scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

HealthcareLondon, United Kingdom
About: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust is a healthcare organization based out in London, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Randomized controlled trial. The organization has 7686 authors who have published 9631 publications receiving 399353 citations. The organization is also known as: Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust & Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Trust.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that bexarotene is effective in the management of CTCL, and has the advantage of oral administration, compared with interferon‐α, which is the other commonly used noncytotoxic systemic therapy for C TCL.
Abstract: Summary The management goal in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) is to improve symptoms and induce remission. Early-stage disease is generally treated with skin-directed therapies. However, if these do not control the disease, systemic therapy becomes necessary. Bexarotene, a novel rexinoid, is an oral, noncytotoxic drug that has been approved in Europe for the treatment of refractory advanced-stage CTCL and in the U.S.A. for refractory CTCL. We provide guidance on the use of bexarotene in the management of CTCL, based on data from phase II/III clinical trials and the authors’ clinical experience, and suggest how the potential of the drug can be maximized. The clinical trial results with bexarotene are reviewed, especially in comparison with interferon-α, which is the other commonly used noncytotoxic systemic therapy for CTCL. A treatment algorithm for bexarotene in refractory CTCL is suggested. As bexarotene may take time to achieve a maximum response, this algorithm recommends that therapy should be continued for a sufficient period to allow for a delayed onset of action. In addition, possible combination therapies with bexarotene are discussed. We conclude that bexarotene is effective in the management of CTCL, and has the advantage of oral administration. An on-going randomized clinical trial comparing psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) with PUVA plus bexarotene will provide valuable information about this combination regimen in early-stage disease, but further data are needed on the relative efficacies of other combination therapies with bexarotene in CTCL.

126 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This document is designed to outline the current best practice guidelines for the provision of SNB in patients with early-stage OSCC, and to provide a framework for the currently evolving recommendations for its use.
Abstract: Involvement of the cervical lymph nodes is the most important prognostic factor for patients with oral/oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), and the decision of whether to electively treat patients with clinically negative necks remains a controversial topic. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) provides a minimally invasive method for determining the disease status of the cervical node basin, without the need for a formal neck dissection. This technique potentially improves the accuracy of histologic nodal staging and avoids overtreating three-quarters of this patient population, minimizing associated morbidity. The technique has been validated for patients with OSCC, and larger-scale studies are in progress to determine its exact role in the management of this patient population. This document is designed to outline the current best practice guidelines for the provision of SNB in patients with early-stage OSCC, and to provide a framework for the currently evolving recommendations for its use. Preparation of this guideline was carried out by a multidisciplinary surgical/nuclear medicine/pathology expert panel under the joint auspices of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Oncology Committee and the Sentinel European Node Trial (SENT) Committee.

126 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Katherine S. Ruth1, Felix R. Day2, Jazib Hussain3, Ana Martínez-Marchal4  +307 moreInstitutions (91)
04 Aug 2021-Nature
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify 290 genetic determinants of ovarian ageing, assessed using normal variation in age at natural menopause (ANM) in about 200,000 women of European ancestry.
Abstract: Reproductive longevity is essential for fertility and influences healthy ageing in women1,2, but insights into its underlying biological mechanisms and treatments to preserve it are limited. Here we identify 290 genetic determinants of ovarian ageing, assessed using normal variation in age at natural menopause (ANM) in about 200,000 women of European ancestry. These common alleles were associated with clinical extremes of ANM; women in the top 1% of genetic susceptibility have an equivalent risk of premature ovarian insufficiency to those carrying monogenic FMR1 premutations3. The identified loci implicate a broad range of DNA damage response (DDR) processes and include loss-of-function variants in key DDR-associated genes. Integration with experimental models demonstrates that these DDR processes act across the life-course to shape the ovarian reserve and its rate of depletion. Furthermore, we demonstrate that experimental manipulation of DDR pathways highlighted by human genetics increases fertility and extends reproductive life in mice. Causal inference analyses using the identified genetic variants indicate that extending reproductive life in women improves bone health and reduces risk of type 2 diabetes, but increases the risk of hormone-sensitive cancers. These findings provide insight into the mechanisms that govern ovarian ageing, when they act, and how they might be targeted by therapeutic approaches to extend fertility and prevent disease. Hundreds of genetic loci associated with age at menopause, combined with experimental evidence in mice, highlight mechanisms of reproductive ageing across the lifespan.

126 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Routine screening of stroke patients for risk of malnutrition is recommended and research is needed to determine if nutritional support for medium- or high-risk patients results in better outcomes.
Abstract: Background Malnutrition is associated with poor outcomes after stroke. Nutrition screening tools (NSTs) are used to identify patients at risk of malnutrition, but so far no NST has been validated for use with patients who have had a stroke. This study aimed to determine the ability of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) to predict poor outcomes in stroke patients, including mortality, cumulative length of hospital stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs. Methods Patients were recruited from consecutive admissions at 2 hyperacute stroke units in London and were screened for risk of malnutrition (low, medium, and high) according to MUST. Six-month outcomes were obtained for each patient through a national database. Results Of 543 recruited patients, 51% were males, the mean age was 75 years, and 87% had an ischemic stroke. Results showed a highly significant increase in mortality with increasing risk of malnutrition ( P P P P = .049, respectively). This association remained significant in the adjusted model ( P P = .001, respectively). Conclusions Risk of malnutrition is an independent predictor of mortality, LOS, and hospitalization costs at 6 months post stroke. Research is needed to determine if nutritional support for medium- or high-risk patients results in better outcomes. Routine screening of stroke patients for risk of malnutrition is recommended.

125 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Satveer K. Mahil1, Nick Dand2, K.J. Mason3, Zenas Z N Yiu3, Teresa Tsakok1, F. Meynell1, Bola Coker1, H. McAteer4, Lucy Moorhead1, Teena Mackenzie5, Maria Teresa Rossi, Raquel Rivera6, Emmanuel Mahe, Andrea Carugno, Michela Magnano, Giulia Rech, Esther A. Balogh7, Steven R. Feldman7, Claudia de la Cruz, Siew Eng Choon8, Luigi Naldi9, Jo Lambert10, Phyllis I. Spuls11, Denis Jullien, Hervé Bachelez12, Devon E. McMahon13, Esther E. Freeman13, Paolo Gisondi14, Luis Puig15, Richard B. Warren3, Paola Di Meglio2, Sinead Langan16, Sinead Langan1, Francesca Capon2, Christopher E.M. Griffiths3, Jonathan Barker2, Catherine H. Smith1, Aadarsh Shah, Alberto Barea, Alberto Romero-Maté, Alekya Singapore, Alexandra Paolino, Alice Mwale, Ana Maria Morales Callaghan, Ana Martinez, Andrew DeCrescenzo, Andrew Pink, Ann Jones, Ann Sergeant, Annette Essex, Anthony Bewley, Areti Makrygeorgou, Astrid van Huizen, Beatriz Pérez-Suárez, Benhadou Farida, Birgitta Wilson Claréus, Carla Tubau Prims, Carrie Davis, Catherine Quinlan, Catriona Maybury, Gonzalez A. Cesar, Charlotte Barclay, Claudio Greco, Danielle Brassard, Deanna Cummings, Deepti Kolli, Vincent Descamps, Diana Ruiz Genao, Efrossini Carras, Elena B. Hawryluk, Eliseo Martínez-García, Elzbieta Klujszo, Emily Dwyer, Emmanuel Toni, Enikö Sonkoly, Enrique Loayza, Esteban Daudén, Fernando Valenzuela, Georgi Popov, Georgie King, Girard Celine, Gloria Aparicio, Graham A. Johnston, Gustavo Anibal Cardozo, Ian Pearson, Ignacio Yanguas, Jamie Weisman, Jennifer E. Carolan, Jenny Hughes, Jose-Maria Ortiz-Salvador, Jose-Manuel Carrascosa, Joseph J. Schwartz, K. Jackson, Kathryn G. Kerisit, Keith Wu, Leila Asfour, Leontien de Graaf, Cécile Lesort, Lieve Meuleman, Liv Eidsmo, Lone Skov, Lorraine Gribben, Malcolm H.A. Rustin, Manel Velasco, Manisha Panchal, Manpreet Lakhan, Manuel D. Franco, Marie-Louise Svensson, Mark Vandaele, Maruska Marovt, Omid Zargari, Pablo De Caso, Paulo Varela, Peter Jenkin, Céline Phan, P.J. Hampton, Portia Goldsmith, Rachel Bak, Reinhart Speeckaert, Ricardo Romiti, Richard Woolf, Rogelio Mercado-Seda, Rohima Khatun, Romana Ceovic, R. Taberner, Russell W. Cohen, Simina Stefanescu, Sarah Kirk, Saskia Reeken, Shanti Ayob, Silvia Pérez-Barrio, Stefano Piaserico, Susannah Hoey, Tiago Torres, Toomas Talme, Trupti V. Desai, Adrienne J. van Geest, Victoria King, Vito Di Lernia, Zahira Koreja, Vito Zeeshaan Hasab 
TL;DR: In this international moderate-severe psoriasis case series, biologics use was associated with lower risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization than non-biologic systemic therapies, however further investigation is warranted due to potential selection bias and unmeasured confounding.
Abstract: Background The multimorbid burden and use of systemic immunosuppressants in people with psoriasis may confer greater risk of adverse outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the data are limited. Objective Our aim was to characterize the course of COVID-19 in patients with psoriasis and identify factors associated with hospitalization. Methods Clinicians reported patients with psoriasis with confirmed/suspected COVID-19 via an international registry, Psoriasis Patient Registry for Outcomes, Therapy and Epidemiology of COVID-19 Infection. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the association between clinical and/or demographic characteristics and hospitalization. A separate patient-facing registry characterized risk-mitigating behaviors. Results Of 374 clinician-reported patients from 25 countries, 71% were receiving a biologic, 18% were receiving a nonbiologic, and 10% were not receiving any systemic treatment for psoriasis. In all, 348 patients (93%) were fully recovered from COVID-19, 77 (21%) were hospitalized, and 9 (2%) died. Increased hospitalization risk was associated with older age (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.59 per 10 years; 95% CI = 1.19-2.13), male sex (OR = 2.51; 95% CI = 1.23-5.12), nonwhite ethnicity (OR = 3.15; 95% CI = 1.24-8.03), and comorbid chronic lung disease (OR = 3.87; 95% CI = 1.52-9.83). Hospitalization was more frequent in patients using nonbiologic systemic therapy than in those using biologics (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 1.31-6.18). No significant differences were found between classes of biologics. Independent patient-reported data (n = 1626 across 48 countries) suggested lower levels of social isolation in individuals receiving nonbiologic systemic therapy than in those receiving biologics (OR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.50-0.94). Conclusion In this international case series of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, biologic use was associated with lower risk of COVID-19–related hospitalization than with use of nonbiologic systemic therapies; however, further investigation is warranted on account of potential selection bias and unmeasured confounding. Established risk factors (being older, being male, being of nonwhite ethnicity, and having comorbidities) were associated with higher hospitalization rates.

125 citations


Authors

Showing all 7765 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Christopher J L Murray209754310329
Bruce M. Psaty1811205138244
Giuseppe Remuzzi1721226160440
Mika Kivimäki1661515141468
Simon I. Hay165557153307
Theo Vos156502186409
Ali H. Mokdad156634160599
Steven Williams144137586712
Igor Rudan142658103659
Mohsen Naghavi139381169048
Christopher D.M. Fletcher13867482484
Martin McKee1381732125972
David A. Jackson136109568352
Graham G. Giles136124980038
Yang Liu1292506122380
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University Medical Center Groningen
30.3K papers, 967K citations

93% related

Royal Free Hospital
15.7K papers, 651.9K citations

93% related

John Radcliffe Hospital
23.6K papers, 1.4M citations

92% related

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
12.6K papers, 659.2K citations

92% related

Leiden University Medical Center
38K papers, 1.6M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202316
202298
20211,488
20201,123
2019829
2018767