Institution
Hertie School of Governance
Education•Berlin, Germany•
About: Hertie School of Governance is a education organization based out in Berlin, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Politics & European union. The organization has 213 authors who have published 823 publications receiving 20570 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Aberdeen1, University of California, Irvine2, Technical University of Berlin3, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research4, Hertie School of Governance5, Stanford University6, University of New England (United States)7, Utrecht University8, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency9, ETH Zurich10, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis11, Centre national de la recherche scientifique12, University of Oslo13, Met Office14, University of Exeter15, University of East Anglia16, University of São Paulo17, University of Maryland, College Park18, Carnegie Mellon University19, National Institute for Environmental Studies20, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory21, Korea University22
TL;DR: In this article, the authors quantify potential global impacts of different negative emissions technologies on various factors (such as land, greenhouse gas emissions, water, albedo, nutrients and energy) to determine the biophysical limits to, and economic costs of, their widespread application.
Abstract: To have a >50% chance of limiting warming below 2 °C, most recent scenarios from integrated assessment models (IAMs) require large-scale deployment of negative emissions technologies (NETs). These are technologies that result in the net removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. We quantify potential global impacts of the different NETs on various factors (such as land, greenhouse gas emissions, water, albedo, nutrients and energy) to determine the biophysical limits to, and economic costs of, their widespread application. Resource implications vary between technologies and need to be satisfactorily addressed if NETs are to have a significant role in achieving climate goals.
974 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the challenges of governance facing organizations that pursue a social mission through the use of market mechanisms, and the role of governing boards in prioritizing and aligning potentially conflicting objectives and interests in order to avoid mission drift and maintain organizational hybridity in social enterprises.
746 citations
••
01 Jan 2019TL;DR: The distinction between political and non-political spheres of social life is becoming blurred as mentioned in this paper and the delineation between "political" and "private" concerns and modes of action are becoming blurred.
Abstract: Political sociologists and political scientists who analyze Western European politics have made it a commonplace since the 1970s to emphasize the fusion of political and nonpolitical spheres of social life. They have seriously questioned the usefulness of the conventional dichotomy of “state” and “civil society.” Processes of fusion are evident not only on the level of global sociopolitical arrangements, but also among citizens as elementary political actors. The delineation between “political” and “private” (in other words, moral or economic concerns and modes of action) is becoming blurred.
706 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the rise of Comitology is an institutional response to the deep-seated tensions between the dual supranational and intergovernmentalist structure of the Community on the one hand, and its problem-solving tasks on the other.
Abstract: This article argues that the irresistible rise of Comitology is an institutional response to the deep‐seated tensions between the dual supranational and intergovernmentalist structure of the Community on the one hand, and its problem‐solving tasks on the other. Comitology has accordingly provided a forum in which problems are addressed through evolving and novel processes of interest formation and decision‐making. However, neither legal nor political science have been able properly to evaluate the workings of the committee system, both disciplines remaining trapped within normative structures and traditional methodologies ill‐suited to the analysis of these institutional innovations. As a consequence, this article advocates the trans‐disciplinary study of Comitology, and furthermore argues that the two disciplines might be drawn together by the concept of ‘deliberative supranationalism’: being on the one hand a normative approach which seeks both to preserve the legitimacy of national democracies and to set limits upon the traditional Nation State within a supranational community; and on the other, a theoretical tool which is nonetheless responsive to and accomodating of ‘real‐world’ phenomena.
539 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a new measure System LCOE as the sum of generation and integration costs per unit of variable renewable energy generation (VRE) for evaluating variable renewables like wind and solar power.
Abstract: Levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) are a common metric for comparing power generating technologies. However, there is qualified criticism particularly towards evaluating variable renewables like wind and solar power based on LCOE because it ignores integration costs that occur at the system level. In this paper we propose a new measure System LCOE as the sum of generation and integration costs per unit of VRE. For this purpose we develop a conclusive definition of integration costs. Furthermore we decompose integration costs into different cost components and draw conclusions for integration options like transmission grids and energy storage. System LCOE are quantified from a power system model and a literature review. We find that at moderate wind shares (~20%) integration costs can be in the same range as generation costs of wind power and conventional plants. Integration costs further increase with growing wind shares. We conclude that integration costs can become an economic barrier to deploying VRE at high shares. This implies that an economic evaluation of VRE must not neglect integration costs. A pure LCOE comparison would significantly underestimate the costs of VRE at high shares. System LCOE give a framework of how to consistently account for integration costs and thus guide policy makers and system planers in designing a cost-efficient power system.
450 citations
Authors
Showing all 244 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Helmut K. Anheier | 50 | 247 | 10985 |
Jan C. Minx | 44 | 118 | 12845 |
Claus Offe | 39 | 182 | 7661 |
Johanna Mair | 39 | 127 | 13130 |
Michael Zürn | 38 | 137 | 6006 |
Klaus Hurrelmann | 38 | 258 | 5585 |
Michaela Kreyenfeld | 34 | 169 | 4624 |
Christoph Trebesch | 34 | 107 | 3949 |
Martin Lodge | 34 | 140 | 4364 |
Christian Joerges | 32 | 189 | 3854 |
Joanna J. Bryson | 31 | 175 | 4654 |
Malte Spielmann | 30 | 73 | 5450 |
Lion Hirth | 29 | 76 | 4941 |
Björn Niehaves | 29 | 180 | 3871 |
Gideon D. Markman | 28 | 60 | 6742 |