Institution
Georgia State University
Education•Atlanta, Georgia, United States•
About: Georgia State University is a education organization based out in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 13988 authors who have published 35895 publications receiving 1164332 citations. The organization is also known as: GSU & Georgia State.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Context (language use), Stars, Mental health
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: This paper presents the exegesis of a DSRIS research project in which creating a (prescriptive) design theory through the process of developing and testing an information systems artifact is inextricably bound to the testing and refinement of its kernel theory.
Abstract: The common understanding of design science research in information systems (DSRIS) continues to evolve. Only in the broadest terms has there been consensus: that DSRIS involves, in some way, learning through the act of building. However, what is to be built – the definition of the DSRIS artifact – and how it is to be built – the methodology of DSRIS – has drawn increasing discussion in recent years. The relationship of DSRIS to theory continues to make up a significant part of the discussion: how theory should inform DSRIS and whether or not DSRIS can or should be instrumental in developing and refining theory. In this paper, we present the exegesis of a DSRIS research project in which creating a (prescriptive) design theory through the process of developing and testing an information systems artifact is inextricably bound to the testing and refinement of its kernel theory.
582 citations
••
TL;DR: The findings suggest that the containment strategies implemented in China are successfully reducing transmission and that the epidemic growth has slowed in recent days.
578 citations
••
TL;DR: There is an urgent need for the development of new methods for the efficient detection of sulfide in biological systems because current methods do not allow for fast, accurate, and real-time determinations of this important molecule.
Abstract: Hydrogen sulfide (H2S), well known for its unpleasant rotten egg smell, was traditionally considered as a toxic gas. However, recent studies have demonstrated that hydrogen sulfide is an endogenously produced gaseous signaling compound (gasotransmitter) with importance on par with that of the other two known endogenous gasotransmitters, nitric oxide (NO)[1] and carbon monoxide (CO).[2] H2S has been recognized for mediating a wide range of physiological effects. Studies have shown that H2S can have an effect on the cardiovascular system[3] by acting as a K-ATP channel opener.[4] Several studies have shown the protective roles of H2S, in situations such as myocardial ischemia, most likely through a combination of antioxidant and anti-apoptotic signaling.[5] Further studies also showed that H2S may be a therapeutic benefit for the treatment of ischemia-induced heart failure.[6-7] It is also a modulator in the central nervous system,[8-10] respiratory system, gastrointestinal system, and endocrine system.[11] It seems that hydrogen sulfide exhibits almost all the beneficial effects of NO without generating the toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS). In contrast, it also acts as an anti-oxidant or scavenger of ROS. Furthermore, research has indicated that hydrogen sulfide level is related to diseases such as Down syndrome[12] and Alzheimer’s disease.[13] Therefore, recent years have seen a steady increase in the interest in understanding hydrogen sulfide ’s physiological and pathological functions.[11, 14-15] One significant limiting factor in studying hydrogen sulfide is the lack of sensors and agents that allow for its rapid and accurate detection. There have been literature methods using colorimetric,[16-18] electrochemical analysis[19-21] and gas chromatography.[22-23] However, hydrogen sulfide catabolism is known to be fast, which could result in continuous fluctuation in its concentration, leading to difficulties in accurate analysis of this important molecule. Current methods do not allow for fast, accurate, and real-time determinations. Literature reported endogenous sulfide concentrations vary substantially among publications with most publications suggesting that sulfide concentration in blood is in the 10-100 μM range.[24-29] There are other studies suggesting sulfide concentration being much lower than this.[30-31] Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of new methods for the efficient detection of sulfide in biological systems.
577 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a general framework for understanding the role of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in bankruptcy prediction and demonstrate the link between neural networks and traditional Bayesian classification theory.
577 citations
••
TL;DR: This review presents some of the problems and current treatment options contributing to the poor outcomes for patients with liver cancer and suggests use of natural compounds and/or nanotechnology may provide patients with better outcomes with lower systemic toxicity and fewer side effects.
577 citations
Authors
Showing all 14161 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Paul M. Thompson | 183 | 2271 | 146736 |
Michael Tomasello | 155 | 797 | 93361 |
Han Zhang | 130 | 970 | 58863 |
David B. Audretsch | 126 | 671 | 72456 |
Ian O. Ellis | 126 | 1051 | 75435 |
John R. Perfect | 119 | 573 | 52325 |
Vince D. Calhoun | 117 | 1234 | 62205 |
Timothy E. Hewett | 116 | 531 | 49310 |
Kenta Shigaki | 113 | 570 | 42914 |
Eric Courchesne | 107 | 240 | 41200 |
Cynthia M. Bulik | 107 | 714 | 41562 |
Shaker A. Zahra | 104 | 293 | 63532 |
Robin G. Morris | 98 | 519 | 32080 |
Richard H. Myers | 97 | 316 | 54203 |
Walter H. Kaye | 96 | 403 | 30915 |