | 181 | 1205 | 138244 |
Aaron R. Folsom | 181 | 1118 | 134044 |
David Baker | 173 | 1226 | 109377 |
Frederick W. Alt | 171 | 577 | 95573 |
Lily Yeh Jan | 162 | 467 | 73655 |
Yuh Nung Jan | 162 | 460 | 74818 |
Charles N. Serhan | 158 | 728 | 84810 |