scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

HealthcareLondon, United Kingdom
About: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust is a healthcare organization based out in London, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Randomized controlled trial. The organization has 7686 authors who have published 9631 publications receiving 399353 citations. The organization is also known as: Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust & Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Trust.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This research presents a novel and scalable approach to regenerative medicine called “SmartHR,” which aims to provide real-time information about the immune system’s response to chemotherapy.
Abstract: Mary Frances McMullin, Claire N. Harrison, Sahra Ali, Catherine Cargo, Frederick Chen, Joanne Ewing, Mamta Garg, Anna Godfrey, Steven Knapper S, Donal P. McLornan, Jyoti Nangalia, Mallika Sekhar, Frances Wadelin, Adam J. Mead and on behalf of the BSH Committee Centre for Medical Education, Queen’s University, Belfast, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, The Royal London Hospital, Bart’s Health NHS Trust, London, Birmingham Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, University Hospital of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester (BSH representative), Department of Haematology and Haematopathology and Oncology Diagnostic Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, and MRC Weatherall, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

93 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The present findings, in combination with previously identified modifiers of risk, will ultimately lead to more accurate risk prediction and an improved understanding of the disease etiology in BRCa1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Abstract: Introduction: Several common alleles have been shown to be associated with breast and/or ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Recent genome-wide association studies of breast cancer have identified eight additional breast cancer susceptibility loci: rs1011970 (9p21, CDKN2A/B), rs10995190 (ZNF365), rs704010 (ZMIZ1), rs2380205 (10p15), rs614367 (11q13), rs1292011 (12q24), rs10771399 (12p11 near PTHLH) and rs865686 (9q31.2). Methods: To evaluate whether these single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, we genotyped these SNPs in 12,599 BRCA1 and 7,132 BRCA2 mutation carriers and analysed the associations with breast cancer risk within a retrospective likelihood framework. Results: Only SNP rs10771399 near PTHLH was associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers (per-allele hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.94, P-trend = 3 x 10(-4)). The association was restricted to mutations proven or predicted to lead to absence of protein expression (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.90, P-trend = 3.1 x 10(-5), P-difference = 0.03). Four SNPs were associated with the risk of breast cancer for BRCA2 mutation carriers: rs10995190, P-trend = 0.015; rs1011970, P-trend = 0.048; rs865686, 2df P = 0.007; rs1292011 2df P = 0.03. rs10771399 (PTHLH) was predominantly associated with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer for BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.90, P-trend = 4 x 10(-5)) and there was marginal evidence of association with ER- negative breast cancer for BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.00, P-trend = 0.049). Conclusions: The present findings, in combination with previously identified modifiers of risk, will ultimately lead to more accurate risk prediction and an improved understanding of the disease etiology in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

92 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The recent observation that MRSA strains carrying the antiseptic resistance genes qacA/B can be clinically resistant to chlorhexidine raises a note of caution against its unfettered use.
Abstract: The UK has seen a dramatic reduction in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection and transmission over the past few years in response to the mandatory MRSA bacteraemia surveillance scheme. Healthcare institutions have re-enforced basic infection control practice, such as universal hand hygiene, contact precautions and admission screening; however, the precipitous decline suggests other contributing factors. The intensive care unit (ICU), with its high endemic rates and complex patient population, is an important reservoir for seeding MRSA around the hospital and has understandably been at the forefront of MRSA control programmes. Recent studies from the UK and elsewhere have identified decolonization with agents such as chlorhexidine and mupirocin as having an important and perhaps underappreciated role in reducing ICU MRSA transmission, although evidence is incomplete and no prospective randomized studies have been performed. Chlorhexidine particularly is being recommended in the ICU for an increasing number of indications, including decolonization, universal patient bathing, oropharyngeal antisepsis in ventilated patients and vascular catheter insertion sites. Likewise, although there is little published evidence on decolonization efficacy or practice on UK general wards, it is now recommended for all MRSA-colonized patients and uptake is probably widespread. The recent observation that MRSA strains carrying the antiseptic resistance genes qacA/B can be clinically resistant to chlorhexidine raises a note of caution against its unfettered use. The dissemination of chlorhexidine-resistant MRSA would have implications for the decolonization of individual patients and for preventing transmission.

92 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2013-Stroke
TL;DR: Investigating age and ethnic disparities in stroke incidence over time from an inner-city population–based stroke register found that total stroke incidence decreased during the 16-year time period, however, this was not seen in younger age groups and black groups.
Abstract: Background and Purpose—Data on continuous monitoring of stroke risk among different age and ethnic groups are lacking. We aimed to investigate age and ethnic disparities in stroke incidence over time from an inner-city population–based stroke register. Methods—Trends in stroke incidence and before-stroke risk factors were investigated with the South London Stroke Register, a population-based register covering a multiethnic population of 357 308 inhabitants. Age-, ethnicity-, and sex-specific incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated, assuming a Poisson distribution and their trends over time tested by the Cochran–Armitage test. Results—Four thousand two hundred forty-five patients with first-ever stroke were registered between 1995 and 2010. Total stroke incidence reduced by 39.5% during the 16-year period from 247 to 149.5 per 100 000 population (P 45 years, but not in those aged 1...

92 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Current evidence on GI dysfunction is scarce, partially due to the lack of precise definitions, and the use of core sets of monitoring and outcomes are required to improve the consistency of future studies.
Abstract: Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction is frequent in the critically ill but can be overlooked as a result of the lack of standardization of the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. We aimed to develop a research agenda for GI dysfunction for future research. We systematically reviewed the current knowledge on a broad range of subtopics from a specific viewpoint of GI dysfunction, highlighting the remaining areas of uncertainty and suggesting future studies. This systematic scoping review and research agenda was conducted following successive steps: (1) identify clinically important subtopics within the field of GI function which warrant further research; (2) systematically review the literature for each subtopic using PubMed, CENTRAL and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; (3) summarize evidence for each subtopic; (4) identify areas of uncertainty; (5) formulate and refine study proposals that address these subtopics; and (6) prioritize study proposals via sequential voting rounds. Five major themes were identified: (1) monitoring, (2) associations between GI function and outcome, (3) GI function and nutrition, (4) management of GI dysfunction and (5) pathophysiological mechanisms. Searches on 17 subtopics were performed and evidence summarized. Several areas of uncertainty were identified, six of them needing consensus process. Study proposals ranked among the first ten included: prevention and management of diarrhoea; management of upper and lower feeding intolerance, including indications for post-pyloric feeding and opioid antagonists; acute gastrointestinal injury grading as a bedside tool; the role of intra-abdominal hypertension in the development and monitoring of GI dysfunction and in the development of non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia; and the effect of proton pump inhibitors on the microbiome in critical illness. Current evidence on GI dysfunction is scarce, partially due to the lack of precise definitions. The use of core sets of monitoring and outcomes are required to improve the consistency of future studies. We propose several areas for consensus process and outline future study projects.

92 citations


Authors

Showing all 7765 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Christopher J L Murray209754310329
Bruce M. Psaty1811205138244
Giuseppe Remuzzi1721226160440
Mika Kivimäki1661515141468
Simon I. Hay165557153307
Theo Vos156502186409
Ali H. Mokdad156634160599
Steven Williams144137586712
Igor Rudan142658103659
Mohsen Naghavi139381169048
Christopher D.M. Fletcher13867482484
Martin McKee1381732125972
David A. Jackson136109568352
Graham G. Giles136124980038
Yang Liu1292506122380
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University Medical Center Groningen
30.3K papers, 967K citations

93% related

Royal Free Hospital
15.7K papers, 651.9K citations

93% related

John Radcliffe Hospital
23.6K papers, 1.4M citations

92% related

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
12.6K papers, 659.2K citations

92% related

Leiden University Medical Center
38K papers, 1.6M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202316
202298
20211,488
20201,123
2019829
2018767