scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Greater Baltimore Medical Center

HealthcareBaltimore, Maryland, United States
About: Greater Baltimore Medical Center is a healthcare organization based out in Baltimore, Maryland, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Cancer. The organization has 711 authors who have published 981 publications receiving 38261 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors highlight the overall organizational and structural changes as well as “what's new” in the Eighth Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.
Abstract: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual has become the benchmark for classifying patients with cancer, defining prognosis, and determining the best treatment approaches. Many view the primary role of the tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) system as that of a standardized classification system for evaluating cancer at a population level in terms of the extent of disease, both at initial presentation and after surgical treatment, and the overall impact of improvements in cancer treatment. The rapid evolution of knowledge in cancer biology and the discovery and validation of biologic factors that predict cancer outcome and response to treatment with better accuracy have led some cancer experts to question the utility of a TNM-based approach in clinical care at an individualized patient level. In the Eighth Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, the goal of including relevant, nonanatomic (including molecular) factors has been foremost, although changes are made only when there is strong evidence for inclusion. The editorial board viewed this iteration as a proactive effort to continue to build the important bridge from a "population-based" to a more "personalized" approach to patient classification, one that forms the conceptual framework and foundation of cancer staging in the era of precision molecular oncology. The AJCC promulgates best staging practices through each new edition in an effort to provide cancer care providers with a powerful, knowledge-based resource for the battle against cancer. In this commentary, the authors highlight the overall organizational and structural changes as well as "what's new" in the Eighth Edition. It is hoped that this information will provide the reader with a better understanding of the rationale behind the aggregate proposed changes and the exciting developments in the upcoming edition. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:93-99. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

3,362 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There seems to be a genuine need for consistent international clinical classification systems for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema that are supported with solid evidence.

2,665 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
26 Aug 2011-Science
TL;DR: To explore the genetic origins of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, whole-exome sequencing and gene copy number analyses were used to study 32 primary tumors and identified mutations in FBXW7 and NotCH1, suggesting that NOTCH1 may function as a tumor suppressor gene rather than an oncogene in this tumor type.
Abstract: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide. To explore the genetic origins of this cancer, we used whole-exome sequencing and gene copy number analyses to study 32 primary tumors. Tumors from patients with a history of tobacco use had more mutations than did tumors from patients who did not use tobacco, and tumors that were negative for human papillomavirus (HPV) had more mutations than did HPV-positive tumors. Six of the genes that were mutated in multiple tumors were assessed in up to 88 additional HNSCCs. In addition to previously described mutations in TP53, CDKN2A, PIK3CA, and HRAS, we identified mutations in FBXW7 and NOTCH1. Nearly 40% of the 28 mutations identified in NOTCH1 were predicted to truncate the gene product, suggesting that NOTCH1 may function as a tumor suppressor gene rather than an oncogene in this tumor type.

1,613 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The proposed basic clinical classification scale seems to be of value in predicting the risk of late AMD, and incorporating consistent nomenclature into the practice patterns of all eye care providers may improve communication and patient care.

1,114 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Lumpectomy plus adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen alone is a realistic choice for the treatment of women 70 years of age or older who have early, estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.
Abstract: BACKGROUND In women 70 years of age or older who have early breast cancer, it is unclear whether lumpectomy plus tamoxifen is as effective as lumpectomy followed by tamoxifen plus radiation therapy. METHODS Between July 1994 and February 1999, we randomly assigned 636 women who were 70 years of age or older and who had clinical stage I (T1N0M0 according to the tumor-node-metastasis classification), estrogen-receptor-positive breast carcinoma treated by lumpectomy to receive tamoxifen plus radiation therapy (317 women) or tamoxifen alone (319 women). Primary end points were the time to local or regional recurrence, the frequency of mastectomy for recurrence, breast-cancer-specific survival, the time to distant metastasis, and overall survival. RESULTS The only significant difference between the two groups was in the rate of local or regional recurrence at five years (1 percent in the group given tamoxifen plus irradiation and 4 percent in the group given tamoxifen alone, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the rates of mastectomy for local recurrence, distant metastases, or five-year rates of overall survival (87 percent in the group given tamoxifen plus irradiation and 86 percent in the tamoxifen group, P=0.94). Assessment by physicians and patients of cosmetic results and adverse events uniformly rated tamoxifen plus irradiation inferior to tamoxifen alone. CONCLUSIONS Lumpectomy plus adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen alone is a realistic choice for the treatment of women 70 years of age or older who have early, estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.

939 citations


Authors

Showing all 713 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Richard A. Gibbs172889249708
David Sidransky13864490897
Diane R. Gold9544330717
Joseph A. Califano8140328534
W. Richard Green7235521077
Argye E. Hillis6839822230
Kenneth R. Kenyon6128414762
Leonard E. Egede6139813837
Alan L. Robin5624213069
Clair A. Francomano5412813206
Mohammad O. Hoque531458672
James N. Palmer5333710296
Noam A. Cohen5324514077
Philip O. Katz462849279
Amanda N. Fader441899756
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
26.8K papers, 1.1M citations

83% related

Cleveland Clinic
79.3K papers, 3.4M citations

82% related

New York Medical College
18K papers, 681.8K citations

82% related

Medical College of Wisconsin
41.5K papers, 1.7M citations

81% related

Oregon Health & Science University
65.1K papers, 3.3M citations

81% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20231
20223
202161
202053
201951
201839