scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Grenoble School of Management

EducationGrenoble, France
About: Grenoble School of Management is a education organization based out in Grenoble, France. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Business model & Entrepreneurship. The organization has 359 authors who have published 1167 publications receiving 23515 citations. The organization is also known as: Grenoble École de management.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a cognitive framing perspective on corporate sustainability is developed, which explores how differences between them in cognitive content and structure influence the three stages of the sense-making process, that is, managerial scanning, interpreting, and responding with regard to sustainability issues.
Abstract: Corporate sustainability confronts managers with tensions between complex economic, environmental, and social issues. Drawing on the literature on managerial cognition, corporate sustainability, and strategic paradoxes, we develop a cognitive framing perspective on corporate sustainability. We propose two cognitive frames—a business case frame and a paradoxical frame—and explore how differences between them in cognitive content and structure influence the three stages of the sensemaking process—that is, managerial scanning, interpreting, and responding with regard to sustainability issues. We explain how the two frames lead to differences in the breadth and depth of scanning, differences in issue interpretations in terms of sense of control and issue valence, and different types of responses that managers consider with regard to sustainability issues. By considering alternative cognitive frames, our argument contributes to a better understanding of managerial decision making regarding ambiguous sustainability issues, and it develops the underlying cognitive determinants of the stance that managers adopt on sustainability issues. This argument offers a cognitive explanation for why managers rarely push for radical change when faced with complex and ambiguous issues, such as sustainability, that are characterized by conflicting yet interrelated aspects.

655 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a systematic framework for the analysis of tensions in corporate sustainability, which is based on the emerging integrative view on corporate sustainability and stresses the need for a simultaneous integration of economic, environmental and social dimensions without, a priori, emphasising one over any other.
Abstract: This paper proposes a systematic framework for the analysis of tensions in corporate sustainability. The framework is based on the emerging integrative view on corporate sustainability, which stresses the need for a simultaneous integration of economic, environmental and social dimensions without, a priori, emphasising one over any other. The integrative view presupposes that firms need to accept tensions in corporate sustainability and pursue different sustainability aspects simultaneously even if they seem to contradict each other. The framework proposed in this paper goes beyond the traditional triad of economic, environmental and social dimensions and argues that tensions in corporate sustainability occur between different levels, in change processes and within a temporal and spatial context. The framework provides vital groundwork for managing tensions in corporate sustainability based on paradox strategies. The paper then applies the framework to identify and characterise four selected tensions and illustrates how key approaches from the literature on strategic contradictions, tensions and paradoxes—i.e., acceptance and resolution strategies—can be used to manage these tensions. Thereby, it refines the emerging literature on the integrative view for the management of tensions in corporate sustainability. The framework also provides managers with a better understanding of tensions in corporate sustainability and enables them to embrace these tensions in their decision making.

603 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors take stock of the ambivalent and contested nature of the sharing economy and highlight the paradoxical nature of sharing economy, and make a case for balanced initiatives that combine the promises of each core while mitigating contradictions.

468 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors apply the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) to predict entrepreneurial behavior and find that attitude, perceived behavioural control and subjective norms are significant predictors of entrepreneuria.
Abstract: This article contributes to the occupational choice literature pertaining to entrepreneurship by applying the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) to predict entrepreneurial behaviour. Originating from social psychology, the TPB posits that intention, a function of behavioural beliefs, is a significant predictor of subsequent behaviour. In spite of an established stream of scholarship explaining the formation of entrepreneurial intentions, empirical research has not yet employed longitudinal data to examine whether the intention to start a business measured at one point of time translates into subsequent entrepreneurial behaviour. This article provides a full test of the TPB in the prediction of business start-up intentions and subsequent behaviour based on two-wave survey data (2006 and 2009) from the working-age population in Finland. The econometric results support the predictions outlined in the TPB: attitude, perceived behavioural control and subjective norms are significant predictors of entrepreneuria...

420 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: In an attempt to explain why some nascent organizations become new organizations while others do not, this paper argued that the process of organizational emergence can be understood and predicted by viewing it as a quest for legitimacy and found empirical evidence to suggest that the actions a nascent organization takes (or strategic legitimacy) may be more important than its characteristics (or conforming legitimacy) in explaining organizational emergence.
Abstract: In an attempt to explain why some nascent organizations become new organizations while others do not, we contend that the process of organizational emergence can be understood and predicted by viewing it as a quest for legitimacy. We subsequently find empirical evidence to suggest that the actions a nascent organization takes (or strategic legitimacy) may be more important than its characteristics (or conforming legitimacy) in explaining organizational emergence. Such a conclusion is important in that it provides a theoretical framework with which to understand organizational emergence and in so doing advances our knowledge of this important process.

386 citations


Authors

Showing all 371 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Mark Smith5443412854
Bodo B. Schlegelmilch5119410539
Simon Deakin483387163
Jonatan Pinkse421157630
Aldo Geuna4212310207
Rob Cross387914708
Joachim Schleich361634524
Vincent Mangematin351904665
H. Kevin Steensma32526817
Brendan Burchell31833105
Gabriele Piccoli311156826
Carole Bernard281442589
MB Sarkar26375539
Jacqueline O'Reilly261132816
Maximilian von Zedtwitz241054158
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Copenhagen Business School
9.6K papers, 341.8K citations

88% related

Vienna University of Economics and Business
6.6K papers, 176.4K citations

87% related

HEC Montréal
5.7K papers, 196.8K citations

87% related

Stockholm School of Economics
4.8K papers, 285.5K citations

86% related

Bocconi University
8.9K papers, 344.1K citations

86% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20233
202219
2021136
2020110
201996
2018122