Institution
HEC Paris
Education•Jouy-en-Josas, France•
About: HEC Paris is a education organization based out in Jouy-en-Josas, France. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Market liquidity & Entrepreneurship. The organization has 584 authors who have published 2756 publications receiving 104467 citations. The organization is also known as: Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales & HEC School of Management Paris.
Topics: Market liquidity, Entrepreneurship, Investment (macroeconomics), Portfolio, Corporate governance
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluate a decade of this regulation and examine how it affected the behavior of shareholders and boards in a sample of FTSE 350 firms during the period 2002-2012.
Abstract: In 2002, the United Kingdom adopted a regulation allowing shareholders to cast non-binding (advisory) votes on their firm's Directors' Remuneration Report during annual general meetings (the 'Say-on-Pay' rule). This study evaluates a decade of this regulation and examines how it affected the behavior of shareholders and boards in a sample of FTSE 350 firms during the period 2002-2012. I find evidence that shareholder dissatisfaction increases with excess CEO compensation. This relationship does not exist for the expected level of compensation, suggesting that shareholders take a sophisticated approach when casting their vote. Boards do not appear to respond to shareholder dissatisfaction systematically, however they do respond selectively by reducing the excessiveness of CEO compensation when performance is poor. Boards also seem to respond swiftly to shareholder dissatisfaction. There is evidence that the probability of CEO turnover increases with shareholder dissatisfaction. Overall, the evidence suggests that 'Say-on-Pay' regulation addressed regulatory concerns about transparency, accountability, and performance linkage.
52 citations
•
TL;DR: In this article, a decision maker is asked to express her beliefs by assigning probabilities to certain possible states, and the relationship between her database and her beliefs is investigated, and it is shown that if beliefs given a union of two databases are a convex combination of beliefs given each of the databases, the belief formation process follows a simple formula.
Abstract: A decision maker is asked to express her beliefs by assigning probabilities to certain possible states. We focus on the relationship between her database and her beliefs. We show that, if beliefs given a union of two databases are a convex combination of beliefs given each of the databases, the belief formation process follows a simple formula: beliefs are a similarity-weighted average of the beliefs induced by each past case.
52 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the merger wave hypothesis for the US and the UK employing a Markov regime switching model and identified the beginning of a merger wave in the mid 1990s but not the much-discussed 1980s merger wave.
Abstract: This paper investigates the merger wave hypothesis for the US and the UK employing a Markov regime switching model. Using quarterly data covering the last thirty years, for the US, we identify the beginning of a merger wave in the mid 1990s but not the much-discussed 1980s merger wave. We argue that the latter finding can be ascribed to the refined methods of inference offered by the Gibbs sampling approach. As opposed to the US, mergers in the UK exhibit multiple waves, with activity surging in the early 1970s and the late 1980s.
52 citations
•
TL;DR: This paper found that middle-status organizations are more aligned and individual leaders make more conventional choices than their low-and high-status peers, and that the extent to which middle status leaders adopt conventional programming is moderated by the status of the organization and by its level of alignment.
Abstract: Beside making organizations look like their peers through the adoption of similar attributes (which we call alignment), this paper highlights the fact that conformity also enables organizations to stand out by exhibiting highly salient attributes key to their field or industry (which we call conventionality). Building on the conformity and status literatures, and using the case of major U.S. symphony orchestras and the changes in their concert programing between 1879 and 1969, we hypothesize and find that middle-status organizations are more aligned, and middle-status individual leaders make more conventional choices than their low- and high-status peers. In addition, the extent to which middle-status leaders adopt conventional programming is moderated by the status of the organization and by its level of alignment. This paper offers a novel theory and operationalization of organizational conformity, and contributes to the literature on status effects, and more broadly to the understanding of the key issues of distinctiveness and conformity.
52 citations
Authors
Showing all 605 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Sandor Czellar | 133 | 1263 | 91049 |
Jean-Yves Reginster | 110 | 1195 | 58146 |
Pierre Hansen | 78 | 575 | 32505 |
Gilles Laurent | 77 | 264 | 27052 |
Olivier Bruyère | 72 | 579 | 24788 |
David Dubois | 50 | 169 | 12396 |
Rodolphe Durand | 49 | 173 | 10075 |
Itzhak Gilboa | 49 | 259 | 13352 |
Yves Dallery | 47 | 170 | 6373 |
Duc Khuong Nguyen | 47 | 235 | 8639 |
Eric Jondeau | 45 | 155 | 7088 |
Jean-Noël Kapferer | 45 | 151 | 12264 |
David Thesmar | 41 | 161 | 7242 |
Bruno Biais | 41 | 144 | 8936 |
Barbara B. Stern | 40 | 89 | 6001 |