Institution
Helsinki Institute for Information Technology
Facility•Espoo, Finland•
About: Helsinki Institute for Information Technology is a facility organization based out in Espoo, Finland. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Bayesian network. The organization has 630 authors who have published 1962 publications receiving 63426 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
16 Jul 2011TL;DR: This work formulate expectation-maximization based optimization into a new form, where complexity can be kept tractable by factored approximations, and gives results for factored infinite-horizon DEC-POMDP problems with up to 10 agents.
Abstract: Decentralized partially observable Markov decision processes (DEC-POMDPs) are used to plan policies for multiple agents that must maximize a joint reward function but do not communicate with each other. The agents act under uncertainty about each other and the environment. This planning task arises in optimization of wireless networks, and other scenarios where communication between agents is restricted by costs or physical limits. DEC-POMDPs are a promising solution, but optimizing policies quickly becomes computationally intractable when problem size grows. Factored DEC-POMDPs allow large problems to be described in compact form, but have the same worst case complexity as non-factored DEC-POMDPs. We propose an efficient optimization algorithm for large factored infinite-horizon DEC-POMDPs. We formulate expectation-maximization based optimization into a new form, where complexity can be kept tractable by factored approximations. Our method performs well, and it can solve problems with more agents and larger state spaces than state of the art DEC-POMDP methods. We give results for factored infinite-horizon DEC-POMDP problems with up to 10 agents.
37 citations
••
TL;DR: The authors proposed a new algorithm for learning causal orders that is robust against one typical violation of the model assumptions, namely latent confounders, by testing independence between estimated external influences and finding subsets (parcels) that include variables unaffected by latent confounding.
Abstract: We consider learning a causal ordering of variables in a linear nongaussian acyclic model called LiNGAM Several methods have been shown to consistently estimate a causal ordering assuming that all the model assumptions are correct But the estimation results could be distorted if some assumptions are violated In this letter, we propose a new algorithm for learning causal orders that is robust against one typical violation of the model assumptions: latent confounders The key idea is to detect latent confounders by testing independence between estimated external influences and find subsets (parcels) that include variables unaffected by latent confounders We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method using artificial data and simulated brain imaging data
37 citations
••
TL;DR: It is shown that a linear acyclic model for latent factors is identifiable when the data are non-Gaussian.
37 citations
•
16 Apr 2019TL;DR: This article proposed two variable selection methods for Gaussian process models that utilize the predictions of a full model in the vicinity of the training points and thereby rank the variables based on their predictive relevance.
Abstract: Variable selection for Gaussian process models is often done using automatic relevance determination, which uses the inverse length-scale parameter of each input variable as a proxy for variable relevance. This implicitly determined relevance has several drawbacks that prevent the selection of optimal input variables in terms of predictive performance. To improve on this, we propose two novel variable selection methods for Gaussian process models that utilize the predictions of a full model in the vicinity of the training points and thereby rank the variables based on their predictive relevance. Our empirical results on synthetic and real world data sets demonstrate improved variable selection compared to automatic relevance determination in terms of variability and predictive performance.
36 citations
••
TL;DR: Two equivalence relations on representations are applied for patterns of occurrence locations, to characterize such patterns by motifs and for both equivalences, quadratic-time algorithms are given for finding a maximal representative of an equivalence class.
36 citations
Authors
Showing all 632 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Dimitri P. Bertsekas | 94 | 332 | 85939 |
Olli Kallioniemi | 90 | 353 | 42021 |
Heikki Mannila | 72 | 295 | 26500 |
Jukka Corander | 66 | 411 | 17220 |
Jaakko Kangasjärvi | 62 | 146 | 17096 |
Aapo Hyvärinen | 61 | 301 | 44146 |
Samuel Kaski | 58 | 522 | 14180 |
Nadarajah Asokan | 58 | 327 | 11947 |
Aristides Gionis | 58 | 292 | 19300 |
Hannu Toivonen | 56 | 192 | 19316 |
Nicola Zamboni | 53 | 128 | 11397 |
Jorma Rissanen | 52 | 151 | 22720 |
Tero Aittokallio | 52 | 271 | 8689 |
Juha Veijola | 52 | 261 | 19588 |
Juho Hamari | 51 | 176 | 16631 |