Institution
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Healthcare•London, United Kingdom•
About: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust is a healthcare organization based out in London, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Randomized controlled trial. The organization has 7686 authors who have published 9631 publications receiving 399353 citations. The organization is also known as: Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust & Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Trust.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Southern California1, Mayo Clinic2, German Cancer Research Center3, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill4, Roswell Park Cancer Institute5, University of Melbourne6, Westmead Hospital7, Rutgers University8, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg9, National Institutes of Health10, City of Hope National Medical Center11, University of Helsinki12, Vanderbilt University13, University of Tübingen14, Bosch15, Harvard University16, University of Sydney17, University of Sheffield18, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens19, American Cancer Society20, Princess Anne Hospital21, University of California, Los Angeles22, Kaiser Permanente23, University of Hamburg24, Lund University25, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki26, University of Kansas27, Washington University in St. Louis28, University of Miami29, Agency for Science, Technology and Research30, Stanford University31, Cancer Prevention Institute of California32, University of Oulu33, University of Hawaii at Manoa34, University of Eastern Finland35, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology36, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven37, Karolinska Institutet38, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute39, Boston University40, Fox Chase Cancer Center41, University of Pennsylvania42, University of London43, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust44, Heidelberg University45, University of Oxford46, Imperial College London47
TL;DR: The results identify a genetic locus associated with estrogen receptor negative breast cancer subtypes in multiple populations in multiple population of women.
Abstract: Estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer shows a higher incidence in women of African ancestry compared to women of European ancestry. In search of common risk alleles for ER-negative breast cancer, we combined genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from women of African ancestry (1,004 ER-negative cases and 2,745 controls) and European ancestry (1,718 ER-negative cases and 3,670 controls), with replication testing conducted in an additional 2,292 ER-negative cases and 16,901 controls of European ancestry. We identified a common risk variant for ER-negative breast cancer at the TERT-CLPTM1L locus on chromosome 5p15 (rs10069690: per-allele odds ratio (OR) = 1.18 per allele, P = 1.0 × 10(-10)). The variant was also significantly associated with triple-negative (ER-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative and human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2)-negative) breast cancer (OR = 1.25, P = 1.1 × 10(-9)), particularly in younger women (<50 years of age) (OR = 1.48, P = 1.9 × 10(-9)). Our results identify a genetic locus associated with estrogen receptor negative breast cancer subtypes in multiple populations.
291 citations
••
TL;DR: Genomics England’s ambitious plans to embed genomic medicine into routine patient care are well underway and Clare Turnbull and colleagues discuss its progress.
Abstract: In partnership with NHS England, Genomics England’s ambitious plans to embed genomic medicine into routine patient care are well underway. Clare Turnbull and colleagues discuss its progress
289 citations
••
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai1, Radboud University Nijmegen2, Technische Universität München3, Niigata University4, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens5, Université Paris-Saclay6, Medical University of Vienna7, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center8, Charles University in Prague9, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University10, Samsung Medical Center11, Fudan University12, Aarhus University Hospital13, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust14, Rambam Health Care Campus15, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill16, Bristol-Myers Squibb17
TL;DR: In this article, the role of adjuvant treatment in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery was not clear, and a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted.
Abstract: Background The role of adjuvant treatment in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery is not clear. Methods In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery to receive, in a 1:1 ratio, either nivolumab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo every 2 weeks for up to 1 year. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before trial entry was allowed. The primary end points were disease-free survival among all the patients (intention-to-treat population) and among patients with a tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level of 1% or more. Survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract was a secondary end point. Results A total of 353 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab and 356 to receive placebo. The median disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.5 to 27.6) with nivolumab and 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 13.9) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and disease-free at 6 months was 74.9% with nivolumab and 60.3% with placebo (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.70; 98.22% CI, 0.55 to 0.90; P Conclusions In this trial involving patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery, disease-free survival was longer with adjuvant nivolumab than with placebo in the intention-to-treat population and among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 274 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02632409.).
289 citations
••
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust1, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre2, Leiden University3, University of Turin4, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center5, Ohio State University6, University of Wisconsin-Madison7, University of Bordeaux8, Yale University9, University of Paris10, Northwestern University11, University of Barcelona12, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens13, University of Tokyo14, University of Copenhagen15, University of São Paulo16, University of Milan17, Tel Aviv University18, Complutense University of Madrid19, Medical University of Vienna20, University of Florence21, University of Pennsylvania22, University of Bologna23, Autonomous University of Barcelona24, City of Hope National Medical Center25, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust26, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center27, Stanford University28
TL;DR: This study includes the largest cohort of patients with advanced-stage MF/SS and identifies markers with independent prognostic value, which, used together in a prognostic index, may be useful to stratifyadvanced-stage patients.
Abstract: Purpose Advanced-stage mycosis fungoides (MF; stage IIB to IV) and Sezary syndrome (SS) are aggressive lymphomas with a median survival of 1 to 5 years. Clinical management is stage based; however, there is wide range of outcome within stages. Published prognostic studies in MF/SS have been single-center trials. Because of the rarity of MF/SS, only a large collaboration would power a study to identify independent prognostic markers. Patients and Methods Literature review identified the following 10 candidate markers: stage, age, sex, cutaneous histologic features of folliculotropism, CD30 positivity, proliferation index, large-cell transformation, WBC/lymphocyte count, serum lactate dehydrogenase, and identical T-cell clone in blood and skin. Data were collected at specialist centers on patients diagnosed with advanced-stage MF/SS from 2007. Each parameter recorded at diagnosis was tested against overall survival (OS). Results Staging data on 1,275 patients with advanced MF/SS from 29 international sites ...
289 citations
••
TL;DR: This is the first systematic review of the quality and appropriateness of tools designed to monitor progress and outcomes of young children with ASD and it was not possible to recommend fully robust tools at this stage.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The needs of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are complex and this is reflected in the number and diversity of outcomes assessed and measurement tools used to collect evidence about children's progress. Relevant outcomes include improvement in core ASD impairments, such as communication, social awareness, sensory sensitivities and repetitiveness; skills such as social functioning and play; participation outcomes such as social inclusion; and parent and family impact. OBJECTIVES: To examine the measurement properties of tools used to measure progress and outcomes in children with ASD up to the age of 6 years. To identify outcome areas regarded as important by people with ASD and parents. METHODS: The MeASURe (Measurement in Autism Spectrum disorder Under Review) research collaboration included ASD experts and review methodologists. We undertook systematic review of tools used in ASD early intervention and observational studies from 1992 to 2013; systematic review, using the COSMIN checklist (Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) of papers addressing the measurement properties of identified tools in children with ASD; and synthesis of evidence and gaps. The review design and process was informed throughout by consultation with stakeholders including parents, young people with ASD, clinicians and researchers. RESULTS: The conceptual framework developed for the review was drawn from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, including the domains 'Impairments', 'Activity Level Indicators', 'Participation', and 'Family Measures'. In review 1, 10,154 papers were sifted - 3091 by full text - and data extracted from 184; in total, 131 tools were identified, excluding observational coding, study-specific measures and those not in English. In review 2, 2665 papers were sifted and data concerning measurement properties of 57 (43%) tools were extracted from 128 papers. Evidence for the measurement properties of the reviewed tools was combined with information about their accessibility and presentation. Twelve tools were identified as having the strongest supporting evidence, the majority measuring autism characteristics and problem behaviour. The patchy evidence and limited scope of outcomes measured mean these tools do not constitute a 'recommended battery' for use. In particular, there is little evidence that the identified tools would be good at detecting change in intervention studies. The obvious gaps in available outcome measurement include well-being and participation outcomes for children, and family quality-of-life outcomes, domains particularly valued by our informants (young people with ASD and parents). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review of the quality and appropriateness of tools designed to monitor progress and outcomes of young children with ASD. Although it was not possible to recommend fully robust tools at this stage, the review consolidates what is known about the field and will act as a benchmark for future developments. With input from parents and other stakeholders, recommendations are made about priority targets for research. FUTURE WORK: Priorities include development of a tool to measure child quality of life in ASD, and validation of a potential primary outcome tool for trials of early social communication intervention. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42012002223. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
289 citations
Authors
Showing all 7765 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Christopher J L Murray | 209 | 754 | 310329 |
Bruce M. Psaty | 181 | 1205 | 138244 |
Giuseppe Remuzzi | 172 | 1226 | 160440 |
Mika Kivimäki | 166 | 1515 | 141468 |
Simon I. Hay | 165 | 557 | 153307 |
Theo Vos | 156 | 502 | 186409 |
Ali H. Mokdad | 156 | 634 | 160599 |
Steven Williams | 144 | 1375 | 86712 |
Igor Rudan | 142 | 658 | 103659 |
Mohsen Naghavi | 139 | 381 | 169048 |
Christopher D.M. Fletcher | 138 | 674 | 82484 |
Martin McKee | 138 | 1732 | 125972 |
David A. Jackson | 136 | 1095 | 68352 |
Graham G. Giles | 136 | 1249 | 80038 |
Yang Liu | 129 | 2506 | 122380 |