Institution
Government of Extremadura
Government•Badajoz, Spain•
About: Government of Extremadura is a government organization based out in Badajoz, Spain. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Acrylamide & Population. The organization has 57 authors who have published 61 publications receiving 1340 citations.
Topics: Acrylamide, Population, Deficit irrigation, Hydroxytyrosol, Psychosocial
Papers
More filters
••
University of Sfax1, University of Münster2, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg3, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases4, University of Gafsa5, Rio de Janeiro State University6, University of Twente7, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart8, Estácio S.A.9, American University in the Emirates10, Imam Khomeini International University11, University of Paris12, University of Genoa13, University of Arkansas14, Stanford University15, University of Toulouse16, Assiut University17, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology18, Georgia Southern University19, Government of Extremadura20, University Medical Center Groningen21, University of Ulm22, Yarmouk University23, University of Jordan24, University of Porto25, Loughborough University26, Paris West University Nanterre La Défense27
TL;DR: Results indicate that isolation is a necessary measure to protect public health, but results indicate that it alters physical activity and eating behaviours in a health compromising direction.
Abstract: Background: Public health recommendations and governmental measures during the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in numerous restrictions on daily living including social distancing, isolation and home confinement. While these measures are imperative to abate the spreading of COVID-19, the impact of these restrictions on health behaviours and lifestyles at home is undefined. Therefore, an international online survey was launched in April 2020, in seven languages, to elucidate the behavioural and lifestyle consequences of COVID-19 restrictions. This report presents the results from the first thousand responders on physical activity (PA) and nutrition behaviours. Methods: Following a structured review of the literature, the “Effects of home Confinement on multiple Lifestyle Behaviours during the COVID-19 outbreak (ECLB-COVID19)” Electronic survey was designed by a steering group of multidisciplinary scientists and academics. The survey was uploaded and shared on the Google online survey platform. Thirty-five research organisations from Europe, North-Africa, Western Asia and the Americas promoted the survey in English, German, French, Arabic, Spanish, Portuguese and Slovenian languages. Questions were presented in a differential format, with questions related to responses “before” and “during” confinement conditions. Results: 1047 replies (54% women) from Asia (36%), Africa (40%), Europe (21%) and other (3%) were included in the analysis. The COVID-19 home confinement had a negative effect on all PA intensity levels (vigorous, moderate, walking and overall). Additionally, daily sitting time increased from 5 to 8 h per day. Food consumption and meal patterns (the type of food, eating out of control, snacks between meals, number of main meals) were more unhealthy during confinement, with only alcohol binge drinking decreasing significantly. Conclusion: While isolation is a necessary measure to protect public health, results indicate that it alters physical activity and eating behaviours in a health compromising direction. A more detailed analysis of survey data will allow for a segregation of these responses in different age groups, countries and other subgroups, which will help develop interventions to mitigate the negative lifestyle behaviours that have manifested during the COVID-19 confinement.
1,275 citations
••
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg1, University of Sfax2, University of Münster3, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases4, University of Gafsa5, Rio de Janeiro State University6, University of Twente7, Estácio S.A.8, Canadian University of Dubai9, Imam Khomeini International University10, University of Paris11, York University12, University of Genoa13, Paris West University Nanterre La Défense14, University of Thessaly15, Loughborough University16, Stanford University17, University of Toulouse18, Assiut University19, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology20, Georgia Southern University21, Government of Extremadura22, University Medical Center Groningen23, University of Ulm24, Yarmouk University25, University of Jordan26, University of Porto27, ISCTE – University Institute of Lisbon28, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart29, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw30, University of Sousse31, University of Arkansas32, Manouba University33
TL;DR: The preliminary findings elucidate the risk of psychosocial strain during the early COVID-19 home confinement period in 2020 and suggest implementation of national strategies focused on promoting social inclusion through a technology-based solution is strongly suggested.
Abstract: Public health recommendations and governmental measures during the new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic have enforced numerous restrictions on daily living including social distancing, isolation, and home confinement. While these measures are imperative to mitigate spreading of COVID-19, the impact of these restrictions on psychosocial health is undefined. Therefore, an international online survey was launched in April 2020 to elucidate the behavioral and lifestyle consequences of COVID-19 restrictions. This report presents the preliminary results from more than one thousand responders on social participation and life satisfaction. Methods: Thirty-five research organizations from Europe, North-Africa, Western Asia, and the Americas promoted the survey through their networks to the general society, in 7 languages (English, German, French, Arabic, Spanish, Portuguese, and Slovenian). Questions were presented in a differential format with questions related to responses “before” and “during” confinement conditions. Results: 1047 participations (54% women) from Asia (36%), Africa (40%), Europe (21%), and others (3%) were included in the analysis. Findings revealed psychosocial strain during the enforced COVID-19 home confinement. Large decreases (p < 0.001) in the amount of social activity through family (−58%), friends/neighbors (−44.9%), or entertainment (−46.7%) were triggered by the enforced confinement. These negative effects on social participation were also associated with lower life satisfaction (−30.5%) during the confinement period. Conversely, the social contact score through digital technologies significantly increased (p < 0.001) during the confinement period with more individuals (+24.8%) being socially connected through digital technology. Conclusion: These preliminary findings elucidate the risk of psychosocial strain during the early COVID-19 home confinement period in 2020. Therefore, in order to mitigate the negative psychosocial effects of home confinement, implementation of national strategies focused on promoting social inclusion through a technology-based solution is strongly suggested.
284 citations
••
University of Sfax1, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg2, University of Münster3, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases4, Rio de Janeiro State University5, University of Twente6, Estácio S.A.7, Canadian University of Dubai8, Imam Khomeini International University9, University of Paris10, York University11, University of Giessen12, University of Arkansas13, Stanford University14, University of Toulouse15, University of Thessaly16, Assiut University17, Georgia Southern University18, Government of Extremadura19, University of Groningen20, University of Ulm21, Yarmouk University22, University of Jordan23, University of Porto24, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart25, Loughborough University26
TL;DR: The findings elucidate the risk of psychosocial strain during the COVID-19 home confinement period and provide a clear remit for the urgent implementation of technology-based intervention to foster an Active and Healthy Confinement Lifestyle AHCL.
Abstract: Although recognised as effective measures to curb the spread of the COVID-19 outbreak, social distancing and self-isolation have been suggested to generate a burden throughout the population. To provide scientific data to help identify risk factors for the psychosocial strain during the COVID-19 outbreak, an international cross-disciplinary online survey was circulated in April 2020. This report outlines the mental, emotional and behavioural consequences of COVID-19 home confinement. The ECLB-COVID19 electronic survey was designed by a steering group of multidisciplinary scientists, following a structured review of the literature. The survey was uploaded and shared on the Google online survey platform and was promoted by thirty-five research organizations from Europe, North Africa, Western Asia and the Americas. Questions were presented in a differential format with questions related to responses “before” and “during” the confinement period. 1047 replies (54% women) from Western Asia (36%), North Africa (40%), Europe (21%) and other continents (3%) were analysed. The COVID-19 home confinement evoked a negative effect on mental wellbeing and emotional status (P < 0.001; 0.43 ≤ d ≤ 0.65) with a greater proportion of individuals experiencing psychosocial and emotional disorders (+10% to +16.5%). These psychosocial tolls were associated with unhealthy lifestyle behaviours with a greater proportion of individuals experiencing (i) physical (+15.2%) and social (+71.2%) inactivity, (ii) poor sleep quality (+12.8%), (iii) unhealthy diet behaviours (+10%), and (iv) unemployment (6%). Conversely, participants demonstrated a greater use (+15%) of technology during the confinement period. These findings elucidate the risk of psychosocial strain during the COVID-19 home confinement period and provide a clear remit for the urgent implementation of technology-based intervention to foster an Active and Healthy Confinement Lifestyle AHCL).
218 citations
••
Paris West University Nanterre La Défense1, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg2, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases3, University of Sfax4, University of Münster5, University of Gafsa6, Rio de Janeiro State University7, University of Twente8, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart9, Estácio S.A.10, Canadian University of Dubai11, Imam Khomeini International University12, University of Paris13, University of Genoa14, York University15, University of Arkansas16, Stanford University17, University of Toulouse18, University of Thessaly19, Assiut University20, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology21, Loughborough University22, Government of Extremadura23, University Medical Center Groningen24, University of Ulm25, Yarmouk University26, University of Jordan27, University of Porto28, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw29, Georgia Southern University30, Manouba University31, Qatar Airways32
TL;DR: The ECLB-COVID19 survey revealed an increased psychosocial strain triggered by the home confinement, and a crisis-oriented interdisciplinary intervention is urgently needed to mitigate this high risk of mental disorders.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Public health recommendations and government measures during the COVID-19 pandemic have enforced restrictions on daily-living. While these measures are imperative to abate the spreading of COVID-19, the impact of these restrictions on mental health and emotional wellbeing is undefined. Therefore, an international online survey (ECLB-COVID19) was launched on April 6, 2020 in seven languages to elucidate the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on mental health and emotional wellbeing. METHODS: The ECLB-COVID19 electronic survey was designed by a steering group of multidisciplinary scientists, following a structured review of the literature. The survey was uploaded and shared on the Google online-survey-platform and was promoted by thirty-five research organizations from Europe, North-Africa, Western-Asia and the Americas. All participants were asked for their mental wellbeing (SWEMWS) and depressive symptoms (SMFQ) with regard to "during" and "before" home confinement. RESULTS: Analysis was conducted on the first 1047 replies (54% women) from Asia (36%), Africa (40%), Europe (21%) and other (3%). The COVID-19 home confinement had a negative effect on both mental-wellbeing and on mood and feelings. Specifically, a significant decrease (p < .001 and Δ% = 9.4%) in total score of the SWEMWS questionnaire was noted. More individuals (+12.89%) reported a low mental wellbeing "during" compared to "before" home confinement. Furthermore, results from the mood and feelings questionnaire showed a significant increase by 44.9% (p < .001) in SMFQ total score with more people (+10%) showing depressive symptoms "during" compared to "before" home confinement. CONCLUSION: The ECLB-COVID19 survey revealed an increased psychosocial strain triggered by the home confinement. To mitigate this high risk of mental disorders and to foster an Active and Healthy Confinement Lifestyle (AHCL), a crisis-oriented interdisciplinary intervention is urgently needed.
194 citations
••
University of Sfax1, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg2, Paris West University Nanterre La Défense3, University of Münster4, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases5, Rio de Janeiro State University6, University of Twente7, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart8, Estácio S.A.9, Canadian University of Dubai10, Imam Khomeini International University11, University of Genoa12, Keele University13, Loughborough University14, Stanford University15, University of Toulouse16, University of Thessaly17, Assiut University18, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology19, Georgia Southern University20, Government of Extremadura21, University Medical Center Groningen22, University of Ulm23, Yarmouk University24, University of Jordan25, Qatar Airways26, University of Porto27, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw28, University of Arkansas29, University of Paris30, Coventry University31, University of Sousse32, Manouba University33
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated whether sociodemographic variables, changes in physical activity, and sleep quality from pre- to during lockdown were predictors of change in mental wellbeing in quarantined older adults.
Abstract: Background. The COVID-19 lockdown could engender disruption to lifestyle behaviors, thus impairing mental wellbeing in the general population. This study investigated whether sociodemographic variables, changes in physical activity, and sleep quality from pre- to during lockdown were predictors of change in mental wellbeing in quarantined older adults. Methods. A 12-week international online survey was launched in 14 languages on 6 April 2020. Forty-one research institutions from Europe, Western-Asia, North-Africa, and the Americas, promoted the survey. The survey was presented in a differential format with questions related to responses “pre” and “during” the lockdown period. Participants responded to the Short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire, and the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Results. Replies from older adults (aged >55 years, n = 517), mainly from Europe (50.1%), Western-Asia (6.8%), America (30%), and North-Africa (9.3%) were analyzed. The COVID-19 lockdown led to significantly decreased mental wellbeing, sleep quality, and total physical activity energy expenditure levels (all p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that the change in total PSQI score and total physical activity energy expenditure (F(2, 514) = 66.41 p < 0.001) were significant predictors of the decrease in mental wellbeing from pre- to during lockdown (p < 0.001, R2: 0.20). Conclusion. COVID-19 lockdown deleteriously affected physical activity and sleep patterns. Furthermore, change in the total PSQI score and total physical activity energy expenditure were significant predictors for the decrease in mental wellbeing.
80 citations
Authors
Showing all 58 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Isabel Durán-Merás | 23 | 54 | 1308 |
Jonathan Gómez-Raja | 16 | 24 | 1321 |
Jonathan Delgado-Adámez | 14 | 35 | 461 |
M.H. Prieto | 12 | 39 | 379 |
Carlos Campillo | 12 | 38 | 398 |
Daniel Martín-Vertedor | 11 | 31 | 407 |
David Uriarte | 10 | 27 | 268 |
Daniel Moreno | 10 | 27 | 286 |
E. Valdés | 9 | 15 | 293 |
Esther Gamero | 9 | 13 | 247 |
Cristina Pereira | 8 | 11 | 133 |
Sara Martillanes | 7 | 15 | 139 |
Manuel Cabrera-Bañegil | 6 | 8 | 116 |
M. N. Franco | 6 | 7 | 177 |
Luis Alberto Mancha | 6 | 14 | 133 |