Institution
HEC Paris
Education•Jouy-en-Josas, France•
About: HEC Paris is a education organization based out in Jouy-en-Josas, France. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Investment (macroeconomics) & Market liquidity. The organization has 584 authors who have published 2756 publications receiving 104467 citations. The organization is also known as: Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales & HEC School of Management Paris.
Topics: Investment (macroeconomics), Market liquidity, Corporate governance, Entrepreneurship, Portfolio
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the determinants of value creation and capture in a buyer-supplier relationship were analyzed, in particular, how key contracting parameters, such as production efficiency, transactional integrity, incentive gaming and alignment, affect outcomes when buyer faces competing suppliers.
Abstract: We analyze the determinants of value creation and capture in a buyer-supplier relationship. In particular, we study how key contracting parameters, such as production efficiency, transactional integrity, incentive gaming and alignment affect outcomes when buyer faces competing suppliers. Bringing together the formalism of principal-agent framework with value-based analysis, we seek to understand the contracting micro-foundations behind choice of contracting partners and division of value. We show that transactional integrity and production efficiency are substitutes. We also find that distortion and resulting incentive gaming is unambiguously bad for welfare and hurts the buyer. For some suppliers however, value captured is maximized at intermediate levels of distortion. For alignment, we find that neither of the parties has incentives to sign a contract that maximizes value creation.
27 citations
••
TL;DR: The effect of increased ambiguity in a common pool resource game under environmental uncertainty shows that whereas increased risk may lead to more selfish behavior (i.e., to more consumption), increased ambiguity may have the opposite effect.
27 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors study the second trading line and find that repurchases on the second line have a beneficial impact on the liquidity of repurchasing firms (i.e., higher trading volumes, smaller bid-ask spreads, and thicker total depths).
Abstract: This paper studies a unique buyback method allowing firms to reacquire their own shares on a separate trading line where only the firm is allowed to buy shares. This temporary trading platform is opened concurrently with the original trading line on the stock exchange. This share repurchase method is called the Second Trading Line and has been extensively used by Swiss companies since 1997. This type of repurchase is unique for two reasons. First, unlike open market programs, the repurchasing company does not trade under the cover of anonymity. Second, all transactions made by the repurchasing firm are publicly available in real time to every market participant. This is a case of instantaneous disclosure which contrasts sharply with other markets characterized by delayed or no disclosure. Using actual repurchase data from all buybacks implemented through second trading lines, we find that managers exhibit timing ability for the majority of programs. We also document that the daily repurchase decision is statistically associated with short-term price changes. However, we reject the opportunistic repurchase hypothesis and find no evidence that managers exploit their information advantage when reacquiring shares. We also find that repurchases on the second trading line have a beneficial impact on the liquidity of repurchasing firms (i.e., higher trading volumes, smaller bid-ask spreads, and thicker total depths). Exchanges and regulators may consider the second trading line an attractive share reacquisition mechanism because of its transparency and positive liquidity effects.
27 citations
••
École normale supérieure de Cachan1, HEC Paris2, University of Strasbourg3, Massachusetts Institute of Technology4, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology5, ETH Zurich6, Erasmus University Rotterdam7, University of California, Los Angeles8, Max Planck Society9, University of California, Berkeley10, University of Mannheim11
TL;DR: This paper observes that a robust description–experience gap remains when a source of underweighting of rare events in DFE may be sampling error, and suggests that different assumed error structures in DFD and DFE also contribute to the gap.
Abstract: Uncertainty pervades most aspects of life. From selecting a new technology to choosing a career, decision makers rarely know in advance the exact outcomes of their decisions. Whereas the consequences of decisions in standard decision theory are explicitly described (the decision from description (DFD) paradigm), the consequences of decisions in the recent decision from experience (DFE) paradigm are learned from experience. In DFD, decision makers typically overrespond to rare events. That is, rare events have more impact on decisions than their objective probabilities warrant (overweighting). In DFE, decision makers typically exhibit the opposite pattern, underresponding to rare events. That is, rare events may have less impact on decisions than their objective probabilities warrant (underweighting). In extreme cases, rare events are completely neglected, a pattern known as the “Black Swan effect.” This contrast between DFD and DFE is known as a description–experience gap. In this paper, we discuss several tentative interpretations arising from our interdisciplinary examination of this gap. First, while a source of underweighting of rare events in DFE may be sampling error, we observe that a robust description–experience gap remains when these factors are not at play. Second, the residual description–experience gap is not only about experience per se but also about the way in which information concerning the probability distribution over the outcomes is learned in DFE. Econometric error theories may reveal that different assumed error structures in DFD and DFE also contribute to the gap.
27 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the reactions of the French accounting profession and academia following the collapse of both Enron and Andersen are reviewed, and the value of using corporate scandals in the teaching process and claims that more accounting theory and ethical issues should be introduced in accounting educational programs.
Abstract: This paper reviews the reactions of the French accounting profession and academia following the collapse of both Enron and Andersen. It considers policy statements and declarations on the part of the accounting profession, legislative changes, the general impact on university accounting education programmes and specific developments in accounting teaching at my own institution, HEC. It considers the value of using corporate scandals in the teaching process and claims that more accounting theory and ethical issues should be introduced in accounting educational programmes.
27 citations
Authors
Showing all 605 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Sandor Czellar | 133 | 1263 | 91049 |
Jean-Yves Reginster | 110 | 1195 | 58146 |
Pierre Hansen | 78 | 575 | 32505 |
Gilles Laurent | 77 | 264 | 27052 |
Olivier Bruyère | 72 | 579 | 24788 |
David Dubois | 50 | 169 | 12396 |
Rodolphe Durand | 49 | 173 | 10075 |
Itzhak Gilboa | 49 | 259 | 13352 |
Yves Dallery | 47 | 170 | 6373 |
Duc Khuong Nguyen | 47 | 235 | 8639 |
Eric Jondeau | 45 | 155 | 7088 |
Jean-Noël Kapferer | 45 | 151 | 12264 |
David Thesmar | 41 | 161 | 7242 |
Bruno Biais | 41 | 144 | 8936 |
Barbara B. Stern | 40 | 89 | 6001 |