Institution
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Nonprofit•Cape Town, South Africa•
About: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center is a nonprofit organization based out in Cape Town, South Africa. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 12322 authors who have published 30954 publications receiving 2288772 citations. The organization is also known as: Fred Hutch & The Hutch.
Topics: Population, Transplantation, Cancer, Breast cancer, Prostate cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that four different proteins from calf thymus are able to restore splicing in the same splicing-deficient extract using several different pre-mRNA substrates, and a repeated protein sequence that encompasses an RNA recognition motif was observed.
Abstract: We demonstrate that four different proteins from calf thymus are able to restore splicing in the same splicing-deficient extract using several different pre-mRNA substrates. These proteins are members of a conserved family of proteins recognized by a monoclonal antibody that binds to active sites of RNA polymerase II transcription. We purified this family of nuclear phosphoproteins to apparent homogeneity by two salt precipitations. The family, called SR proteins for their serine- and arginine-rich carboxy-terminal domains, consists of at least five different proteins with molecular masses of 20, 30, 40, 55, and 75 kD. Microsequencing revealed that they are related but not identical. In four of the family members a repeated protein sequence that encompasses an RNA recognition motif was observed. We discuss the potential role of this highly conserved, functionally related set of proteins in pre-mRNA splicing.
740 citations
••
TL;DR: Using a multistage genetic association approach comprising 7,480 affected individuals and 7,779 controls, markers in chromosomal region 8q24 associated with colorectal cancer were identified and this locus has been implicated in prostate cancer.
Abstract: Using a multistage genetic association approach comprising 7,480 affected individuals and 7,779 controls, we identified markers in chromosomal region 8q24 associated with colorectal cancer. In stage 1, we genotyped 99,632 SNPs in 1,257 affected individuals and 1,336 controls from Ontario. In stages 2-4, we performed serial replication studies using 4,024 affected individuals and 4,042 controls from Seattle, Newfoundland and Scotland. We identified one locus on chromosome 8q24 and another on 9p24 having combined odds ratios (OR) for stages 1-4 of 1.18 (trend; P = 1.41 x 10(-8)) and 1.14 (trend; P = 1.32 x 10(-5)), respectively. Additional analyses in 2,199 affected individuals and 2,401 controls from France and Europe supported the association at the 8q24 locus (OR = 1.16, trend; 95% confidence interval (c.i.): 1.07-1.26; P = 5.05 x 10(-4)). A summary across all seven studies at the 8q24 locus was highly significant (OR = 1.17, c.i.: 1.12-1.23; P = 3.16 x 10(-11)). This locus has also been implicated in prostate cancer.
739 citations
••
University of Toronto1, German Cancer Research Center2, University of Düsseldorf3, University of Pittsburgh4, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research5, Seoul National University6, University of Warsaw7, University of Lyon8, Mayo Clinic9, The Chinese University of Hong Kong10, Johns Hopkins University11, University of Alabama at Birmingham12, University of Washington13, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center14, University of California, San Francisco15, Hamilton Health Sciences16, McMaster University17, Vanderbilt University18, University of Colorado Denver19, Semmelweis University20, Erasmus University Rotterdam21, University of Ulsan22, Kitasato University23, Mexican Social Security Institute24, Masaryk University25, Emory University26, University of Debrecen27, University of Naples Federico II28, Washington University in St. Louis29, McGill University30, Montreal Children's Hospital31, Virginia Commonwealth University32, Chonnam National University33, University of Queensland34, University of Calgary35, University of São Paulo36, University of Cincinnati37, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences38, The Catholic University of America39, University of California, Los Angeles40, University of Sydney41, Kumamoto University42, Saint Louis University43, Case Western Reserve University44
TL;DR: Similarity network fusion (SNF) applied to genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression data across 763 primary samples identifies very homogeneous clusters of patients, supporting the presence of medulloblastoma subtypes.
737 citations
••
TL;DR: It is concluded that mRNA changes are not attributable to cell loss alone, and data from bona fide HD brains comprise an important reference for hypotheses related to HD and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Abstract: Huntington's disease (HD) pathology is well understood at a histological level but a comprehensive molecular analysis of the effect of the disease in the human brain has not previously been available. To elucidate the molecular phenotype of HD on a genome-wide scale, we compared mRNA profiles from 44 human HD brains with those from 36 unaffected controls using microarray analysis. Four brain regions were analyzed: caudate nucleus, cerebellum, prefrontal association cortex [Brodmann's area 9 (BA9)] and motor cortex [Brodmann's area 4 (BA4)]. The greatest number and magnitude of differentially expressed mRNAs were detected in the caudate nucleus, followed by motor cortex, then cerebellum. Thus, the molecular phenotype of HD generally parallels established neuropathology. Surprisingly, no mRNA changes were detected in prefrontal association cortex, thereby revealing subtleties of pathology not previously disclosed by histological methods. To establish that the observed changes were not simply the result of cell loss, we examined mRNA levels in laser-capture microdissected neurons from Grade 1 HD caudate compared to control. These analyses confirmed changes in expression seen in tissue homogenates; we thus conclude that mRNA changes are not attributable to cell loss alone. These data from bona fide HD brains comprise an important reference for hypotheses related to HD and other neurodegenerative diseases.
736 citations
••
TL;DR: Some of the general principles by which uORFs participate in translational control are beginning to be understood are reviewed, which include the process of recognition of uORs, regulation of reinitiation at downstream cistrons after translation of u ORFs, and regulatory effects of peptides encoded by uORF.
Abstract: Continuing discoveries of new and surprising mechanisms of gene regulation suggest that our understanding of this complex and ubiquitous biological process remains incomplete. Emerging examples illustrate that many and perhaps all genes are regulated at multiple steps including transcription, posttranscriptional processing, nuclear export and localization, stability, and translation of mature mRNA molecules. Translation itself is regulated by a diverse collection of mechanisms that act not only at the initiation step but also during elongation and termination and even after termination.
Among the various cis elements in mRNAs (43) that participate in regulating translation are AUG codons within transcript leaders (upstream AUGs [uAUGs]) and, in some cases, associated upstream open reading frames (uORFs). Based on a 1987 survey, less than 10% of eukaryotic mRNAs contain AUG codons within their transcript leader regions (often erroneously referred to as 5′ untranslated regions). However, uAUGs are conspicuously common in certain classes of genes, including two-thirds of oncogenes and many other genes involved in the control of cellular growth and differentiation (29, 31, 42). Despite the wealth of sequence data being generated by large-scale sequencing projects, extracting an up-to-date, comprehensive, and accurate estimate of the number of genes with uORFs is a formidable task. Only a minority of database entries are based on careful mRNA mapping data with annotations that identify the precise start of the transcript leader. Moreover, the use of alternative transcriptional start sites, alternative RNA processing, and alternative initiation codons complicates the determination of what exactly constitutes the transcript leader. Nonetheless, it is clear that uAUGs are not uncommon in genes with critical cellular roles, and identifying when and how they function is necessary if we are to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the interesting genes that contain these elements and of eukaryotic gene regulation in general.
Some of the general principles by which uORFs participate in translational control are beginning to be understood. In this article, we first review these principles, which include the process of recognition of uORFs, regulation of reinitiation at downstream cistrons after translation of uORFs, and regulatory effects of peptides encoded by uORFs. We then illustrate how these principles are applied by reviewing several specific examples where the roles of uORFs in translational control have been well characterized.
734 citations
Authors
Showing all 12368 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Walter C. Willett | 334 | 2399 | 413322 |
Robert Langer | 281 | 2324 | 326306 |
Meir J. Stampfer | 277 | 1414 | 283776 |
JoAnn E. Manson | 270 | 1819 | 258509 |
David J. Hunter | 213 | 1836 | 207050 |
Peer Bork | 206 | 697 | 245427 |
Eric Boerwinkle | 183 | 1321 | 170971 |
Ruedi Aebersold | 182 | 879 | 141881 |
Bruce M. Psaty | 181 | 1205 | 138244 |
Aaron R. Folsom | 181 | 1118 | 134044 |
David Baker | 173 | 1226 | 109377 |
Frederick W. Alt | 171 | 577 | 95573 |
Lily Yeh Jan | 162 | 467 | 73655 |
Yuh Nung Jan | 162 | 460 | 74818 |
Charles N. Serhan | 158 | 728 | 84810 |